17-11-2021 · Insight

Reflections on the COP26 Climate Summit

COP26 provided a breakthrough on the rulebook of the Paris Agreement. Although progress on the more ambitious policies for 2030 was good, this is still insufficient to get the world on a trajectory of below 2 degrees.

    Authors

  • Lucian Peppelenbos - Climate & Biodiversity Strategist

    Lucian Peppelenbos

    Climate & Biodiversity Strategist

  • Kenneth Robertson - Client Portfolio Manager - Sustainable Investing

    Kenneth Robertson

    Client Portfolio Manager - Sustainable Investing

The COP26, the UN Climate Summit held in Glasgow, has ended. COP is the annual Conference of Parties that are signed up to the UN Climate Accord, also known as the Paris Agreement. Glasgow was the 26th time that the COP was organized, featuring two weeks of negotiations between 20,000 official delegates, and discussions and workshops amongst 20,000 non-state delegates. What are COP26’s key outcomes and how are these relevant to investors?

Key outcome, in short

COP26 provided a breakthrough on the rulebook of the Paris Agreement, and good progress on more ambitious policies for 2030. Nevertheless, these are insufficient at this stage to get the world on a trajectory of below 2 degrees.

Check out our summary in the final video of our ‘Good COP, bad COP' series: COP26: The verdict on the COP26 summit.

A rulebook for getting to Paris

After six years of negotiation, governments agreed on the rulebook for implementing the Paris Agreement. This was arguably the biggest surprise of the summit, given the disappointing progress made in the first week. The US-China climate deal (‘US-China Joint Glasgow Declaration on Enhancing Climate Action in the 2020s’), clinched towards the end of the summit, may have helped to streamline these negotiations in the final hours.

The rulebook covers critical topics like the reporting of emissions, the monitoring of policies and, most importantly, the trading of emission rights through carbon markets. This agreement allows the focus to shift from negotiation to implementation. It will facilitate international cooperation and cross-border investments into emission reduction. More serious carbon markets may emerge, which in turn could support investments in forests and other natural carbon sinks.

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates

Receive our Robeco newsletter and be the first to read the latest insights and build the greenest portfolio.

Read more

A plethora of policy pledges

A number of new policy pledges for 2030 were made, including reducing methane emissions, halting deforestation, phasing out coal power, and stopping public financing of fossil fuel abroad. Though some of these pledges are vaguely framed and not signed by the major emitters, they still have good potential to reduce emissions before 2030. Moreover, the US-China climate deal complements these pledges as the world's two largest emitters commit to collaborate and take urgent action in this decade. Overall, the temperature score for policy pledges up to 2030 is now between 2.4 and 2.7 degrees. Taking 2050 pledges into account, the score is between 1.8 and 2.1 degrees.

Significantly, nearly 90% of global emissions is now under a net zero commitment.

Extraordinary private sector involvement

There was unprecedented private sector participation. Hundreds of corporates and investors committed to net zero in the run-up to COP26, and several ‘real-world deals’ were announced to accelerate low-carbon transport, building, industry, etc. Among banks, asset owners, asset managers and insurance companies, there is now USD 130 trillion committed to net zero, though that figure was rightfully criticized for including double-counting.

Robeco is among the 43 asset managers that announced concrete short-term targets and actions for achieving net zero; 180 peers will follow in the course of next year.

A just transition for emerging markets

Industrialized countries were under strong pressure from developing countries to live up to their promises of providing climate finance (USD 100 billion per year) and supporting adaptation and a just transition. Though industrialized countries reinforced their commitment, the actual delivery will likely remain a thorny issue and may undermine progress in other areas. A positive example of progress in this area was provided by the USD 8.5 billion deal through which US, EU and UK will support Eskom, the South African state-owned power utility, to accelerate the transition of its coal-power fleet.