Robeco logo

Disclaimer Robeco Switzerland Ltd.

The information contained on these pages is solely for marketing purposes.

Access to the funds is restricted to (i) Qualified Investors within the meaning of art. 10 para. 3 et sequ. of the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”), (ii) Institutional Investors within the meaning of art. 4 para. 3 and 4 of the Financial Services Act (“FinSA”) domiciled Switzerland and (iii) Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients.

The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent.

The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website https://www.robeco.com/ch.

Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of CISA and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the Robeco Switzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports.

By clicking “I agree” you confirm that you/the company you represent falls under one of the above-mentioned categories of addressees and that you have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

I Disagree

21-09-2023 · Insight

Double delight: Seizing the dual discount in emerging markets

Is now the time to seize investment opportunities in emerging markets? We believe the answer is a resounding 'Yes.'

    Authors

  • Jan de Koning - Head of Quant Client Portfolio Management

    Jan de Koning

    Head of Quant Client Portfolio Management

  • Matthias Hanauer - Researcher

    Matthias Hanauer

    Researcher

Summary

  1. Emerging markets equities offer a substantial discount over developed markets

  2. EM value strategies are currently trading at historically low valuations

  3. Robeco Quant EM strategies are designed to efficiently capture both market and factor premiums

Based on historical valuation metrics, both absolute and relative, we believe the time is ripe to seize the dual discount in emerging markets. Our recent research outlines this 'double discount' opportunity presented by emerging markets factor-based equities and highlights how Robeco Quant Equities strategies are specially designed to capture both market and factor premiums efficiently.

This change doesn't spell doom for emerging markets; rather, it highlights an underexplored 'double discount' investment opportunity

Are emerging markets the real deal?

For over a decade, developed markets have enjoyed the boon of falling interest rates, catapulting growth stocks to sky-high valuations. However, this landscape has shifted as central banks raise interest rates to combat inflation. This change doesn't spell doom for emerging markets; rather, it highlights an underexplored 'double discount' investment opportunity.

Emerging markets have suffered from an image problem, often viewed as underperforming compared to their developed counterparts, as discussed in a recent article. But this perception masks a more nuanced reality. Our data, illustrated in Figure 1, shows that emerging markets outperformed developed ones from 1999 to 2011 but have lagged since.

The data also reveals that emerging markets tend to outperform when they become relatively more expensive than developed markets and underperform when they become cheaper. Currently, the value spread between emerging and developed markets is at levels last seen 20 years ago—right when emerging markets began to outperform their developed counterparts.

Figure 1 – Relative performance and valuation of emerging markets versus developed markets (January 1996 to July 2023)

Figure  1 – Relative performance and valuation of emerging markets versus developed markets (January 1996 to July 2023)

Source: Robeco, MSCI. The figure shows the relative performance and valuation spread of the MSCI Emerging Market Index vs. the MSCI World Index. Performance is measured via the total return index, and the valuation spread is based on four bottom-up-calculated multiples (price-to-book, price-to-earnings, price-to-cash EPS, and price-to-dividend). For each multiple, the valuation ratio of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index is divided by the same valuation ratio for the MSCI World Index. The sample period is January 1996 to July 2023.

In essence, the decline of emerging markets over the past decade has been more a function of changes in relative valuation rather than deteriorating fundamentals. In fact, annual fluctuations in these valuations account for over 75% of the variation in performance between emerging and developed markets, as seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – Relative performance and valuation of emerging versus developed markets

Figure  2 – Relative performance and valuation of emerging versus developed markets

Source: Robeco, MSCI. The figure shows the relationship between the relative performance and changes in valuation spreads for the MSCI Emerging Market Index vs. the MSCI World Index. Relative performance is the continuously compounded 12-month relative performance, while the change in the valuation spread is the log of the ending value spread minus the log of the starting valuation spread. Performance is measured via the total return index and the valuation spread is based on four bottom-up-calculated multiples (price-to-book, price-to-earnings, price-to-cash EPS, and price-to-dividend). For each multiple, the valuation ratio of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index is divided by the same valuation ratio for the MSCI World Index. The sample period is January 1996 to July 2023.

How Value factors in

Within this broader landscape, value stocks in emerging markets offer a particular appeal. The valuation spread between value and growth stocks remains wider than usual, providing a fertile ground for investors.1

Figure 3 – Value trading at a historic discount in developed markets and even more so in emerging markets

Figure  3 – Value trading at a historic discount in developed markets and even more so in emerging markets

Source: Robeco, Refinitiv. The figure shows the valuation spread between the top and bottom quintile portfolios of a value strategy for developed and emerging markets. Details regarding the definition of the value strategy and the valuation spread are provided in footnote 1. The investment universe consists of constituents of the MSCI World and MSCI Emerging Markets indices. Before 2001, we use the FTSE World Developed Index for developed markets (going back to December 1985), and for emerging markets, the largest 800 constituents of the S&P Emerging BMI at the semi-annual index rebalance (going back to December 1995). The sample period is December 1985 and December 1995 to July 2023 for developed and emerging markets, respectively.

Structural and realized alpha

Why is it that despite a recent recovery in value, these stocks are still trading at a considerable discount compared to their 2018 levels? While changes in the value spread account for a significant part of the returns, they don't explain the entire picture. Read our full article on how the realized value return can be decomposed in a structural and revaluation alpha and how this decomposition can be used to form medium-term return expectations for the value factor in emerging markets. Moreover, we explain how Robeco's strategies have successfully capitalized on value and other factors such as quality, momentum, analyst revisions and novel next-gen factors.

Double discount

The current 'double discount' in emerging markets offers a golden investment opportunity, particularly as central banks in developed nations near the end of their monetary tightening cycles. Our multifaceted EM strategies not only aim for high risk-adjusted returns but also focus on sustainable investment dimensions, making these well-poised to leverage this unique market moment.

Read the full article here


Footnotes

1 We define value and the value spread as in Blitz, D. C., and Hanauer, M. X., January 2021, “Resurrecting the value premium”, Journal of Portfolio Management. More specifically, the value strategy is based on a composite of book-to-market (R&D adjusted), EBITDA/EV, CF/P, and NPY. Value stocks are sorted into quintile portfolios based on the valuation composite and in a region and sector respectively country neutral manner for developed and emerging markets. Quintile portfolios are equal-weighted and reformed monthly. The value spread is expressed as the ratio of a basket of valuation multiples of the top and bottom quintile value portfolios. We control for value spread differences that are normally observed between both portfolios, such that a value spread above one indicates cheapness. Since cheap stocks by definition have higher fundamental value to price ratios than their expensive peers, it is particularly important for the value factor to scale the value spread by its historical normal level.