Disclaimer

The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).

The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.

By clicking Proceed I confirm that I am a professional investor and/or institutional investor and that I have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

Decline
Getting the most out of low-vol investing

Getting the most out of low-vol investing

27-08-2012 | Insight

Do you know why it makes sense to invest in an enhanced low-volatility strategy rather than a generic alternative?

  • Pim  van Vliet
    Pim
    van Vliet
    Managing Director Conservative Equities - Pim van Vliet

That is just one question answered by Pim van Vliet, Senior Portfolio Manager of Robeco Conservative Equities, in a new FAQ on low-volatility investing.

So why does opting for an enhanced low-volatility strategy make sense? As Van Vliet explains, it is because an enhanced strategy, such as Robeco Conservative Equity, can overcome some serious pitfalls associated with low-volatility investing.

“Generic low-volatility strategies, which may be based on a single backward-looking statistical risk measure, such as volatility or beta, are exposed to unnecessary downside risk, high turnover in illiquid stocks and concentration risks,” he explains.

By contrast, the Robeco Conservative Equity strategy captures the low-volatility premium more efficiently by reducing risk and enhancing return. Risk is reduced by using a combination of statistical risk variables and by including forward-looking risk measures based on a proprietary distress-risk model. Meanwhile, returns are enhanced by selecting low-volatility stocks which also have attractive valuation and sentiment characteristics.

“Not every low-volatility stock is created equal: some are destined to perform better than others,” observes Van Vliet. “We improve risk-adjusted returns by selecting low-volatile stocks that also have attractive return potential.” Chart 1 shows the difference between Robeco Conservative Equity and a generic low-volatility strategy.

‘Generic low-volatility strategies are exposed to unnecessary downside risk, high turnover in illiquid stocks and concentration risks’

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Chart 1: Risk & return characteristics of Conservative Equity vs generic low-volatility strategy

Source: Robeco