Insurance companies are significant investors in credits and hold capital buffers to protect their portfolios against negative events. Insurers are also always looking for the best way to diversify their investments and to enhance their return on insurance capital.
Source of diversification
Factor-based credit strategies provide an attractive alternative to traditional, fundamental, research-based credit strategies for insurers. Their differentiated investment style and their ability to utilize a broader investment universe explain why factor strategies provide an important source of diversification relative to the fundamentally managed portfolios of insurers.
A multi-factor credit strategy uses a highly systematic method to construct the portfolio, taking into account multiple quantitative factors and neutralizing the portfolio’s exposures in terms of interest rate duration and credit beta. Meanwhile, fundamental strategies typically follow only one style, often carry or value, and regularly take duration and/or beta bets.
In terms of the investment universe, a factor-based strategy can efficiently invest in all companies and bonds, irrespective of their size. Fundamental managers inevitably have to focus on a smaller subset, given their limited resources for analyzing issuers. Generally, this subset consists of the larger, more liquid names and their more recently issued bonds.
Because of these differences, while the realized returns of most fundamental strategies tend to be positively correlated, the realized returns of our factor strategies are negatively correlated with those of their fundamental peers. Adding a factor strategy to a portfolio of fundamentally managed credit strategies therefore strongly improves diversification.
Importantly, by systematically harvesting factor premiums, factor strategies can be expected to deliver both a higher risk-adjusted return and a higher return on capital than passive credit portfolios. Numerous academic studies on various asset classes, including stocks and bonds, have shown that factor portfolios deliver superior risk-adjusted returns over a full investment cycle, compared to a portfolio that passively tracks the market index.
Moreover, explicitly integrating insurance capital requirements into factor credit strategies can further enhance the return on capital. In our research, we found a strong positive correlation between the Solvency Capital Ratio and credit volatility. Therefore, a factor portfolio not only generates a higher return to volatility ratio (i.e. Sharpe ratio) than the market, but also a higher return to capital ratio.
By tilting a portfolio towards bonds that score well with regard to factors, and avoiding bonds that have poor factor scores, investors can therefore construct a portfolio that generates a higher risk-adjusted return and a higher return on capital than a portfolio that passively tracks the market.
Cost-efficient building block
Robeco’s multi-factor credit strategies offer exposure to the low-risk, quality, value, momentum and size factors. We apply enhanced definitions for each factor. Compared to more generic factor definitions, such as those typically used in academic research, these enhanced definitions lead to higher risk-adjusted returns. Our strategies also explicitly take liquidity, transaction costs and turnover into account, and construct well-diversified portfolios with a better sustainability profile than the index. They therefore offer more realistic expectations for attainable improvements in the return-on-capital ratio.
Ultimately, our factor credit strategies provide a cost-efficient building block for insurers. These strategies can also be tailored to address specific requirements, for example when insurers wish to match a liability cashflow stream or aim for a certain level of income from a low-turnover buy-and-maintain credit portfolio.
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。