This CIO's summer reading list on sustainability – and why you should read it too

This CIO's summer reading list on sustainability – and why you should read it too

09-09-2022 | 訪問

Climate change is urgent, and a more comprehensive approach is needed to tackle it effectively. Biodiversity ought to be our starting point, and more equal distribution of wealth is also required, says Victor Verberk, Robeco’s CIO Fixed Income and Sustainability, as he reflects on the reading he did on sustainability over the holidays.

  • Victor  Verberk
    CIO Fixed Income and Sustainability

Speed read

  • Sustainability is becoming a recognized risk factor for investors
  • The wave of policy and regulation in this field will gain even more momentum
  • Developing IP on biodiversity alongside climate is key to Robeco’s strategy

This is the second year that you’ve shared your summer reading list on sustainable investing with Robeco employees. With so much happening geopolitically and in markets, where does sustainability fit into your thinking about the future of economies and investing?

“A secular change is taking place in sustainability. At the same time, we’re also experiencing what seems to be a secular change in the rates cycle. It is an exciting combination that’s resulting in new large-scale investment plans and policy changes. I expect there to be plenty of discussion about the business cycle and what the relevant sustainable investing (SI) premium needs to be, in addition to the more traditional factor premiums.”

“It is clear that society is driving the proliferation of sustainability as a risk factor. A wall of scientific evidence on sustainability challenges is being generated, which must be taken seriously by policymakers. As an example, the EU is taking the lead in bringing down spillover effects by designing new legislation. It means the EU will soon no longer accept the sale of ‘dirty’ products in the region. Companies unable to prove that child labor was not involved in the manufacturing process, among other criteria, can expect their revenues to drop.”


Your reading list covers a lot of ground. What are your overall observations?

“I have three observations. One is that, while we have seen a fair amount of new policy and regulatory reaction in the field of sustainability, much more will follow. Second, I believe that the SDGs are proving to be the common global language around nature and sustainable economics. Thirdly, there is the realization that we need to look more broadly at climate, and that biodiversity ought to be our starting point.”

Starting with your remark on regulation, what can we expect?

“Over recent years, policymakers have made pledges on key topics such as the SDGs, sustainability reporting, climate and biodiversity. We are now entering the phase in which science will ensure accountability for these commitments.”

“Have a look, for example, at the ‘Sustainable Development Report 2022’, which assesses our progress on the SDGs at the halfway point. Reports such as these most likely will lead to more regulation. Other economic regions will have to follow the EU’s leading example on reducing externalities. This means that transition risk – think of carbon taxes, import tariffs and mandatory reporting – will increase. The train has left the station with respect to policy reactions: expect more regulation to follow.”

“The SDGs will play a key role in this, as a standard or a measurement framework. The One Earth paper, entitled ‘Defining a sustainable development target space for 2030 and 2050’, proposes a quantifiable framework with which to do this.”

You emphasize the role of nature. Why is this so important?

“The regenerating capacity of nature is the crux. Nature delivers vital assets and services – like pollination or providing clean drinking water – but needs time to regenerate after being depleted by our actions. We are far from being on the right track in this. The paper ‘The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations’ clarifies and confirms this. Humans are living beyond planetary limitations, and climate change is just one outcome of this. We need to look more broadly at the problem in order to craft the best solution. In particular, our focus has to be on the complex subject of biodiversity. It is crucial to understand the profound consequences for wealth and health of the loss of genetic pools, clean water or pollination.”

“As an example, the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures earlier this year published its proposed framework for nature-related risk management. This is an important read as it is likely to become the global standard for integrating nature risks in business planning.”

“As part of this, we have to be clear that, for a just transition, we need objectives for indigenous populations that are defined by local natural conditions. A much fairer distribution of wealth is a critical topic that forms part of the considerations around biodiversity.”

How does this shape the way that you approach Robeco’s longer-term strategy and investment processes?

“Our objective is to keep the balance between (shorter-term) performance and (longer-term) SI factors. In the long run, the members of our SI Center of Expertise such as the thought leaders, the SI analysts, active ownership specialists and the SI client portfolio managers will guide us on SI, while we keep deepening our skills on financial markets.”

“I refer to this as our ‘SI strategy 3.0’. Developing intellectual property on biodiversity alongside climate is key to this strategy. In short, climate, biodiversity and human rights are the three sustainability topics we should focus on. And as investment professionals we need to transform into so-called ‘Portfolio Managers 2.0’. SI has become a risk premium and we all need to be able to have a basic conversation on these three subjects. This is founded on our firm belief that sustainability is not only about exclusions and lost opportunities, but rather a risk factor that might pay off.”

“We also feel strongly about the importance of working collectively to find solutions. Related to this, we first mentioned open-source thinking in last year’s summer holiday reading. Since then, more open-source platforms have emerged, primarily in the academic world and at intergovernmental think tanks. We believe this is the right approach, and one that motivated our decision to open up Robeco’s SI intellectual property. As a first step in this open-access initiative, our clients and a group of academics will gain free access to the SDG scores that we generate using our proprietary SDG framework for companies.”

“Traditionally, asset managers have tended to protect their intellectual property and use it to add value to their proprietary investment processes. Yet the massive challenges our planet is facing require a different approach. We need to join forces to address these challenges appropriately. By opening up our SDG data to a broader audience, we aim to help improve quality and the setting of standards across the industry.”

What is your personal viewpoint on our future?

“For me, there is one overarching theme in all of this, which is the need to think about the global population. Earth can handle the consumption ambitions of a country such as Bangladesh, even if global population densities were to rise from current levels. However, if we all aspire to having living standards equivalent to those in Germany, the world would be too small.”

“Population growth combined with increasing consumption will lead to a breaching of planetary boundaries. We need to consider the regenerative power of nature and the extent to which it implies a limit to the global population. If not, we are doomed and will be unable to make serious progress. Nevertheless, as I am an optimist, I believe that innovation and the technological revolution will have an important role in generating solutions for a sustainable future.”

List of papers:

Fanning, A.L., O’Neill, D.W., Hickel, J. et al., 2022, “The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations”, Nature Sustainability, 5 (1), pp. 26-36.
IPCC, 2021, “Climate change 2021, The physical science basis: summary for policy makers”, August.
IPBES, 2019, “The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Summary for policy makers.
Ridley, M., 2020, “How Innovation Works: And Why It Flourishes in Freedom”, Harper Perennial.
Smil, V., 2022, “How the world really works: A Scientist's Guide to Our Past, Present and Future”, Penguin.
TNFD, 2022, “The TNFD Nature-related risk & opportunity management and disclosure framework”, beta v0.2 release, June.
United Nations, 2022, “Sustainable Development Report 2022: From crisis to Sustainable Development; the SDG as roadmap to 2030 and beyond”. Cambridge.
Van Vuuren, D.P., Zimm, C., Busch, S. et al., 2022, “Defining a sustainable development target space for 2030 and 2050”, One Earth, Elsevier Inc., February.

Important information

The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice. This document has been distributed by Robeco Hong Kong Limited (‘Robeco’). Robeco is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.
This document has been prepared on a confidential basis solely for the recipient and is for information purposes only. Any reproduction or distribution of this documentation, in whole or in part, or the disclosure of its contents, without the prior written consent of Robeco, is prohibited. By accepting this documentation, the recipient agrees to the foregoing
This document is intended to provide the reader with information on Robeco’s specific capabilities, but does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell certain securities or investment products. Investment decisions should only be based on the relevant prospectus and on thorough financial, fiscal and legal advice.
The contents of this document are based upon sources of information believed to be reliable. This document is not intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Investment Involves risks. Historical returns are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect Robeco’s expectations for the future. The value of your investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no indication of current or future performance.



1. 一般事項


此網站由Robeco Hong Kong Limited(「荷寶」)擬備及刊發,荷寶是獲香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會發牌從事第1類(證券交易)、第4類(就證券提供意見)及第9類(資產管理)受規管活動的企業。荷寶不持有客戶資產,並受到發牌條件所規限。荷寶在擴展至零售業務之前,必須先得到證監會的批准。本網頁未經證券及期貨事務監察委員會或香港的任何監管當局審閱。

2. 風險披露聲明

Robeco Capital Growth Funds以其特定的投資政策或其他特徵作識別,請小心閱讀有關Robeco Capital Growth Funds的風險:

  • 部份基金可涉及投資、市場、股票投資、流動性、交易對手、證券借貸及外幣風險及小型及/或中型公司的相關風險。
  • 部份基金所涉及投資於新興市場的風險包括政治、經濟、法律、規管、市場、結算、執行交易、交易對手及貨幣風險。
  • 部份基金可透過合格境外機構投資者("QFII")及/或 人民幣合格境外機構投資者 ("RQFII")及/或 滬港通計劃直接投資於中國A股,當中涉及額外的結算、規管、營運、交易對手及流動性風險。
  • 就分派股息類別,部份基金可能從資本中作出股息分派。股息分派若直接從資本中撥付,這代表投資者獲付還或提取原有投資本金的部份金額或原有投資應佔的任何資本收益,該等分派可能導致基金的每股資產淨值即時減少。
  • 部份基金投資可能集中在單一地區/單一國家/相同行業及/或相同主題營運。 因此,基金的價值可能會較為波動。
  • 部份基金使用的任何量化技巧可能無效,可能對基金的價值構成不利影響。
  • 除了投資、市場、流動性、交易對手、證券借貸、(反向)回購協議及外幣風險,部份基金可涉及定息收入投資有關的風險包括信貨風險、利率風險、可換股債券的風險、資產抵押證券的的風險、投資於非投資級別或不獲評級證券的風險及投資於未達投資級別主權證券的風險。
  • 部份基金可大量運用金融衍生工具。荷寶環球消費新趨勢股票可為對沖目的及為有效投資組合管理而運用金融衍生工具。運用金融衍生工具可涉及較高的交易對手、流通性及估值的風險。在不利的情況下,部份基金可能會因為使用金融衍生工具而承受重大虧損(甚至損失基金資產的全部)。
  • 荷寶歐洲高收益債券可涉及投資歐元區的風險。
  • 投資者在Robeco Capital Growth Funds的投資有可能大幅虧損。投資者應該參閱Robeco Capital Growth Funds之銷售文件內的資料﹙包括潛在風險﹚,而不應只根據這文件內的資料而作出投資。

3. 當地的法律及銷售限制




4. 使用此網站



5. 投資表現



6. 第三者網站

本網站含有來自第三方的資料或第三方經營的網站連結,而其中部分該等公司與荷寶沒有任何聯繫。跟隨連結登入任何其他此網站以外的網頁或第三方網站的風險,應由跟隨該連結的人士自行承擔。荷寶並無審閱此網站所連結或提述的任何網站,概不就該等網站的內容或所提供的產品、服務或其他項目作出推許或負上任何責任。荷寶概不就使用或依賴第三方網站所載的資料而導致的任何虧損或損毀負上法侓責任,包括(但不限於)任何虧損或利益或任何其他直接或間接的損毀。 此網站以外的網頁或第三方網站皆旨在作參考之用。

7. 責任限制




8. 知識產權


9. 私隠

荷寶保證將會根據現行的資料保障法例,以保密方式處理登入此網站的人士的數據。除非荷寶需按法律責任行事,否則在未經登入此網站的人士許可,不會向第三方提供該等數據。 請於我們的私隱及Cookie政策 中查找更多詳情。 

10. 適用法律


如果您已閱讀並理解本頁並同意上述免責聲明以及同意荷寶收集和使用您的個人資料,用於私隱及Cookie政策 所列的收集和使用個人資料的目的(包括用於直接推廣荷寶的產品或服務),請點擊“我同意”按鈕。否則,請點擊“我不同意”離開本網站。