In this paper Eugene Fama and Kenneth French look at the importance of volatility over longer investment horizons.
They begin by noting that historically there has been a sizable equity risk premium, and also sizable premiums of small and value stocks over the market. They go on to show that as the return horizon increases, the probability of obtaining a positive market, size or value premium increases as well.
However, the bad news is that even if future expected premiums match high past averages, the probabilities of negative realized premiums are still substantial at commonly used investment horizons of three to five years. Even for 10- and 20-year periods these probabilities are found to remain nontrivial.
Our take-away from this paper1 is that even if a factor premium is negative over the next twenty years, this cannot be taken as conclusive evidence that the factor premium is gone. In other words, it is basically impossible to prove that a factor premium has disappeared. This probably feels uncomfortable to many investors, but such is the nature of statistics.
1Fama & French, “Volatility Lessons”, SSRN working paper, no. 3081101, 2017.
Nuestros investigadores publican multitud de informes basados en sus propios estudios empíricos; también siguen los análisis cuantitativos que hacen los demás. Comentarios de nuestro responsable de análisis cuantitativo para renta variable, David Blitz, sobre publicaciones externas de gran relevancia.