Disclaimer

Confermo di essere un cliente professionale

Le informazioni e le opinioni contenute in questa sezione del Sito cui sta accedendo sono destinate esclusivamente a Clienti Professionali come definiti dal Regolamento Consob n. 16190 del 29 ottobre 2007 (articolo 26 e Allegato 3) e dalla Direttiva CE n. 2004/39 (Allegato II), e sono concepite ad uso esclusivo di tali categorie di soggetti. Ne è vietata la divulgazione, anche solo parziale.

Al fine di accedere a tale sezione riservata, si prega di confermare di essere un  Cliente Professionale, declinando Robeco qualsivoglia responsabilità in caso di accesso effettuato da una persona che non sia un cliente professionale.

In ogni caso, le informazioni e le opinioni ivi contenute non costituiscono un'offerta o una sollecitazione all'investimento e non costituiscono una raccomandazione o consiglio, anche di carattere fiscale, o un'offerta, finalizzate all'investimento, e non devono in alcun caso essere interpretate come tali.

Prima di  ogni investimento, per una descrizione dettagliata delle caratteristiche, dei rischi e degli oneri connessi, si raccomanda di esaminare il Prospetto, i KIIDs delle classi autorizzate per la commercializzazione in Italia, la relazione annuale o semestrale e lo Statuto, disponibili sul presente Sito o presso i collocatori.
L’investimento in prodotti finanziari è soggetto a fluttuazioni, con conseguente variazione al rialzo o al ribasso dei prezzi, ed è possibile che non si riesca a recuperare l'importo originariamente investito.

Confermo che sono un cliente professionale:
Rifiuto
Review: 'The Entrepreneurial State'

Review: 'The Entrepreneurial State'

12-01-2016 | Visione

How innovative should governments be? Very innovative, according to Mariana Mazzucato. Robeco’s chief economist Léon Cornelissen reviews her book The Entrepreneurial State.

  • Léon  Cornelissen
    Léon
    Cornelissen
    Chief Economist

Speed read

  • Government is the driving force behind major, innovative programs 
  • Without government investment, the iPhone would be little more than a gadget today 
  • European governments should follow the US approach

"The IMF should stop forecasting renewed growth and issue a warning that the global economy will remain weak and vulnerable unless world leaders act energetically to spur innovation and growth. Such an effort is long overdue," laments Ashoka Mody of the Bruegel think tank in his blog entitled ‘Another slow year for the global economy’, dated January 5.

Mariana Mazzucato, Professor in the Economics of Innovation at the UK’s University of Sussex is undoubtedly in complete agreement with him. In her engaging, sometimes amusing and controversial book The Entrepreneurial State she emphasizes the importance of government as the boldest and most valuable innovator.

Mazzucato is right to emphasize that although the pragmatic United States talks about little government interference and free markets, their large public investment programs in technology and innovation are actually why they are so successful. From internet, biotechnology, nanotechnology to shale gas, the government plays a key role in achieving innovation-driven growth.

Scopri gli ultimi approfondimenti
Abbonati

Smartphone thanks to the government

An interesting example is the separate chapter on Apple. This is a company that understandably promotes the myth that it is primarily qualities like individual genius, eye for design, playfulness and even madness that are responsible for revolutionary products like the iPad and the iPhone. But without the large-scale government investment which made the internet and computer revolution possible, this would have only resulted in a new gadget and not in products that have drastically changed the way we work and communicate, argues Mazzucato.

One ironic detail is that Apple does not publish impressive R&D figures. But this is understandable because it does not focus its inventiveness on developing new technologies and components, but on integrating these into an innovative architecture. However, it is less ironic that the US government sees little in return for the investments that have actually made the iPhone so smart.

Mazzucato states that it is no coincidence that the weakest countries in the Eurozone are those that spend the least on R&D and promoting human capital. Yet these countries are also accused of spending too much. But to copy the American model you have to look at what they do, not at what they say. Smart, inclusive and sustainable growth doesn't just happen on its own.

Gli argomenti collegati a questo articolo sono: