japanja
Reducing the carbon intensity of multi-factor credits strategies

Reducing the carbon intensity of multi-factor credits strategies

27-05-2020 | インサイト
Quantitative investment strategies lend themselves well to integrating secondary objectives, such as reducing carbon intensity. We find that reducing the carbon intensity of the multi-factor strategies comes with only a limited reduction in outperformance.
  • Robbert-Jan 't Hoen
    Robbert-Jan
    't Hoen
    Researcher
  • Patrick  Houweling
    Patrick
    Houweling
    Co-Head of Quant Fixed Income

Speed read

  • Large differences in carbon intensities across the investment universe
  • Carbon constraint has little impact on expected performance of strategies
  • Portfolios tilt away from (companies within) carbon-intensive sectors

Integrating a carbon constraint in multi-factor credit and high yield strategies

Our research into sustainability integration in quantitative investment strategies shows that such strategies lend themselves well to integrating secondary objectives, such as reducing carbon intensity, next to the primary objective of realizing attractive risk-adjusted returns. This is due to the large investment universe that the strategy can screen for the most attractive opportunities.

If a company with high carbon emissions issues a bond with attractive factor scores, the portfolio construction algorithm is often able to find a bond with similar factor scores, but with lower carbon intensity. This efficiently tilts the portfolio towards bonds of more sustainable companies, without having to forgo a lot of factor exposure.

We assessed the performance impact of imposing a constraint on the carbon intensity of our global multi-factor credit and global multi-factor high yield strategies, over a 1994-2019 backtest period. The constraint specifies that the weighted average carbon intensity of the portfolio should be lower than that of the benchmark. The impact on the backtested performance is limited to a few basis points per annum. We have also researched more ambitious carbon reduction targets, e.g. 10% lower carbon intensity than the benchmark, or 20%, 30%, etc., and found that these are associated with modest reductions in the expected outperformance of the strategies.

Now also follow us on Instagram
Now also follow us on Instagram
Follow

Only a limited reduction in outperformance

One may wonder why reducing the carbon intensity of the multi-factor strategies comes with only a limited reduction in outperformance, even though imposing constraints in a factor strategy generally leads to lower factor exposures. We think there are three reasons for this:

  1. The distribution of carbon intensity is right-skewed, so that avoiding only a few of the most carbon-intensive companies results in a relatively large reduction in the weighted average carbon intensity of the portfolio.

  2. For large periods, the portfolios already have a lower carbon intensity than their benchmark, so that no adjustments need to be made in those periods.

  3. In the periods that the carbon intensity of the portfolios is higher than their benchmark, the large investment universe often enables the portfolio construction algorithm to replace bonds from companies with high carbon emissions with bonds that have similar factor scores, but lower carbon intensity. This efficiently tilts the portfolio towards bonds of more sustainable companies, without having to forgo a lot of factor exposure.
We believe that the described approach helps to reduce transition risks in the portfolio, while still providing attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Download the white paper with the detailed findings

ディスクレーマー

個人情報は、細心の注意をもって適切に取り扱います。事前の同意なしに第三者に提供することはありません。

重要事項

当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。

ご契約に際しては、必要に応じ専門家にご相談の上、最終的なご判断はお客様ご自身でなさるようお願い致します。

運用を行う資産の評価額は、組入有価証券等の価格、金融市場の相場や金利等の変動、及び組入有価証券の発行体の財務状況による信用力等の影響を受けて変動します。また、外貨建資産に投資する場合は為替変動の影響も受けます。運用によって生じた損益は、全て投資家の皆様に帰属します。したがって投資元本や一定の運用成果が保証されているものではなく、投資元本を上回る損失を被ることがあります。弊社が行う金融商品取引業に係る手数料または報酬は、締結される契約の種類や契約資産額により異なるため、当資料において記載せず別途ご提示させて頂く場合があります。具体的な手数料または報酬の金額・計算方法につきましては弊社担当者へお問合せください。

当資料及び記載されている情報、商品に関する権利は弊社に帰属します。したがって、弊社の書面による同意なくしてその全部もしくは一部を複製またはその他の方法で配布することはご遠慮ください。

商号等: ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社  金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長(金商)第2780号

加入協会: 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会