Lower liquidity, collective responsibility

Lower liquidity, collective responsibility

28-07-2016 | インサイト

The financial industry needs to collectively deal with lower liquidity in bond markets, says Robeco’s head of risk analysis.

  • Robbert  Vonk
    Robbert
    Vonk
    Head of Risk Analysis

Speed read

  • Structural changes have made it harder to quickly trade bonds
  • An industry-wide solution is needed on top of internal risk controls
  • Taking a long-term investment perspective is essential

Structural changes in the market are making it more difficult to quickly trade bonds, particularly under stressed conditions, Robbert Vonk warns. Robeco has taken internal measures to protect clients and is also working with regulators and other asset managers to discuss industry-wide solutions. In addition, clients are advised to have a long-term investment perspective and to act counter-cyclically.

クレジットに関する最新の「インサイト」を読む
クレジットに関する最新の「インサイト」を読む
配信登録

The liquidity issue

Liquidity in the fixed income markets globally has been negatively affected since the financial crisis of 2008. Before the Lehman collapse, banks could hold substantial amounts of bonds purely for trading purposes, and their balance sheets functioned as a buffer. Following the crisis, regulation enshrined in Basel III forced banks to abandon this function in order to reduce risk. At the same time, mutual funds grew in size, following increased client interest for higher yielding assets. The lack of a buffer and more concentrated holdings in mutual funds created substantial volatility, leading to bigger shocks in markets potentially exacerbating client reactions (for instance selling in bear markets).

A second problem has been created by the introduction of quantitative easing in 2008, in which central banks created new money and purchased government bonds with it. Eight years later, some central banks own up to one-third of their domestic bond markets, taking these securities offline. The European Central Bank is now also buying non-bank corporate bonds, which may make the situation worse.

Meanwhile, after persistently falling interest rates, many investors think that bond yields cannot fall any further. If yields start to rise then prices will start to fall, potentially starting a stampede to sell them. And if everyone tries to sell at once, the market faces a massive problem, Vonk says. “It is in the industry’s and clients’ interest to come up with measures to avoid a disaster scenario like massive fund closures in certain asset classes”.

Daily liquidity’s pros and cons

The problem is exacerbated because most asset managers allow clients the freedom to trade into funds on a daily basis. This gives investors the confidence that they can always get their money back – or quickly top up investments should they wish. But it leaves asset managers vulnerable to a sudden exodus if a market turns unexpectedly, as we have recently seen with the closure of several UK real estate funds following the Brexit vote.

“The client perception of liquidity can be even more misled by the wide offering of exchange traded funds, which can be traded on an intraday basis, investing in markets which are essentially illiquid,” says Vonk. “This can draw the wrong type of client to certain asset classes.”

What Robeco is doing

Robeco has its own measures to ensure the stability of its extensive range of funds. “There are several safeguards: firstly, through proper risk measurement and secondly, through risk mitigation,” Vonk assures investors.

“Robeco has a comprehensive liquidity risk framework incorporating the dynamic that exists between liquidity risks related to assets on the one hand and funding on the other. Asset liquidity risk arises when transactions cannot be conducted at quoted market prices due to the size of the required trade, or, worse, when they cannot be conducted at all.”

“This type of risk tends to be compounded by other risks: when markets are falling or are very volatile, or when the creditworthiness of counterparties deteriorates; at these times, liquidity tends to dry up. Funding liquidity risk relates to the ability to redeem fund clients without significantly impacting the value of the portfolio. This kind of risk will only arise if there is limited asset liquidity, so the latter is dependent on the former.”

Robeco’s risk policy focusses on verifying whether the current portfolio is liquid enough to meet substantial future redemptions, Vonk adds. “If not, the portfolio will explicitly be discussed in the Risk Management Committee and measures will be taken.”

‘We have strict rules to make sure we have sufficient cash buffers’

“Additionally, exposure to illiquid instruments is restricted at portfolio level. And Robeco maintains a detailed contingency plan which outlines the course of action in the event of severe liquidity crises, either as a consequence of severe cash outflows or unusual market distress.”

“We also have strict rules to make sure we have sufficient cash buffers. For instance, the Robeco High Yield Bonds fund holds a minimum of 5% of the fund in cash equivalents. In more stressed situations this can go up to 7-10% of the fund held in cash.” Robeco has also ensured that the funds have the ability to temporarily run a deficit.

Among the more technical measures, swing pricing is applied to all Luxembourg-domiciled funds to protect the interests of long-term shareholders from the impact of transaction costs resulting from subscription and redemption activities by other shareholders.

Collective response

That said, the industry still needs more structural measures for some asset classes, says Vonk. “We strongly believe that the industry can benefit from a further harmonization over different jurisdictions with respect to the risk management tools available to fund managers,” he says.

“This includes tools such as notice periods, and the availability of anti-dilution practices, like swing pricing, which will ultimately benefit the fund’s investors. Moreover, in order to reduce the likelihood of material mismatches in offered versus available liquidity, authorities should have a clear stance on what trading frequencies are considered acceptable for certain asset classes.”

“This needs coordination though. Nobody is willing, for example, to unilaterally move away from daily liquidity to say, 10-day liquidity or monthly liquidity. If your neighbor isn’t doing it, and you start doing it, you can be sure that everyone will exit the fund.”

Robeco is actively collaborating with regulators and other interest groups to consider implementing a cross-industry response. The firm is also working closely with industry associations such as the International Capital Markets Association (ICMA), contributing to a paper entitled ‘Managing fund liquidity risk in Europe’ that was presented to the European Fund and Asset Management Association for discussion in April 2016.

‘Slowly we have been turning towards the same vision’

“We have frequent discussions on this with our fellow asset managers,” says Vonk. “Slowly we have been turning towards the same vision that something needs to be done. And we don’t want regulation to be counter-productive in that by mitigating a certain risk it creates a new one. So we need good interaction with the regulators so we can have a discussion on the proper way of dealing with it.”

He says a sign that the industry is moving in the right direction is the recent consultation paper by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) entitled ‘Proposed Policy Recommendations to Address Structural Vulnerabilities from Asset Management Activities’. “This paper outlines very sensible proposals to harmonize and make the industry and markets more resilient to this low liquidity environment,” says Vonk.

Long-term perspective and acting contrarian

Investors can also help by adopting a long-term approach to investing and not panicking during market shocks such as the recent Brexit crisis, Vonk concludes. When the UK voted to leave the EU in a referendum on 23 June, corporate bond yields rose substantially. In this case, rather than everyone trying to sell at the same time, they all tried to buy at the same time. Bond yields later stabilized once the dust had settled.

“We advise clients to have a long-term perspective when investing in certain asset classes and, in line with Robeco’s own investment philosophy, we advise people to invest in a counter-cyclical manner, so to stay ahead of the curve.”

重要事項

当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。

ご契約に際しては、必要に応じ専門家にご相談の上、最終的なご判断はお客様ご自身でなさるようお願い致します。

運用を行う資産の評価額は、組入有価証券等の価格、金融市場の相場や金利等の変動、及び組入有価証券の発行体の財務状況による信用力等の影響を受けて変動します。また、外貨建資産に投資する場合は為替変動の影響も受けます。運用によって生じた損益は、全て投資家の皆様に帰属します。したがって投資元本や一定の運用成果が保証されているものではなく、投資元本を上回る損失を被ることがあります。弊社が行う金融商品取引業に係る手数料または報酬は、締結される契約の種類や契約資産額により異なるため、当資料において記載せず別途ご提示させて頂く場合があります。具体的な手数料または報酬の金額・計算方法につきましては弊社担当者へお問合せください。

当資料及び記載されている情報、商品に関する権利は弊社に帰属します。したがって、弊社の書面による同意なくしてその全部もしくは一部を複製またはその他の方法で配布することはご遠慮ください。

商号等: ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社  金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長(金商)第2780号

加入協会: 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会