

Can the ECB manage Europe's second inflation test?
While structurally better prepared than in 2022, the latest energy shock is testing the ECB’s ability to balance inflation risks with a softening growth outlook.
概要
- ECB better positioned, but energy still a risk
- Shock transmitted via rates; markets stabilizing
- Diverging paths across central banks
The ECB enters the current energy shock from a position of relative strength. Inflation is close to target, policy rates are around neutral, and the labor market is cooler than during the 2022 episode. This has been reflected in a gradual cooling of wage demands prior to the jump in energy prices.
So far, inflation expectations remain relatively well anchored. Market-based measures have reacted only modestly, with the 5y5y forward rising slightly, while manufacturing selling-price expectations – although increasing – remain well below 2022 levels. We believe this suggests that, from an inflation perspective, the euro area is better positioned to absorb an energy shock than it was during the previous cycle.
From a growth perspective, the current shock comes at a more delicate stage of the cycle. The post-Covid surge in consumer demand has faded, and early data point to modest economic momentum before the Iran war started. Higher energy prices can take a significant bite out of disposable incomes, especially for lower- and middle-income households.
So far, inflation expectations remain relatively well anchored
An analysis of previous energy price shocks, published by ECB staff, suggests that a 10% energy price shock could reduce consumer spending on essential items for these households by circa 0.4 percentage points. Business sentiment is probably also not immune to energy price shocks. Past experience suggests a negative impact on business fixed investment of circa 1.5 percentage points spread over a two-year period.
Figure 1 – Expected impact from 10% energy price shock on Eurozone growth (percentage point change from baseline)

Source: Bloomberg, Robeco, 11 April 2026
The growth impulse from additional fiscal spending to support European defense and German infrastructure thus appears to come at a good moment. It should at least help to prevent a scenario in which growth falls below 0.5%, while the consensus growth expectation for 2026 was 1.2% at the start of the year.
Energy prices remain the key uncertainty, with Brent for December currently hovering around USD 85 per barrel. A sustained period at these levels risks feeding into inflation expectations and firms’ pricing behavior, particularly as the ECB continues to monitor wage dynamics and supply-side pressures.
While the inflation impulse is less acute than in 2022, the combination of elevated energy prices and weaker growth creates a more challenging policy trade-off.
獲取最新市場觀點
訂閱我們的電子報,時刻把握投資資訊和專家分析。
What this means for the ECB path
In today’s environment, the ECB appears to have more room for patience than in 2022. If energy prices stabilize around current levels, the most likely outcome is a pause in April, followed by gradual tightening starting in June.
However, the path remains highly conditional on energy developments. A renewed increase in prices would likely push the ECB toward a more aggressive hiking cycle, while a decline, particularly below USD 75 per barrel, could remove the need for further tightening.
Importantly, pushing the depo rate materially above 2.5% may prove difficult to sustain. The economic damage caused by restrictive monetary policy would increase the risk of subsequent rate cuts.
Market implications
The primary transmission channel of the energy shock has been through rates, with Bund yields moving higher and the yield curve flattening as markets price a shift toward a more hawkish stance.
Looking ahead, there appears to be room for some relief in Bunds after the recent selloff. Still, the scope for a sustained rally appears limited, with yields unlikely to fall significantly below recent ranges. The shift toward a hiking bias for the ECB suggests further flattening pressure on the curve, albeit with some room for tactical re-steepening at the long end.
Overall, the pattern resembles a rates-led adjustment, driven primarily by higher energy prices, with broader risk assets showing greater resilience as geopolitical risks ease.
重要資料
本網站僅供《證券及期貨條例》(香港法例第571章)及其附屬法例所界定之專業投資者瀏覽及使用。 投資涉及風險。過往表現並不代表未來表現。本網站所載資料僅供參考之用,並不構成任何投資建議,亦非作出買賣任何證券或採納任何投資策略之要約或招攬。投資者不應僅憑本網站提供之資料作出投資決定,在作出任何投資決定前,應徵詢獨立意見(包括有關稅務影響之意見)。投資者應確保完全理解投資產品的相關風險,亦應考量自身投資目標及風險承受水平。投資乃閣下之個人決定。除非銷售投資產品的中介人已向閣下告知該投資產品適合閣下,並已解釋其符合閣下投資目標之原因,否則閣下不應投資。請參閱相關發售文件或其他法律文件,以獲取包括風險因素在內的進一步詳情。 本網站由荷寶投資管理香港有限公司發布,該公司受香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(「證監會」)規管(中央編號:APU851)。本網站未經證監會審閱。 無法保證任何投資產品可實現其投資目標。概不就任何投資產品之表現或投資回報作任何聲明或承諾。投資的價值或會波動。本網站所載過往表現、推算或預測,均不應視作未來表現之保證或指標,且概不提供任何明示或暗示之保證。本網站內容建基於相信為可靠之來源,惟因應資料傳遞技術特性及須採用多項數據來源(包括第三方內容),故概不保證其準確性。所述觀點僅乃截至上述日期,或會隨市況變化而改變,可予更改而毋須另行通知。該等意見可能有別於其他荷寶投資專業人士之意見。因使用本材料或當中所載任何評論、意見或估算而引致之直接、間接或相應損失,荷寶概不承擔法律責任。荷寶並無責任更新本網站或任何網站內容。未經荷寶事先書面許可,不得複製、分發或刊發本網站任何材料。 除非另有說明,資料來源:荷寶。































