

The new scarcity: Diversification
Diversifying portfolios is becoming more difficult as asset classes move in the same direction, and while equities are dominated by Big Tech, Robeco’s multi-asset team says.
概括
- The negative correlation between equities and bonds has disappeared
- Investors should blend quant and fundamental techniques to find winners
- Consider alternative sectors like commodities, small caps, and EMD
A high correlation between stocks and bonds means switching from one to the other does not offer the risk/return diversification that it once did, says Mathieu van Roon, Portfolio Manager with the Investment Solutions Multi-Asset team.
Meanwhile, the mega-cap concentration within stocks, as only a handful of Magnificent Seven and other tech companies account for the bulk of market returns, presents poor diversification opportunities within the same asset class.
Instead, investors should look at the more unloved parts of the market, including private equity replication strategies, commodities, small-caps, and emerging market debt, Van Roon says.
“For decades, multi-asset investing meant balancing equities and bonds in a traditional 60-40 portfolio,” Van Roon says. “This also proved useful when equities and bonds moved in different directions; when stocks went down, bonds went up, and vice versa. That worked when diversification was abundant and economic regimes were stable.”
“Today, geopolitical uncertainty, inflation and technological disruption mean investors can no longer rely on a simple two-asset portfolio. Even as markets reach new highs, portfolios have become increasingly concentrated around a narrow set of risk drivers.”
“Technology dominates global equity markets. A handful of mega-cap companies drive an ever-larger share of developed market returns, while emerging markets are increasingly exposed through semiconductors, AI infrastructure and digital platforms. As a result, many investors may be less diversified than they realise.”
Moving together in tandem
The negative correlation between equities and bonds has not been present in recent years, particularly since the war in Ukraine began in 2022, remaining a positive correlation until 2025. The negative correlation resumed in 2025 but it has now turned positive again in 2026.
Figure 1: The relationship between global equities and US Treasuries since 2000

Source: Robeco, Bloomberg, July 2026
“Meanwhile, globalization is giving way to geopolitical rivalry, supply-chain reshoring and greater policy fragmentation,” Van Roon says. “Corporate credit spreads also remain close to historic lows, leaving investors with limited compensation for taking additional credit risk.”
“There is no silver bullet, but investors can take steps to reduce portfolio concentration. Core equity and credit allocations can be worked harder to deliver more consistent returns, rather than the traditional method of merely mixing various investment styles.”
獲取最新市場觀點
訂閱我們的電子報,時刻把握投資資訊和專家分析。
Combining quant with fundamental
Instead of simply blending equity and credit styles between value and growth, a new paradigm is emerging – combining quantitative and fundamental investing – says Jonathan Arthur, Client Portfolio Manager with the team.
“Quant investing identifies opportunities across large datasets, while fundamental investing provides forward-looking insights and economic judgement,” he says. “Together, they create a more balanced risk/return profile across market cycles with less tail risk. This ‘dual alpha’ approach can strengthen both core equity and core credit portfolios.”
“Next, investors more than ever need to look beyond today’s high-momentum trades and have the conviction and open mindedness to search for longer-term winners. This naturally broadens the investment universe beyond traditional equity and bond allocations to include more outspoken regional tilts, and by adding emerging market debt, small caps, commodities, and alternative return sources.”
Core and satellite allocations
The multi-asset team does this for Robeco portfolios by implementing satellite allocations around a core portfolio structure. The core provides broad market exposure and forms the long-term foundation of the portfolio. Around that foundation, satellite allocations introduce differentiated sources of return that can complement traditional stock and bond holdings.
“Examples of these satellites include listed private equity replication strategies, which seek to capture many of the attractive characteristics of private markets while maintaining the liquidity and transparency of public markets,” Arthur says.
“Commodities have helped during recent periods of inflation surprises or supply disruptions, and we believe they are a main stay of the portfolios during various market cycles. Emerging market debt provides exposure to different growth dynamics and income opportunities, with a risk profile that is much more corporate credit-like, but with returns that are comparable to high yield.”
Targeting long-term themes
“Global small caps trade at historically attractive valuations, and the recent softening in rate-path expectations may act as a catalyst for greater investor interest in this somewhat unloved part of the market.”
Satellite allocations can also target long-term structural themes, Van Roon says. “While AI and digitalization dominate investor attention today, thematic leadership rarely remains constant,” he says.
“Clean technology, for example, has regained momentum as policy support during the recent Iran crisis when oil supply routes were shut off, lower financing costs and rising electricity demand have improved its outlook.”
Seeking multiple return sources
“Other overlooked themes may follow. Water infrastructure benefits from increasing scarcity and aging networks, while healthcare innovation is driven by demographic trends and scientific breakthroughs. The objective is to maintain exposure to multiple long-term trends as leadership evolves over time.”
“The years ahead are unlikely to be defined by one region, asset class or technology theme,” Arthur adds. “Instead, investors face greater uncertainty, wider performance dispersion and more frequent market rotations.”
“Portfolios with multiple sources of return are likely to be better positioned to capture opportunities and manage risk. Looking forward, diversification may become one of the most important drivers of investment success.”
免责声明:
本文由荷宝私募基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况, 荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。






























