We will set five-year carbon footprint reduction goals

We will set five-year carbon footprint reduction goals

22-02-2021 | インタビュー
Decarbonization in the making. Robeco recently announced its ambition to achieve net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 across all its assets under management. Decarbonization targets will be set for all our strategies, in line with our commitment to the Paris Climate Accord. But what does that change in practice for investors? We discussed the consequences with Guido Moret, head of sustainability integration in credits, and Arnoud Klep, portfolio manager from our quant equity team.
  • Arnoud Klep
    Portfolio Manager
  • Guido Moret
    Head of Sustainability Integration Fixed Income

Speed read

  • New climate fixed income strategies, a yardstick for other portfolios
  • Several sustainable quant equity strategies to become Paris-aligned
  • If firms fail to reduce emissions, investors will face additional constraints

Could you explain the idea behind this pledge?

Guido Moret: “This announcement was made as Robeco helped launch the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, which fostered the commitment of 30 asset managers representing USD 9 trillion in assets to help achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050 or sooner. With this, we want to give more substance to our support to global efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C, as agreed in the Paris Climate Accord.” < p class="quote">The Paris Agreement was signed in 2015. So, it was time to take bolder steps

The Paris Agreement was signed in 2015. So, it was time to take bolder steps

“The Paris Agreement was signed in 2015. So, it was time to take bolder steps. From now on, we will set five-year goals in terms of carbon footprint reduction across all our portfolios. This is no small feat. To give you an idea of the disruption needed, the pandemic only cut CO2 emissions by a mere 12% to 15% at best in 2020. That’s the reduction we’ll need to achieve every two years to get near to zero by 2050.”

So, where do you start, then?

G.M.: “This will be a learning process. In December 2020, we launched two new climate fixed income strategies. These are the first global fixed income strategies to be fully compliant with the EU benchmark regulation for Paris-aligned investments. They will represent a yardstick for other fixed income portfolios, including quantitative strategies.

“The two strategies will aim to reduce their weighted carbon intensity by 7% year on year, while outperforming their Paris-aligned benchmarks. This will be done taking into account scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions. In other words, we will be taking into account all emissions, direct and indirect ones, including those of each company’s value chain.”

Arnoud Klep: “On the quant equity side, we plan to bring several of our sustainable strategies in line with the Paris Climate Accord in the coming months. The first will be one of our Global Sustainable Conservative Equity strategies, for which we have already completed the client consultation process and received the greenlight from existing clients.”

“This strategy will become ‘Paris-aligned’ as early as March 2021. The most important change will obviously be a much stricter carbon footprint reduction objective. Currently, our entire sustainable quant equity range has a reduction objective of 20% relative to its reference index. We would implement a 50% reduction as a starting point. In addition, we would target a 7% footprint reduction every year thereafter.”

OK. But how do you concretely manage to reduce your carbon footprint?

G.M.: “There are several ways to do this. The first one is to stop investing in certain businesses that are incompatible with net zero emissions. This means, for instance, excluding all production of fossil fuels. Meanwhile, you would still be able to invest in other sectors, but their emissions would need decrease by 7% every year, on average, to remain investable.”

While our sustainable quant equity portfolios have already reduced exposure to the energy sector, restrictions will become even stricter once they are Paris-aligned

A.K.: “So, to give you an example, while our sustainable quant equity portfolios have already reduced exposure to the energy sector, restrictions will become even stricter once they are Paris-aligned. Companies involved with thermal coal will be excluded, and so will most oil & gas companies, especially the oil majors. Restrictions on electric utilities will also be much tighter.”

OK. But would these kind of restrictions be realistic for all our portfolios?

G.M.: “In the short term, divesting from fossil fuel producers overnight across all portfolios would be next to impossible. In the longer term, achieving the 7% annual decrease target will largely depend on the path we take collectively towards net zero emissions. If companies fail to reduce their emissions to the extent needed, we will face additional constraints.”

A.K.: “Indeed, if we, as a global community, do manage to decrease our GHG emissions over time, then the 7% decrease target may never become a significantly restrictive constraint for stock or bond selection. But if companies do not succeed, then asset managers will have to compensate, and the 7% reduction target may become more difficult to achieve.”

One way we can support the transition towards net zero emissions is through engagement with companies

G.M.: “One way we can support the transition towards net zero emissions is through engagement with companies. Another way would be to compensate GHG emissions, for example through carbon capture and storage, reforestation, or simply more sustainable agricultural practices. But all these options come with challenges and limitations, and there is no silver bullet.”

Decarbonizing portfolios will necessarily have an impact on their profile. What consequences should investors expect?

G.M.: “In fixed income, our tests suggest the risk-return profile of portfolios should remain practically unchanged, or even improve. Decarbonizing would lead to lower returns but also even lower risk, and therefore improved Sharpe ratios. One reason for this is that the energy sector was among the most volatile recently, due to its relatively high correlation with oil prices. So, by excluding fossil fuel-related businesses you mechanically lower volatility in the prevailing conditions.”

A.K.: “For quant equities, our simulations show that we can build Paris-aligned portfolios that still enable strong factor exposures. In theory, limiting the opportunity set should bear some cost in terms of performance. And this is what we actually find, although in a global investment universe with ample investment opportunities the impact is limited: Paris-aligned quant equity strategies would be able to capture about 90% to 95% of the risk-return potential compared to the standard quant equity strategies.”

“But these simulations are based on past prices and therefore assume that there is no alpha potential from getting a strategy Paris-aligned. If climate change-related risks, like stranded assets or transition risks, rise and materialize, then we will not be discussing the negative impact of getting Paris-aligned but rather its positive effect. So, it is also a matter of perspective.”


当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。




商号等: ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社  金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長(金商)第2780号

加入協会: 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会