Executive Director, Head of Wholesale Netherlands
Active Quant: finding alpha with confidence
Blending data-driven insights, risk control and quant expertise to pursue reliable returns.
• 訪談
Customizing quant with Quintet
In an investment world increasingly focused on sustainability, investors face the complex task of aligning their portfolios with sustainable practices and evolving regulations. Each investor’s journey is distinct, often presenting challenges in identifying an appropriate starting point or pathway. In response, Robeco leverages its sustainable investing IP and strong quantitative research capabilities to meet clients at the current stage in their sustainability journey. A prime example of this approach is our collaboration with Quintet, aimed at increasing the level of sustainability while maintaining a robust client portfolio.
In our discussion with Paul Linssen, Head of Fund Solutions at Quintet and Robin van der Poel, Robeco’s Deputy Head of Sales, we explored Quintet’s desire to enhance sustainability without trading in returns. This conversation shed light on the journey for a bespoke solution and how Robeco, using our Customizer tool, effectively met Quintet’s specific needs.
作者
Robin van der Poel
Anna Heldring
Investment writer
Investment Specialist
What unique challenges was Quintet looking to address at the start of this journey?
Paul Linssen: “This first came up around Covid, when we started discussing developments within Quintet. I indicated to Robin that we were trying to make our portfolio more robust, while maintaining the sustainable profile. We had discovered that the instruments we used had a relatively high correlation. So we were looking for something that would diversify compared to the methodology we already had in place, in this case the MSCI World SRI index. And we preferred an instrument that ideally had a lower tracking error compared to the parent benchmark, because we measure performance against traditional benchmarks. So those were the two main challenges we faced, and that’s when the conversation kicked off.”
What aspects of collaborating with Robeco to develop a customized solution were the most significant for you? What elements were you especially drawn to?
Paul: “The starting point for us is to feel comfortable with the skills and in-house expertise. Having an established relationship with Robeco, we knew that your quant side was strong. We’ve used several of your solutions over the years, so when we asked for a lower tracking error portfolio, we were confident we’d get a robust one. Your strong track record in sustainability combined with the quant elements, especially around in the light of SFDR discussions, was another compelling argument in favor of Robeco in supporting such products.
Practicalities also play a big role, like the flexibility to create share classes across Quintet’s locations. We’ve got a lot of different locations with diverse needs, and the more flexible your partner, the easier it is to gain acceptance across different countries. This flexibility from your end has been a significant advantage.
The comparative discussions regarding your proposed solution and the indices, and the evaluation of added value and overall portfolio effect was also helpful. And the work around the SDGs was especially appealing to the sustainability team because it was a different setup and one that we could easily follow in terms of how to build the portfolio.”
The dedicated marketing support during the launch was crucial, too. Given that quantitative strategies differ from fundamental ones, detailing what the product entails is important. Your support was excellent, adding to its widespread acceptance. One last thing to mention is the softer but equally important values: our open dialogue, mutual trust, responsiveness, reliability, and a long-term focus.
Find out more
Robin, could you please take us through the journey so far from your perspective? In terms of your collaboration with Paul and Quintet and the process behind the scenes?
Robin van der Poel: “As a client, Paul didn’t witness our extensive behind-the-scenes work. Mutual trust, as Paul said, is essential, and our personal relationship played a role in co-creating this solution. I appreciated the openness from both sides, and for our part we opened up our quant research. Jan de Koning, our Head of Quant Client Portfolio Management closely collaborating with the client. The request was complex, involving balancing the risks of the SRI indices with a product offering similar sustainability but lower tracking error. We said yes, we can do that, but then had to backtest and show how it worked.
Initially, there was significant exploration into the structure and the right level of tracking error to reduce the overall tracking error in Quintet’s US portfolio. Our collaboration with Paul and team was marked by frequent discussions to refine the product to meet their specific needs. For example, in our SDG discussions, we debated whether to exclude only the -2 and -3 scoring companies, or also the -1s in terms of the SFDR.
The process, lasting about six to eight weeks, was dynamic. Our quant team’s flexibility was highly appreciated. We constantly made adjustments, potentially laying the groundwork for the Quant Customizer we now use. This tool enables real-time discussions with clients to adjust tracking error or sustainability characteristics. At that time, however, it was still a concept and not integrated into the tool.
In terms of marketing support, Jan and I in particular held four webinars for the investment teams across Europe. This also supported the perception of the products within Quintet. With the SRI indices lagging behind the regular ones, there were question marks around sustainability. Robeco promised and delivered US exposure with a lower tracking error and a high level of sustainability and even outperformed the benchmark. It’s a good example of the quant team translating client desires into a solution they want.”
獲取最新市場觀點
訂閱我們的電子報，時刻把握投資資訊和專家分析。
Can you elaborate more on the solutions we’re developing with clients in general?
Robin: “We see a lot of interest in customizing portfolios based on client preferences, which are pretty nuanced, maybe on a regional basis or in terms of the desired outcomes. This is where we can use our customizer tool to assess what sustainability considerations they want to take into account, if they have specific return targets, and what flexibility they have in terms of risk budgets. So if it doesn't fit cleanly into a pooled vehicle, we can customize the solution for them on a mandate basis. That's where we are seeing activity. Given that we use a quant platform capable of trading off sustainability, risk, and returns, that flexibility is quite appealing to clients.
And we increasingly see clients coming to us with the passive question, wanting a higher level of sustainability because standard indices are not that flexible, and often not that sustainable. Or, if they are, they come with an elevated tracking error, echoing Quintet’s experience with the SRI indices. In this example, when a choice is made to overweight US assets while using the SRI index, you often see underperformance due to its strict exclusions and constraints. This means if you’re bullish on the US and expect high returns, going the SI route might lead to lower returns than expected. It’s a significant shift from what you’d normally anticipate, and it can be tricky to explain why there’s a drop in performance. This is hugely mitigated with this solution because we tick a lot of boxes. By combining everything in one algorithm, we deviate much less.”
Paul: “Another factor is that we have a pan-European footprint. We noticed that the leeway people accept in terms of underperformance linked to sustainability, for example in 2022, was higher in the Netherlands than perhaps some other countries. This customized solution really caters to both sides of that debate, striking the right balance.”
重要資料
本網站僅供《證券及期貨條例》（香港法例第571章）及其附屬法例所界定之專業投資者瀏覽及使用。 投資涉及風險。過往表現並不代表未來表現。本網站所載資料僅供參考之用，並不構成任何投資建議，亦非作出買賣任何證券或採納任何投資策略之要約或招攬。投資者不應僅憑本網站提供之資料作出投資決定，在作出任何投資決定前，應徵詢獨立意見（包括有關稅務影響之意見）。投資者應確保完全理解投資產品的相關風險，亦應考量自身投資目標及風險承受水平。投資乃閣下之個人決定。除非銷售投資產品的中介人已向閣下告知該投資產品適合閣下，並已解釋其符合閣下投資目標之原因，否則閣下不應投資。請參閱相關發售文件或其他法律文件，以獲取包括風險因素在內的進一步詳情。 本網站由荷寶投資管理香港有限公司發布，該公司受香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會（「證監會」）規管（中央編號：APU851）。本網站未經證監會審閱。 無法保證任何投資產品可實現其投資目標。概不就任何投資產品之表現或投資回報作任何聲明或承諾。投資的價值或會波動。本網站所載過往表現、推算或預測，均不應視作未來表現之保證或指標，且概不提供任何明示或暗示之保證。本網站內容建基於相信為可靠之來源，惟因應資料傳遞技術特性及須採用多項數據來源（包括第三方內容），故概不保證其準確性。所述觀點僅乃截至上述日期，或會隨市況變化而改變，可予更改而毋須另行通知。該等意見可能有別於其他荷寶投資專業人士之意見。因使用本材料或當中所載任何評論、意見或估算而引致之直接、間接或相應損失，荷寶概不承擔法律責任。荷寶並無責任更新本網站或任何網站內容。未經荷寶事先書面許可，不得複製、分發或刊發本網站任何材料。 除非另有說明，資料來源:荷寶。
