Three investors’ perspectives on Brexit

Three investors’ perspectives on Brexit

16-06-2016 | インサイト

On June 23, 2016, the British will vote whether or not they want to remain a member of the European Union. In this article, three investors – Lukas Daalder, Mark Glazener and Kommer van Trigt - give their take on the consequences of a potential Brexit for, respectively, the main asset classes, global equities, and global bonds.

  • Kommer van Trigt
    van Trigt
    Portfolio manager, Head of Global Fixed Income Macro
  • Lukas Daalder
    Chief Investment Officer
  • Léon  Cornelissen
    Chief Economist

Speed read

  • Asset allocation: flight to safety
  • Equities: overweight UK stocks, country risk hedged
  • Bonds: cautious on UK and peripheral government bonds

Asset allocation: a flight to safety

The latest polls (50/50) and bookmaker quotes (75/25 in favor of staying in the EU) clearly show that a Brexit outcome is far from certain. This means that markets certainly have not discounted the full impact yet. A Brexit outcome will therefore be seen as a negative surprise, which should trigger a flight to safety. This is generally considered as bad for stocks and positive for bonds. If Brexit were to materialize – which we do not deem likely - we expect the FTSE 100 index to plummet with, to a lesser extent, the Euro Stoxx 50 in its wake. On other equity markets trading will be volatile, but there we expect losses to remain limited.


Global equities: hedging Brexit risk

As the Global Equity team finds an above average amount of attractive stocks in the UK market, the global equity portfolio is overweight the UK. Holdings include British American Tobacco, Compass, Experian, Reckitt Benckiser, Rio Tinto and Vodafone. Besides that, the global equity strategy is invested in Hong Kong-listed HBSC and Royal Dutch Shell, which has a Dutch and UK listing.

The common denominator of these stocks is that the largest part of their revenues comes from overseas. In the event of a Brexit, which should have a dampening effect on British GBP, these companies will benefit, as they won’t be harmed by sterling weakness and have little exposure to the UK economy.

Despite the overweight resulting from stock selection, we have hedged the country exposure to the UK back to benchmark weight with FTSE 100 futures, in view of the Brexit risk. The position in pound sterling is also neutral versus the benchmark.

Furthermore, we are staying clear of real estate companies and banks, which have a large exposure to the UK economy and would suffer from weak sterling. Financial companies are also most likely to be impacted because they are major exporters of services. While the WTO sets international trade standards for goods, there are no such rules for services. This means that the UK will have to rearrange its trading relationships with the whole world anew.

Global fixed income: comfortable with UK banks

In the Global Fixed Income team, we also think that a win for the leave vote would be the surprise outcome and would therefore have the biggest market impact. Although sterling would be hit hard, we do not believe the Bank of England will tighten monetary policy to support the currency and dampen imported inflation. The Bank of England has shown before that it is willing to look through these temporary and transitory effects. Furthermore a weakening of the British pound – as long as it takes place orderly - might even be welcome to offset some of the negative economic consequences. A dovish stance is more likely, but probably the central bank will want to take some time to assess the situation before setting a new course.

In the case of a Brexit vote win, we do not expect severe funding problems for UK banks. However, would they arise, other central banks such as the Fed and the European Central Bank would immediately help out with swap arrangements to provide the necessary US dollars and euros. The potential impact on UK Gilts is more uncertain. With a budget deficit already more than 4% and a current account deficit running at 7%, long dated Gilts could face selling pressure from international investors.

Our base case scenario as of today is a win for the Bremain camp. Our holdings in UK government bonds are small. Within our corporate bond holdings a sizeable part consists of financial institutions. Amongst them are UK banks such as Barclays and Lloyds. At the start of the year these bonds underperformed other segments of the credit market in anticipation of a possible Brexit outcome. In relative terms, the fundamentals of UK banks are positive. Until now they recovered fastest in cleaning up their balance sheets. We expect these bonds to do well in case the stay vote would win. If the opposite occurs, some spread widening is to be expected, but current spreads have to some degree already factored in a negative outcome.

European politicians of the mainstream parties are terrified that a win for the Brexit camp will fuel Euroscepticism and support anti-EU parties throughout the continent. Which country will be next? Most likely the Euro system will be tested by investors and peripheral markets will come under pressure. As the ECB is already active in the market, we do not expect a replay of the 2011/2012 sovereign crisis, but we do sense that peripheral markets are too complacent. Political risk throughout the region is on the rise, debt dynamics remain worrisome to say the least and appetite for economic reforms is absent. In our fixed income portfolios we have scaled down exposure to these markets significantly.


当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。




商号等: ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社  金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長(金商)第2780号

加入協会: 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会