Investing in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be challenging, but it is now possible to verify corporate contributions to them.
A three-step framework developed jointly by Robeco and RobecoSAM offers a scoring methodology that evaluates a specific company’s ability to meet the 17 SDGs, or whether its products or activities detract from them. The framework enables the construction of a bespoke credits strategy that can be shown to make a positive contribution.
The SDGs range from eradicating world hunger and reducing global warming, to improving health care, technological access and educational standards in emerging markets. Launched in 2015, they have been adopted by 193 countries, with a challenge to businesses – including asset managers – around the world to help meet them all by 2030.
“We’ve created a three-step process to assess the impact that companies are having on achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Jan Willem de Moor, manager of the RobecoSAM Global SDG Credits fund, told the Responsible Investor 2018 conference.
“In the first step we look at what the companies are producing, or what services they are offering, and how does that contribute to a specific SDG. For example, for SDG3 (good health and well-being), it would make sense to look at pharmaceutical companies, or those making medical devices, or offering health care insurance, as these companies could contribute to that specific SDG.”
“Taking SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities), we would focus on home builders, the producers of building materials, and also car producers, because if you’re making a lot of electric vehicles, this is helping to achieve the goal of sustainable cities.”
“SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) is a typical example of where it’s difficult to find companies whose products contribute directly to this SDG. This is where the second step of the process is used to focus on how companies are producing their goods. Are they, for instance, emphasizing gender equality in their human resources, creating a good governance structure, or putting a lot of emphasis on reducing their greenhouse gas emissions?”
“Lastly in step 3, we focus on controversies. The first two steps are more process orientated, while in the third step we look at whether a company has done something like generated an oil spill for example, has been caught up in bribery and fraudulent activity, or has been mis-selling its products. We then assess whether this was a one-off event, and whether the company is addressing its problems or not.”
The outcome of this three-step process is quantified in the SDG rating framework. This uses a proprietary scoring system developed by RobecoSAM in which scores are assigned from +3 for those companies making the best contributions, to -3 for those making the worst. Detractors would include companies suspected of using child labor, causing excessive pollution, or selling over-priced products for quick profits in emerging markets, and such activity would be reflected in negative scores.
“We find that about 60% of companies in our investment universe do make a positive contribution to the SDGs,” de Moor says. “We use these outcomes as a screening process and a first step into creating a credit portfolio that would ultimately have a positive impact on the SDGs.”
“This is really new, and is different to the way we used to do things. Our dedicated sustainability products always used to have a best in class approach – which is something we still offer – but the SDGs have more of a sector focus. It’s been driven by client demand for more impact-created products, as clients don’t want to invest in certain companies.”
The information contained on these pages is for marketing purposes and solely intended for Qualified Investors in accordance with the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006 (“CISA”) domiciled in Switzerland, Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients.
The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent. The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website www.robeco.ch. Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 26 June 2006 (“CISA”) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).
Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the RobecoSwitzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports.