Positive link to sector performance
Robeco developed a unique approach in 2018 to screen for UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which is applied across a range of Robeco strategies. Last year, the initial analysis showed that sectors which were positively aligned with the SDGs had lower credit risk and that, over a five-year period, sectors with a positive or neutral SDG rating had a superior risk-return relationship compared to those with negative SDG scores.
With the SDG Credit strategies now having developed a track record, the next step of evaluating results at the portfolio level was taken, to determine how the SDG measurement framework adds value in practice. In particular, the results were assessed in the wake of the Covid-19-related market and economic crisis.
Figure 1 | Investment grade credit: risk-return, five-year history
Source: Barclays, and Robeco calculations based on the global IG universe. Data up to August 2019, five-year history. The above chart is for illustrative purposes and does not represent the performance of any specific Robeco investment strategy.
Holding strong during Covid-19 crisis
Following a positive start, 2020 has proven to be unprecedented, with a dramatic sell-off in global credit markets in response to the Covid-19 crisis and then a strong rebound in credit markets since the end of March. Spreads moved from late bull market tights to recessionary levels in both investment grade and high yield within just four weeks. Quick and decisive action by governments and central banks prompted a substantial tightening in credit markets in the second and third quarter. The Global Investment Grade Credit Index1 declined by -6.07% (EUR) in March, contributing to the first-quarter decline of -3.6%. The subsequent recovery resulted in a +7.57% (EUR) return in the second quarter and a more tempered gain of +1.49% (EUR) in the third quarter.
Detailed attribution analysis at the portfolio level shows that Robeco’s SDG credit screening methodology contributed to positive results during the height of the crisis and in the months that followed.
Performance of the RobecoSAM Global SDG Credits strategy
The RobecoSAM Global SDG Credits strategy has outperformed2he Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Corporate Index over the year to date. An outperformance of +103 basis points in the first quarter, +149 bps in the second quarter and +31 bps in the third quarter, takes the year-to-date outperformance to +292 basis points (DH EUR share class, gross of fees). Since inception in June 2018, the strategy has outperformed the index by 181 basis points per annum, and the cumulative outperformance over this period was 457 basis points (DH EUR share class, gross of fees).
Attribution analysis shows that a quarter of this cumulative outperformance is directly attributed to the SDG screening, through avoiding the bad names. In particular, the findings show:
Avoiding names with negative SDG scores contributed 68 basis points cumulatively over the period since June 2018. This included avoiding some large integrated oil and gas companies that have a negative SDG score, avoiding the bigger automotive manufacturers with little or no revenues from electric vehicle sales and not being exposed to some of the sizeable, well-known utilities and banks with a negative SDG score. Amongst banks, for example, we avoided exposure to those with negative SDG scores owing to concerns related to corporate conduct.
Of the outperformance, 38 basis points is linked to favoring companies with a positive SDG contribution. Robeco’s SDG methodology led to the inclusion of a number of firms due to their positive SDG scores for business practices – amongst others, an Indian and US telecoms operator and a US technology company. These SDG-related selections contributed to the overall outperformance.
Beyond the SDG screening process, there is also a strong contribution from issuer selection, totaling 161 basis points since June 2018. This is support for our conviction that SDG screening does not hinder our ability to generate performance through bottom-up issuer selection, which is an important performance driver in all our credit capabilities.
Performance of the RobecoSAM Euro SDG Credits strategy
SDG screening was implemented for the RobecoSAM Euro SDG Credits strategy in January 2019. Over the period January 2019 to September 2020, the strategy outperformed3 the Bloomberg Barclays Euro Aggregate Corporate Index by +113 basis points. A similar outcome is seen here with regard to the contribution of the SDG screening to relative performance, albeit over a shorter period.
The SDG screening added 68 basis points, with equal contributions from avoiding names with a negative SDG score and being overweight in names with a positive SDG score. A strong contribution from issuer selection is evident here, too, at 79 basis points.
How the SDG screening works
Robeco selects the SDG-eligible universe of credits using its proprietary SDG screening methodology, which was developed in 2018. This process of screening companies and giving each an SDG score comprises three steps: establish how the products or services produced by the company contribute in a positive or negative way to the SDGs, analyze how the company’s conduct contributes to the SDGs, and determine whether it is or has been involved in any controversies and, if so, whether measures have been taken by the management to prevent this from reoccurring. The SDG scores range from +3 to -3. Only bonds with a positive or neutral SDG score are eligible for inclusion in the portfolio; those with a negative score are excluded from further consideration.
This is an updated version of an article that was published in April 2020.Download the paper
1Global Investment Grade Credit Index: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Corporate Index.
2Source: Robeco. RobecoSAM Global SDG Credits DH EUR, gross of fees, based on gross asset value. Benchmark: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Corporate. In reality, management fees and other costs are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown. The value of your investments may fluctuate. Results obtained in the past are no guarantee for the future.
3Source: Robeco. RobecoSAM Euro SDG Credits, gross of fees, based on gross asset value. In reality, management fees and other costs are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown. Periods shorter than one year are not annualized. The value of your investments may fluctuate. Results obtained in the past are no guarantee for the future.
当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。 ご契約に際しては、必要に応じ専門家にご相談の上、最終的なご判断はお客様ご自身でなさるようお願い致します。 運用を行う資産の評価額は、組入有価証券等の価格、金融市場の相場や金利等の変動、及び組入有価証券の発行体の財務状況による信用力等の影響を受けて変動します。また、外貨建資産に投資する場合は為替変動の影響も受けます。運用によって生じた損益は、全て投資家の皆様に帰属します。したがって投資元本や一定の運用成果が保証されているものではなく、投資元本を上回る損失を被ることがあります。弊社が行う金融商品取引業に係る手数料または報酬は、締結される契約の種類や契約資産額により異なるため、当資料において記載せず別途ご提示させて頂く場合があります。具体的な手数料または報酬の金額・計算方法につきましては弊社担当者へお問合せください。 当資料及び記載されている情報、商品に関する権利は弊社に帰属します。したがって、弊社の書面による同意なくしてその全部もしくは一部を複製またはその他の方法で配布することはご遠慮ください。 商号等： ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社 金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長（金商）第２７８０号 加入協会： 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会