A great expansion?
A long hurrah for the US expansion as steady she goes. This week the current US economic expansion, which started in June 2009, surpassed 120 months, thereby taking the first place from the 1991-2001 Clinton-era boom as longest post WWII period of economic growth without the US economy entering a recession. It has also been one of the most stable expansions with low volatility in economic growth, which has been beneficial for a strong rerating of risky assets. Trump claimed on Twitter this economy is ‘the best it has ever been’.
Really? Looking at the pace of this expansion there are reasons to be less cheerful. This expansion may be long and stable from a historical perspective (the average post WWII expansion lasted 58 months according to NBER institute, which dates business cycles), but it is by far the slowest. Since the end of the Great Recession, US real GDP grew a cumulative 24%, while the 1991-2001 expansion generated a cumulative growth of 41%, implying real GDP growth has run 1.7% below the Clinton-era boom on an annual basis.
The reason for this subdued growth path is the US consumer. The graph of the week shows US consumption expenditure paths (corrected for inflation) during NBER expansion phases post WWII. These paths reflect to some degree the overall subdued GDP growth, with US consumption lagging US consumption during the 1991-2001 boom by 2.1%.
Of course this begs the question, why has US consumption growth been so timid with respect to history in the past ten years? Isn’t US consumer confidence supposed to be at levels even higher than the peak levels observed during previous expansions (expect the 1991-2001)? Confident consumers should be more willing to spend.
Part of the answer resides in US household balance sheets. The Great Financial Crisis damaged US household balance sheets severely. US household debt outstanding as a percentage of net household disposable income peaked in 08Q1 at 133.6% and has consistently fallen to just 98.1% in 19Q1. The wake of the Great Financial Crisis has brought about a great deleveraging among US households, which has hampered consumption growth as people used income to pay off their debt instead.
However, this is not the complete story as the above line of reasoning applies only to the first years of the expansion. US net household debt bottomed in 12Q2 and from that point on has been steadily rising again. Why has this not triggered a boom in consumption growth? As the NY Fed recently noted, debt growth since the GFC has been concentrated among older, higher credit score and presumably wealthier households. These are also typical households with a lower marginal propensity to spend their available cash.
Lastly, consumption growth could have been restrained by higher risk aversion as the memory of the crisis remained alive, and gloom is extrapolated into the future. Literature shows that if income drops threaten habitual spending patterns, households become very risk averse and attach more value to every additional dollar of income. This risk aversion explanation corroborates with the doubling of the US household saving rate since 2007. Thus, the appearance of a ‘steady she goes expansion’ reveals significant changes in consumption behavior.
The content displayed on this website is exclusively directed at qualified investors, as defined in the swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 june 2006 ("cisa") and its implementing ordinance, or at “independent asset managers” which meet additional requirements as set out below. Qualified investors are in particular regulated financial intermediaries such as banks, securities dealers, fund management companies and asset managers of collective investment schemes and central banks, regulated insurance companies, public entities and retirement benefits institutions with professional treasury or companies with professional treasury.
The contents, however, are not intended for non-qualified investors. By clicking "I agree" below, you confirm and acknowledge that you act in your capacity as qualified investor pursuant to CISA or as an “independent asset manager” who meets the additional requirements set out hereafter. In the event that you are an "independent asset manager" who meets all the requirements set out in Art. 3 para. 2 let. c) CISA in conjunction with Art. 3 CISO, by clicking "I Agree" below you confirm that you will use the content of this website only for those of your clients which are qualified investors pursuant to CISA.
Representative in Switzerland of the foreign funds registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") for distribution in or from Switzerland to non-qualified investors is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, and the paying agent is UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich. Please consult www.finma.ch for a list of FINMA registered funds.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco/RobecoSAM AG product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, articles of association, prospectuses, key investor information documents and annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website, at the registered seat of the representative in Switzerland, as well as at the Robeco/RobecoSAM AG offices in each country where Robeco has a presence. In respect of the funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the representative in Switzerland.
This website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, the publication or availability of this website is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this website.