市場觀點

Quant Chart: Who's afraid of the Tariff Man?

Speculation, announcements, reversals, and legal battles over tariffs have so far dominated market headlines in 2025. As a result, companies are once again discussing the potential impact of tariffs on their business models. But are they mostly worried, broadly neutral, or are some even seeing opportunities?

作者

    Researcher
    Portfolio Manager and Technology Analyst
    Researcher

Tariffs returned to the spotlight in financial markets once it became clear that self-proclaimed ‘Tariff Man’ Donald Trump was set to return to the White House. Attention increased further following ‘Liberation Day’ on 2 April, when Trump announced a new round of ‘reciprocal’ tariffs.1

Tariff talk

Since then, tariffs have been a recurring topic in both markets and boardrooms. Figure 1 below illustrates this trend. Each bar represents the number of MSCI World Index constituents that mentioned tariffs in their earnings calls, quarter by quarter. 2 While the topic was prominent during Trump's first term, the number of companies referencing tariffs has since doubled from the Q3 2018 peak, with 600 out of 862 companies mentioning tariffs in the current (and still-ongoing) quarter.

Figure 1 | Tariffs in company communication

Source: Robeco, MSCI, FactSet.
The figure shows the number of firms mentioning “tariffs” in earnings call conferences. The bars break down the sentiment around tariffs into “worried”, “neutral”, and “opportunistic”, and the purple line indicates the share of “worried” firms among those discussing tariffs. The analysis includes all MSCI World Index constituents and covers the period from January 2016 through 29 May 2025, by which time earnings call data was available for 64% of the constituents.

Beyond the sheer number of companies mentioning tariffs, investors are also interested in the tone of those discussions. Are companies mainly worried, broadly neutral, or might some even be perceiving opportunities?

Reading between the words

To extract such insights, we apply modern natural language processing (NLP) techniques to analyze earnings calls.3 In the chart above, the different bar segments indicate the sentiment classification according to our proprietary NLP sentiment pipeline. Notably, most companies spoke neutrally (orange) about tariffs. However, in periods when tariffs are high on the agenda, such as in 2018/2019 or now (April/May 2025), the share of companies expressing concerns increases, as illustrated by the purple line. At the same time, a small group of companies continues to see tariffs as opportunities.4

The tariff case shows how NLP can help investors extract sentiment from unstructured data – such as corporate filings, news articles, earnings calls, management interviews, and social media – and spot shifts in market narratives, even when the topic itself ebbs and flows over time. As these tools become more sophisticated, their role in identifying broader themes, tracking their evolution, and measuring associated sentiment continues to grow.

The real value of NLP

These advances mean the questions investors ask themselves are also evolving: from our tongue-in-cheek, ‘Who’s afraid of the Tariff Man?’ to the more serious, ‘What else can AI tools like NLP help us understand?’ Such next-gen quant capabilities – as well as knowing how to use them – are increasingly relevant, both for quantitative but also for thematic investors aiming to capture both emerging and established trends.

Footnotes

1 For more details on how the reciprocal tariffs were computed, see Nangle T., April 2025, “The stupidest chart you’ll see today”, Financial Times.
2 Earnings call coverage typically ranges from 60% to 85% of MSCI World Index constituents, depending on the quarter.
3 Unlike structured financial or market data, text data from sources such as earnings calls, news articles, or management interviews is unstructured and context-dependent. Early methods like ‘Bag of Words’ have long been used to quantify sentiment, but they lack the ability to capture relationships between words. More advanced NLP techniques can address this by using contextual embeddings – such as FinBERT – or transformer-based models like GPT, which better interpret meaning in context.
4 Analyzing sentiment at the sector level highlights the effectiveness of our NLP pipeline. On average, companies in Utilities, Communication Services, and Financials express less concern about tariffs, while those in Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples tend to be more worried.

Quant Charts

重要資料

本網站僅供《證券及期貨條例》(香港法例第571章)及其附屬法例所界定之專業投資者瀏覽及使用。 投資涉及風險。過往表現並不代表未來表現。本網站所載資料僅供參考之用,並不構成任何投資建議,亦非作出買賣任何證券或採納任何投資策略之要約或招攬。投資者不應僅憑本網站提供之資料作出投資決定,在作出任何投資決定前,應徵詢獨立意見(包括有關稅務影響之意見)。投資者應確保完全理解投資產品的相關風險,亦應考量自身投資目標及風險承受水平。投資乃閣下之個人決定。除非銷售投資產品的中介人已向閣下告知該投資產品適合閣下,並已解釋其符合閣下投資目標之原因,否則閣下不應投資。請參閱相關發售文件或其他法律文件,以獲取包括風險因素在內的進一步詳情。 本網站由荷寶投資管理香港有限公司發布,該公司受香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(「證監會」)規管(中央編號:APU851)。本網站未經證監會審閱。 無法保證任何投資產品可實現其投資目標。概不就任何投資產品之表現或投資回報作任何聲明或承諾。投資的價值或會波動。本網站所載過往表現、推算或預測,均不應視作未來表現之保證或指標,且概不提供任何明示或暗示之保證。本網站內容建基於相信為可靠之來源,惟因應資料傳遞技術特性及須採用多項數據來源(包括第三方內容),故概不保證其準確性。所述觀點僅乃截至上述日期,或會隨市況變化而改變,可予更改而毋須另行通知。該等意見可能有別於其他荷寶投資專業人士之意見。因使用本材料或當中所載任何評論、意見或估算而引致之直接、間接或相應損失,荷寶概不承擔法律責任。荷寶並無責任更新本網站或任何網站內容。未經荷寶事先書面許可,不得複製、分發或刊發本網站任何材料。 除非另有說明,資料來源:荷寶。

警告 — 有不法分子在網站及社交媒體上冒用荷寳 了解更多