

谁还需要科技“七巨头”:长尾机遇正当时
过去五年,全球股市集中度持续攀升,整体回报愈发依赖于少数超大型股票。截止2025年10月30日,美股科技“七巨头”已占据MSCI全球指数总市值逾四分之一。尽管投资者难以回避它们对市场整体表现(Beta)的主导作用,却可以选择不让这种集中度绑架自己的超额收益(Alpha)。
Our new article explains how Robeco’s benchmark-aware Active Equities approach is designed to keep alpha generation broad, ensuring performance is not overly influenced by just a handful of names.
As of 30 October 2025, the so-called Magnificent Seven stocks have ballooned to more than a quarter of the entire MSCI World index.1 The rise in concentration has been steady, but the narrative surrounding it has not, starting with the name.
Over the past decade, this small, evolving cohort of dominant companies has been rebranded repeatedly – from FANG, to FAANG, FAANG+, MAMAA, Magnificent Seven, and even BATMMAAN – each acronym attempting to capture the prevailing market story of the moment.2 And those stories have shifted just as often, from the platform-economy boom to the impact of quantitative easing, and from the Covid-driven digital acceleration to most recently the surge in AI enthusiasm. Yet despite the changing names and narratives, one constant has remained: the sheer scale of these firms and the outsized influence they continue to exert on global equity markets.
Such an acceleration is rarely seen outside of periods of high euphoria. In practical terms, fewer stocks now drive a greater share of total market absolute performance, with the effective N 3 decreasing from more than 300 in 2005 to just 84 in October 2025. Expressed differently: the market may contain thousands of listed companies, but the experience of owning the index has increasingly resembled owning just a few. The composition of major developed market indices, such as the MSCI World Index, is a stark reflection of the prevailing narrative, as depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1 – Weight of Magnificent Seven stocks in the MSCI World Index

Source: Robeco, LSEG. The figure shows the cumulative weight of the Magnificent Seven stocks in global developed markets. The Magnificent Seven comprise Alphabet (A & C shares), Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. Global developed markets are represented by the MSCI World Index. The sample period covers October 2005 to October 2025. For illustrative purposes only.
The challenge
It cannot be denied that these companies have reached a size where they are key drivers of market beta and will remain so, at least for the foreseeable future. The real question is whether your alpha must also be dictated by this same small group. When such a small group of stocks contributes so meaningfully to index returns, large relative positions in aggregate – either overweight or underweight – can become the primary drivers of whether a strategy outperforms or underperforms. For many active strategies it has concentrated both opportunity and risk in a way that challenges the foundations of diversification, with significant implications.
For investors positioning against current leaders in anticipation of mean reversion, the risk is that the momentum extends and persists longer than valuation models might suggest, leading to a persistent relative performance drag. Yet leaning heavily into the winners is equally problematic. Concentrated overweight positions can amplify portfolio risk and create uncomfortable exposure to a narrative that could shift quickly, especially if earnings momentum slows, policy environments change, or business models are disrupted. History shows that reversals often occur not gradually, but abruptly – and after prolonged periods where it was claimed, “This time is different”.
关注官方微信

A benchmark-aware quant solution
Robeco offers a third path: a systematic, benchmark-aware approach that spreads risk across the full equity universe. Rather than making big calls on the Magnificent Seven – or missing out on them entirely – the strategy takes many small under- and overweight positions, guided by diversified return signals and disciplined risk controls at the stock, sector, and country levels. This keeps any single exposure from overpowering the portfolio.
The result is a portfolio of hundreds of positions, each contributing modestly to active risk and return. Alpha is built through breadth, not concentrated bets; aiming to capture opportunities across the entire market rather than relying on the dominant index constituents of the moment.
Footnotes
1The Magnificent Seven refers to Alphabet (A and C shares), Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla.
2FANG initially comprised Facebook (now Meta), Amazon, Netflix, and Google (A and C shares, now Alphabet). FAANG added Apple, while FAANG+ referred to FAANG plus additional large-cap technology stocks such as Microsoft or Tesla (with definitions varying across sources). MAMAA consists of Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. BATMMAAN extends the Magnificent Seven by adding Broadcom to this cohort.
3Effective N is calculated as the inverse of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for portfolio weights, where HHI is the sum of the squared stock weights. For instance, in a portfolio of 100 stocks with equal weights, the effective N would be 100. In contrast, if a single stock dominated 99.9% of a 100-stock portfolio, the effective N would be closer to 1.
免责声明:
本文由荷宝私募基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况, 荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。






























