01-12-2022 · 市場觀點

Factors are an all-season phenomenon

Multi-factor strategies currently present an appealing opportunity for equity investors, even against a challenging macroeconomic backdrop. In summarizing key insights from the last two years, we outline how the value, momentum, quality and low-risk factors have historically delivered robust long-term returns, and how they are currently cheaply valued relative to their historical levels. Moreover, we highlight how equity factor premiums typically display resilience when inflation is elevated or interest rates are rising.


  • Daniël Haesen - Portfolio Manager

    Daniël Haesen

    Portfolio Manager

  • Bart van Vliet - Investment Specialist

    Bart van Vliet

    Investment Specialist

The ‘quant equity winter’ chill of 2018-2020 has made way for a sunnier outcome in the past two years as equity factors have strongly rebounded. While this has been welcomed by many asset owners, some are perhaps questioning whether the outlook will remain constructive.

There are several reasons why we are confident that factor investing will continue to reward long-term investors as it has in the past. As Mark Twain is reputed to have said: “History doesn’t repeat itself but if often rhymes.” To this end, Figure 1 illustrates how equity factors have endured in both developed and emerging market over multiple decades.

Figure 1 | Factors have generated healthy long-term premiums

Figure 1 | Factors have generated healthy long-term premiums

Source: Robeco. CAPM alpha of individual factor premiums and multi-factor combination of factors relative to the MSCI World Index (DM) and MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EM). The sample period is January 1986 or 1996 to December 2021.

But even beyond recent history, factors have been proven to be persistent phenomena, as shown in a groundbreaking research paper by Guido Baltussen and colleagues that used an out-of-sample dataset.1 In this study, the researchers constructed a novel US stock database for the period 1866 to 1926 (pre-CSRP) and uncovered economically substantial and statistically significant premiums as well as CAPM alphas for the value, momentum and low-risk factors.

Also, the 1927-2019 period represents the common sample used by hundreds of ‘Fama-French-style’ academic studies that have also found statistically significant premiums for the same set of factors. This underlines that factor premiums are an ‘eternal’ feature of financial markets and makes a compelling case for long-term allocations to equity factors.

Strong hands unlock long-term benefits of factor investing

But like any investment style, factor investing is not without risks. While factors offer investors a premium in the long run, they do go through bull and bear phases in the short run as outlined in the Robeco quant cycle research.2 These downturns are typically associated with value crashes or growth rallies and can result in multi-factor strategies suffering drawdowns potentially lasting several years, as depicted in Figure 2.

Figure 2 | Multi-factor strategies can encounter short-term risks

Figure 2 | Multi-factor strategies can encounter short-term risks

Source: Robeco. Shown are market-relative drawdowns for multi-factor strategies in developed markets (DM) and emerging markets (EM). The sample period is January 1986 or 1996 to December 2021.

The quant equity winter of 2018-20203 is an example that highlights this risk and is still fresh in our memories. When we reflect back on this tough period, we can recall how poor sentiment was towards equity factors, especially low risk and value. But such challenging episodes emphasize how ‘strong hands’ are required to endure periods of underperformance in order to reap the long-term benefits of factor investing.

As the saying goes, hindsight is 20/20 and equity factors have embarked on a recovery in the last two years, consigning the quant equity malaise to the past. That is why we often say quant investing is more a test of character than a test of intelligence. And based on our quant cycle research, it appears as if we are now back in the ‘normal’ stage in which equity factors tend to do well.

Factors are cheap based on historical levels

From a fundamental perspective, attractive equity factor valuations further underpin our sanguine outlook. Based on our experience, the various behavioral pitfalls that cause investors to be at times overly optimistic or pessimistic – sometimes called ‘animal spirits’ – can result in equity factor valuations either being expensive or cheap relative to long-term averages. That said, these valuations tend to mean-revert in the long run, and changes in them are drivers of short-term factor returns.

Against this backdrop, the value, momentum, quality and low-risk factors as well as a multi-factor combination all currently trade at attractive levels, as illustrated in Table 1. Consequently, we believe the medium- to long-term outlook is favorable for equity factors as low valuations have historically been associated with higher future returns.

Table 1 | Factors are attractively priced relative to historical valuations

Table 1 | Factors are attractively priced relative to historical valuations

Source: Robeco, Refinitiv, Bloomberg. The table shows the current spread and percentiles of the current versus historical composite valuation spreads for the Value, Momentum, Quality, and Low-Risk factors. The investment universe consists of constituents of the MSCI Developed and Emerging Markets indices12. The sample period is January 1986 to June 2022.

However, a challenging macroeconomic picture characterized by declining growth, rising inflation and interest rates does complicate the picture.

Factor premiums are robust in various inflation regimes

So, given the backdrop of uncharacteristically high inflation (at least compared to what we have seen in the past 30 years), we investigated the historical efficacy of proven equity factors in different inflation regimes in a recent paper.4 As periods of high inflation and deflation are relatively uncommon in recent history, we used a deep sample extending from 1875 to 2021.

Interestingly, we observed that equity factor premiums were generally consistent across varying inflation regimes, in contrast to the equity asset class premium. For example, Figure 3 shows that the long-short multi-factor equity portfolio produces fairly stable performance across all scenarios. At the individual long-short factor level, the variation in returns across inflation buckets was somewhat higher, but never strayed too far from long-term averages.

Figure 3 | Equity factor premiums are resilient across different inflation regimes

Figure 3 | Equity factor premiums are resilient across different inflation regimes

Source: Robeco. Shown are market-relative drawdowns for multi-factor strategies in developed markets (DM) and emerging markets (EM). The sample period is January 1986 or 1996 to December 2021.

While we acknowledge that long-only factors are not immune to high inflation, our findings imply that they should, on average, be less affected compared to the traditional equity asset class.

Factors are not overly sensitive to interest rate changes

Furthermore, we also examined the relationship between factor returns and interest rate movements in two Robeco studies in 2021 and 2022. We observed that the value factor tended to perform better in the months in which yields rose over the last 10 years. However, this relationship is highly dynamic as the value factor was not significantly related to changes in bond yields before 2015, and only became considerably linked in the last few years.

Low-risk had a somewhat negative link, albeit limited. However, this was not uniform over the sample period as the connection was largely absent around the 2000s. Momentum was negatively related to yield changes over the full sample period. But similar to value, this effect seemed to be mostly concentrated in the last years of the sample. Finally, quality returns were generally unrelated to yield changes over the entire interval.

Consequently, we believe having exposure to multiple factors in a portfolio not only diversifies individual factor and stock risks but also factor sensitivities to yield movements, as these vary widely across factors and time.


All in all, we believe multi-factor strategies present an appealing opportunity for equity investors. From a fundamental perspective, equity factors are attractively priced and portend high expected long-term returns. Moreover, factor premiums have historically held their own in times of high inflation and rising interest rates. Therefore, we believe that together these elements make a strong case for exposure to multiple factors.


本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。