frankrijkfr
Deactivating and reactivating active share

Deactivating and reactivating active share

08-02-2017 | From the field

A 2015 study challenged the usefulness of active share. The authors found that funds with a high active share typically have small-cap benchmarks, while low active share funds tend to have large-cap benchmarks. The intuition is that if a large-cap fund takes a position in a stock such as Apple, it immediately introduces a significant amount of overlap with its benchmark, in which Apple also has a large weight.

  • David Blitz
    David
    Blitz
    Head of Quant Research

A 2015 study by AQR researchers* challenged the usefulness of active share. The authors found that funds with a high active share typically have small-cap benchmarks, while low active share funds tend to have large-cap benchmarks. The intuition is that if a large-cap fund takes a position in a stock such as Apple, it immediately introduces a significant amount of overlap with its benchmark, in which Apple also has a large weight.

The authors argued that sorting funds according to active share is equivalent to sorting according to benchmark type, and that the question should be whether active share is effective for funds that share a given benchmark type. Empirically, they found no reliable statistical evidence that high active share funds outperform low active share funds after controlling for benchmark type.

A few months later, Cremers** and Petajisto*** wrote separate responses to AQR’s criticism of their active share measure. They both acknowledged that active share works for half the benchmark types but not for the other half. However, they pointed out that not every benchmark type contains the same number of funds, and that the benchmark types for which active share is effective contain the vast majority of funds.

Cremers even took a critical look at AQR’s retail funds, noting that they have a relatively low active share and a rather unimpressive performance track record, wondering if that might explain their dislike of the active share measure. All in all, it seems that the debate about active share is likely to continue.

*Frazzini, Friedman & Pomorski, “Deactivating Active Share”, working paper.
**Cremers, “AQR in Wonderland”, working paper
***Petajisto, “Response to AQR’s Article Titled ‘Deactivating Active Share’, working paper

Restez informé sur l'investissement quantitatif
Restez informé sur l'investissement quantitatif
Inscrivez-vous
From the field
From the field

Nos analystes publient de nombreuses études basées sur leurs propres recherches empiriques ; ils suivent aussi de près les recherches quantitatives réalisées par leurs collègues. Le responsable du département Quant Equities Research David Blitz se penche sur des études indépendantes réputées.

Lisez tous les articles
Les sujets en rapport avec cet article sont :

Information importante

L’information publiée dans les pages de ce site internet est plus particulièrement destinée aux investisseurs professionnels.

Certains fonds mentionnés dans le site peuvent ne pas être autorisés à la commercialisation en France par l’Autorité des Marchés Financiers. Les informations ou opinions exprimées dans les pages de ce site internet ne représentent pas une sollicitation, une offre ou une recommandation à l’achat ou à la vente de titres ou produits financiers. Elles n’ont pas pour objectif d’inciter à des transactions ou de fournir des conseils ou service en investissement. Avant tout investissement dans un produit Robeco, il est nécessaire d’avoir lu au préalable les documents légaux tels que le document d’information clé pour l’investisseur (DICI), le prospectus complet, les rapports annuels et semi-annuels, qui sont disponibles sur ce site internet ou qui peuvent être obtenus gratuitement, sur simple demande auprès de Robeco France.

Nous vous remercions de confirmer que vous êtes un investisseur professionnel et que vous avez lu, compris et accepté les conditions d’utilisation de ce site internet.

Je n’accepte pas