

Europe powers up its push for energy security
Europe’s latest energy shock has again exposed its continued fossil import dependence, but will accelerate the structural shift toward electrification with massive grid and infrastructure capex set to drive a decade long investment cycle.
概要
- Middle East conflict exposes Europe’s fossil fuel import dependence again
- Urgency boosts giant capex plans to upgrade grids and networks
- Grid equipment suppliers, industrial electrification leaders, regulated networks and gas majors are likely to benefit
The recent Middle East conflict, and the subsequent closure of the Strait of Hormuz, has dramatically underscored Europe's continued vulnerability to fossil fuel import disruptions. While Europe has diversified away from Russian gas since 2022, it remains heavily dependent on global energy corridors, with the current shock leading to price volatility and a renewed energy security push across the continent. To address this, both the EU and national governments are accelerating strategies focusing on electrification and breaking the cycle of dependency. This should lead to higher and faster investments into areas like grid infrastructure, electrifying industrial processes and, as a transition fuel, natural gas. This presents attractive investment opportunities in companies exposed to what is shaping up to be a decade-long investment cycle.
Close to 60% of European energy consumption still comes from fossil fuels (petroleum, gas, coal). Electricity on the other hand, still only accounts for less than a quarter.
Figure 1: Final energy consumption in Europe for 2024

Source: Eurostat - Energy in Europe – 2026 edition
The vast majority (>80%) of fossil fuels are imported from the UK, Norway, US, Middle Eastern and Northern African countries, Russia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.1 As a result, Europe spends between EUR 300-400 bln (approximately 2-3% of GDP) annually on fossil fuel imports. This leaves Europe in a position of significant economic dependence on the countries from which it imports fossil fuels. For example, the Strait of Hormuz crisis is expected to lead to a projected 25% increase in European natural gas prices in 2026, which is likely to weigh on domestic economic output and consumption.2
Network infrastructure requires most investment
To break that dependency, Europe needs to electrify. The European Commission estimates that EUR 660 bln in annual investment will be needed from now to 2030 to reach the continent’s energy transition targets. Roughly half of that needs to go into network expansion. The European Commission estimates that around EUR 584 bln in grid investment is required to accommodate a projected ~60% rise in electricity consumption from 2023 to 2030 and to renew ageing distribution grids (~40% of EU distribution grids are more than 40 years old). The remainder is split between the expansion of renewable power generation (onshore and offshore wind, solar, and battery storage), nuclear (lifetime extensions and new builds), electrified end-use (EV charging, heat pumps, industrial process electrification), and clean fuel infrastructure (hydrogen, biomethane, sustainable aviation fuels). The bottleneck, however, clearly lies in transmission. More than half of the transmission projects required by 2030 are still awaiting permits with roughly 1,700 GW of renewable capacity currently stuck in connection queues across 16 European countries.
Regulatory support is gathering pace
Public funds alone cannot close this gap. EU instruments – the Recovery and Resilience Facility, the Innovation Fund, the European Hydrogen Bank, and member-state budgets – provide an important anchor, but the bulk of the EUR 660 billion will need to come from private investors. To attract private investment, the European Commission has put forward a new action plan ‘AccelerateEU’. The plan’s clear aim is to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and accelerate the transition toward an electric future. For investors, three elements stand out. 3
A binding electrification target to be embedded in the Electrification Action Plan, with the explicit objective of lifting electricity's share of Europe’s final energy consumption from under a quarter today toward levels that displace fossil end-uses in industry, transport and buildings. An ambitious electrification target will set the pace for national policy making and is likely to result in new legislation to accelerate electrification on a local level. Greece, for example, has already passed a law which introduces binding permitting deadlines for renewable energy projects and designates Renewable Energy Acceleration Areas to speed up deployment. 4
Simplifying grid investments: a legislative vehicle to streamline permitting, which currently averages more than five years for cross-border projects, to harmonize cross-border planning, and to mobilize the EUR 584 bln grid investment required.
Concrete deployment commitments: scale battery storage capacity from 55 GW to 200 GW and increase heat pump installations from around 23 mln to 60 mln cumulatively by 2030 (the latter is from the existing REPowerEU framework).
獲取最新市場觀點
訂閱我們的電子報,時刻把握投資資訊和專家分析。
We see a decade-long tailwind for electrification
This signals an increasingly favorable regulatory backdrop that we believe represents a decade-long tailwind for electrification. We have identified four key verticals that we think will be the primary beneficiaries of that investment cycle.
Suppliers of components for grid expansion: The most agnostic way to play the theme is to invest in the companies supplying the physical building blocks of the grid, such as transformers, switchgear, cables, protection systems and power electronics. Every incremental gigawatt of solar, offshore wind, nuclear or storage capacity flows through the same hardware, which means equipment suppliers benefit regardless of which generation technology ultimately dominates the mix. With EUR 584 bln of grid investment required by 2030, 40% of European distribution networks close to end-of-life, and electricity consumption set to rise ~60% this decade, it seems safe to assume that demand will remain strong. At the same time capacity remains tight with lead times for large power transformers now exceeding three years. This suggests strong pricing power and full order books at European leaders such as Schneider Electric, Siemens Energy and Prysmian*. The grid is the bottleneck of the energy transition, and its component suppliers seem best positioned to benefit from that cycle.
Enablers of industrial electrification: The electrification of industrial production means swapping gas boilers for industrial heat pumps, combustion processes for electric arc and induction, and standalone factories for microgrid-connected sites. Schneider Electric, Siemens and ABB* are likely beneficiaries. Their portfolios span switchgear, drives, solid-state power electronics, protection systems and the software layer that orchestrates them, and they already serve the installed base they will now be asked to upgrade. The thesis is reinforced by two converging drivers of demand. Reshoring and the EU's industrial competitiveness agenda are driving fresh capex into European manufacturing footprints, while the AI and datacenter build-out pulls the same product catalogue. The result is rare in European industrials: structural top-line growth, pricing discipline supported by tight supply.
Regulated grid operators: As Europe's energy mix shifts structurally toward renewables, capital is migrating from upstream fossil energy to regulated networks. Grid operators like National Grid and E.ON* are therefore a direct beneficiary of the European capex super-cycle. They earn an allowed return on a regulated asset base (RAB) that grows in lockstep with capex, meaning a doubling of investment translates almost mechanically into a doubling of the earnings base. With EUR 584 billion of grid investment required by 2030 and most national regulators having reset allowed returns higher to reflect the new rate environment, unlike renewable developers (which are exposed to power prices, merchant risk and supply chain volatility), regulated grid operators offer contracted, inflation-linked returns underwritten by national regulators.
Natural gas: The transition away from fossil fuels will require natural gas. The latter represents a stable and reliable source of base electricity. Both the Ukraine and Middle East conflicts have however illustrated the need to diversify the sourcing of natural gas. This drives more demand for natural gas globally, which has led to an increase in natural gas supply. As supply of natural gas becomes more fragmented globally, more infrastructure will be needed to distribute that gas globally. Shell and Equinor* are major players in natural gas and both derive roughly half of group earnings from it. Technip Energies* is a leader in energy infrastructure engineering and projects and is positioned to benefit from investments in the space.
Figure 2: An expanding opportunity set

Source: Robeco, June 2026
*These are not buy, sell, or hold recommendations. These companies are shown for illustrative purposes only. Future inclusion of these securities in the strategy is not guaranteed, nor can their future performance be predicted.
Footnotes
1 Where does the EU get its oil from? - The European Council – April 2026
2 Commodity Markets Outlook – World Bank – April 2026
3 AccelerateEU to strengthen EU energy resilience – European Commission – April 2026
4 Law 5299/2026, "Acceleration of the Energy Transition through the Designation of Renewable Energy Acceleration Areas and Other Provisions"
重要資料
本網站僅供《證券及期貨條例》(香港法例第571章)及其附屬法例所界定之專業投資者瀏覽及使用。 投資涉及風險。過往表現並不代表未來表現。本網站所載資料僅供參考之用,並不構成任何投資建議,亦非作出買賣任何證券或採納任何投資策略之要約或招攬。投資者不應僅憑本網站提供之資料作出投資決定,在作出任何投資決定前,應徵詢獨立意見(包括有關稅務影響之意見)。投資者應確保完全理解投資產品的相關風險,亦應考量自身投資目標及風險承受水平。投資乃閣下之個人決定。除非銷售投資產品的中介人已向閣下告知該投資產品適合閣下,並已解釋其符合閣下投資目標之原因,否則閣下不應投資。請參閱相關發售文件或其他法律文件,以獲取包括風險因素在內的進一步詳情。 本網站由荷寶投資管理香港有限公司發布,該公司受香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(「證監會」)規管(中央編號:APU851)。本網站未經證監會審閱。 無法保證任何投資產品可實現其投資目標。概不就任何投資產品之表現或投資回報作任何聲明或承諾。投資的價值或會波動。本網站所載過往表現、推算或預測,均不應視作未來表現之保證或指標,且概不提供任何明示或暗示之保證。本網站內容建基於相信為可靠之來源,惟因應資料傳遞技術特性及須採用多項數據來源(包括第三方內容),故概不保證其準確性。所述觀點僅乃截至上述日期,或會隨市況變化而改變,可予更改而毋須另行通知。該等意見可能有別於其他荷寶投資專業人士之意見。因使用本材料或當中所載任何評論、意見或估算而引致之直接、間接或相應損失,荷寶概不承擔法律責任。荷寶並無責任更新本網站或任何網站內容。未經荷寶事先書面許可,不得複製、分發或刊發本網站任何材料。 除非另有說明,資料來源:荷寶。



























