‘Facts’ about formulaic value investing

‘Facts’ about formulaic value investing

01-11-2017 | From the field
Successful value investing requires well designed strategies. This paper 1 argues that simple, formula-based value strategies do not deliver superior investment performance for US equities, and that “a capable analyst should be able to significantly enhance” such approaches.
  • David Blitz
    David
    Blitz
    Hoofd afdeling Quantitative Research

However, the evidence presented in support of the first claim is not very convincing, as it is solely based on the classic book-to-market value strategy of Fama-French, while ignoring many related value strategies, based on earnings, cash-flows or dividends, for instance.

Book-to-market is known to be one of the weakest value strategies. It also tends to work strongly against other well-known factors, such as momentum, because it tends to buy stocks that have gone down considerably, as well as low-volatility, because it tends to buy financially distressed firms. Based on our research, value strategies which look at multiple valuation factors and which prevent negative exposures to other factors yield strong and robust results. Perhaps that makes us the “capable analysts” that the authors refer to in their study.

1Kok, Ribando & Sloan, “Facts about Formulaic Value Investing”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2017, pp. 81-99.

Blijf op de hoogte van kwantitatieve inzichten
Blijf op de hoogte van kwantitatieve inzichten
Aanmelden
From the field
From the field

Onze onderzoekers publiceren veel whitepapers die zijn gebaseerd op hun eigen empirische onderzoek, maar ze kijken ook naar kwantitatief onderzoek dat door anderen is gedaan. David Blitz, hoofd Quant Equities Research, vertelt over opvallende externe papers.

Lees alle artikelen