Since the Paris Agreement, awareness of climate change has dramatically increased, especially as once-distant risks materialize into increasingly catastrophic events. Hinged between regulatory restrictions and departing customers, companies that don’t act fast enough risk low valuations at best and extinction at worst.
Investors are also exposed. Portfolios with high-emission holdings are subject to transition risks and serious mid- to long-term losses. But simply purging portfolios of carbon-intensive sectors is also not the most effective sustainable investing strategy. Without slashing emissions from high-emitting sectors, the world will never reach net zero. Divestment also deprives investors of opportunities to contribute to the clean and green-focused innovation of companies as they race to decarbonize and participate in the growth and returns their transition will bring.
The Robeco approach
Acknowledging that holding heavy emitters brings both risks and benefits, Robeco favors a “best-in-sector” approach – identifying companies that are outperforming sector peers in cutting future carbon emissions through 2050. Robeco’s SDP series models and tracks the carbon-cutting performance of companies within sectors in order to distinguish future sector leaders from likely laggards.
Most companies have pledged to cut emissions, yet fulfilling those commitments in a credible and timely manner is a whole other mountain. Complicating matters further, for some sectors decarbonization performance is largely tied to reductions in Scope 3 emissions (emissions from consumer use rather than product manufacturing). That’s a game changer as until now even Big Oil could score relatively well on environmental footprint metrics based on (largely operational) Scope 1 and 2 emissions data.
Though models differ slightly based on sector-specific factors, their essential features include: a decarbonization performance assessment that charts a company’s emission reductions trajectory and a financial assessment that measures a company’s operational and financial capacity to meet decarbonization targets, as well as analyses on the financial impact of regulatory mandates.
The SDP methodology
Guided by climate and emissions scenarios from the world’s foremost climate-science authorities, SI researchers construct a company’s decarbonization pathway through 2050 using backward and forward-looking emissions data1 (company-disclosed and projected estimates). Companies’ decarbonization pathways are then compared with scientifically modelled, sector-specific benchmark trajectories as well as sector peers to evaluate which companies are most closely aligned. Decarbonization scores are then assigned to each company according to their degree of alignment. The closer the alignment, the better the score. Timing also matters; emission reductions in the short and mid-term count more than those in the long-term, meaning that the scores of companies planning to cut emission intensities earlier rather than later will be higher.
Figure 1 | Comparing an O&G company’s commitments with science-backed targets
Source: Robeco model as of December 2022
The blue dotted line indicates Company A’s Commitment Pathway based on its planned emission reduction disclosures. The orange line indicates the scientifically modelled benchmark for the oil and gas sector in order to keep global temperatures below 2 °C by 2050 (the TPI Below 2 °C Pathway (or TPI B2DS). The closer the alignment between pathways, the better a company’s decarbonization score.2
True leadership, however, demands plans that are both ambitious and credible. To measure credibility, SI analysts calculate the required level of investment (both capital and operational expenditures) needed to achieve the company’s disclosed decarbonization pathway and compare those to the company’s current and projected capex investments into carbon abatement technologies (e.g., battery electric vehicle production for the automotive sector, clean and renewable energy generation for oil and gas). Severe shortfalls in capex spending cast doubt on a company’s intention or even ability to cut future emissions and reach its own or regulatory emission targets.
Finally, the model assesses the financial impact of regulatory fines, stranded assets and demand reduction – critical threats for carbon-intensive industries. Though insignificant at present, the financial impact of fines on revenues (and valuations) will intensify as regulations are tightened and the reputations of lagging companies are damaged.
But for oil and gas companies in particular, fines will be negligible compared to revenue loss from drastically reduced demand, as governments unleash a blitzkrieg on heavy emitters in order to make good on net-zero pledges. A critical feature of the O&G SDP is that it captures the economic impact of reduced demand and write-downs on capital assets (e.g., plants, property and equipment) on future enterprise value.
SDP models allows Robeco to pinpoint where companies are in the transition and where they are most likely to be in the decades ahead. As a result, we can better anticipate future emissions performance against sector peers, estimate future cash flows, and more accurately calculate the fair value and risk-return potential of stocks and bond issues. And with automation, SDP models enable analysts to construct and assess the short-, mid- and long-term decarbonization performance of thousands of companies across product universes and asset classes.
Moreover, the SDP assessment’s granular analysis provides our engagement specialists with objective, specific and quantified data on a companies’ decarbonization performance relative to peers – powerful ammunition for prioritizing, driving, and accelerating engagement activities among slow movers.
Pathways have been constructed for the economy’s most carbon-intensive sectors including oil and gas, automotive, meat production, cement and aluminum manufacturing, real estate and power generation. The SDPs are the latest in Robeco’s pioneering innovations that continue to advance sustainable investing and achieve real-world impact through objective data, rigorous analysis and consistent frameworks.Click here to download Robeco’s SDP for the Automotive sector Click here to download Robeco’s SDP for the Oil & Gas sector
1 More specifically, in order to account for differences in company size and future growth, analysts measure reductions in CO2-emission intensities rather than absolute CO2 emissions.
2 The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Below 2°C Benchmark Pathway was recently updated with new emission targets from the IEA as a result of the increased carbon output related to the energy crisis. While changes have not been reflected in the current graphic, they have been incorporated into Robeco’s O&G sector’s decarbonization pathway model for use by internal experts and investment teams.
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。