Decarbonization in real estate is a race against time. Governments have set the path for reduced emissions, with the goal of transitioning to a low-carbon or even carbon-neutral future. The property sector plays a significant role in this decarbonization journey, as it accounts for approximately 40% of annual global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions1. The sector is making big strides toward decarbonization, but are we close to where we need to be?
In this insight, we analyze data from companies invested in the Robeco Sustainable Property strategy and the top 200 largest listed real estate companies. For the first time, our analysis encompasses a wider range of metrics, now including scope 3 target setting, embodied carbon, and green leases2, as more companies have started disclosing information on these topics.
Scope 3 progress
It is reassuring to see that in 2021, real estate companies in our sample, which account for 87% of the weight in the S&P Global Developed Property Index, and around 1.9 trillion USD in terms of market cap, have improving GHG emissions disclosure and targets, especially for scope 3.
Table 1 | Disclosure of environmental performance, targets, and use of tools to manage GHG emissions
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.
Based on the environmental performance and Scope 1 & 2 emissions reduction targets of the companies, we project the decarbonization pathway of the benchmark and Robeco Sustainable Property strategy for the coming years.
As shown in Figure 1, by employing proprietary RobecoSAM sustainability criteria in our stock selection, the strategy’s holdings had a 35% lower weighted carbon intensity (4.72) in 2021 than the S&P Developed Property Index (7.30), demonstrating that the strategy is already better positioned for decarbonization. In 2030, the strategy‘s holdings are expected to decrease their carbon intensity even further, reaching 2.79, compared to 4.56 for the index. While the strategy’s holdings are better prepared for future regulations, the overall reduction of emissions in the property sector has to accelerate to meet Paris agreement targets.
Figure 1 | Decarbonization pathways for the S&P Developed Property Index and Sustainable Property strategy
Source: Trucost, Corporate reports, Robeco.3
2021 progress
Our analysis reveals that companies in our sample decreased their carbon emissions by 4.7%4 over 2021. From a subsector perspective, the operations of some REITs that were hit hard in 2020, namely, Diversified, Hotel & Resort, and Residential, began to recover gradually when lockdowns were lifted, benefiting from rising vaccination rates and stimulus plans. As a result, we observed an increase in absolute emissions in these sectors in 2021. On the other hand, Specialized REITs where data centers constitute a significant part, have seen a decrease in emissions. With persistent robust demand for cloud computing and data storage, it is likely that the decrease has been driven by a reduction in carbon intensity rather than a decrease in operations.
Figure 2 | Absolute carbon emissions (scope 1 & 2) per segment, 2021 versus 2020
Source: Trucost, Corporate reports, Robeco.
Energy intensity as another key factor in decarbonization
Reducing carbon emissions and improving energy efficiency are like two sides of a coin as illustrated in Figure 3. As the IEA emphasizes, “energy efficiency is one of the key ways the world can meet energy service demand with lower energy use, which is crucial in most of the IPCC GHG emissions pathways limiting global warming to 1.5oC”. 5
Figure 3 | Correlation between energy intensity and carbon intensity
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.
Table 2 presents that, in 2021, 157 companies in our sample, representing 82% of the benchmark weight, reported their energy usage, and 71 companies, representing 31% of the benchmark weight, set energy targets. However, a geographical analysis of the data (Figure 4) reveals notable variations, with Hong Kong (100%, 83%)6 and Singapore (100%, 50%) displaying higher levels of both energy use disclosure and energy intensity targets setting. Conversely, the United States (68%, 30%) and Australia/New Zealand (75%, 17%) appear to be lagging behind.
Table 2 | Disclosure of energy consumption and targets
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.
Figure 4 | Energy use disclosure and target setting by geography
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.
Energy consumption reporting and target setting is crucial. In the future, we expect binding minimum requirements of energy intensity per building to be set, with properties that fail to meet specific energy intensity levels no longer being able to be rented out, which will require large investments in retrofitting programs. While these requirements have yet to be formally imposed, related discussions are ongoing, and in some cases, energy ratings are already a prerequisite for leasing or building transactions.
Download the full paper免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。