The content displayed on this website is exclusively directed at qualified investors, as defined in the swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 june 2006 ("cisa") and its implementing ordinance, or at “independent asset managers” which meet additional requirements as set out below. Qualified investors are in particular regulated financial intermediaries such as banks, securities dealers, fund management companies and asset managers of collective investment schemes and central banks, regulated insurance companies, public entities and retirement benefits institutions with professional treasury or companies with professional treasury.
The contents, however, are not intended for non-qualified investors. By clicking "I agree" below, you confirm and acknowledge that you act in your capacity as qualified investor pursuant to CISA or as an “independent asset manager” who meets the additional requirements set out hereafter. In the event that you are an "independent asset manager" who meets all the requirements set out in Art. 3 para. 2 let. c) CISA in conjunction with Art. 3 CISO, by clicking "I Agree" below you confirm that you will use the content of this website only for those of your clients which are qualified investors pursuant to CISA.
Representative in Switzerland of the foreign funds registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") for distribution in or from Switzerland to non-qualified investors is Robeco Switzerland AG, Josefstrasse 218, 8005 Zürich, and the paying agent is UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich. Please consult www.finma.ch for a list of FINMA registered funds.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco/Robeco Switzerland product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, articles of association, prospectuses, key investor information documents and annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website, at the registered seat of the representative in Switzerland, as well as at the Robeco/Robeco Switzerland offices in each country where Robeco has a presence. In respect of the funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the representative in Switzerland.
This website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, the publication or availability of this website is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this website.
The annual predictions season officially kicked off the moment we tore the last page off our 2015 calendar. Anything from simply making future projections based on existing movements and trends to coming up with top-of-your-head ideas for ‘black swans’ – unexpected events that could have a major impact.
We gave Lukas Daalder, CIO Investment Solutions, thirteen potential scenarios and asked him how likely they are to occur. And, if they do, what their impact will be on the financial markets.
“Of all the variables that play a role on the financial markets, volatility is strictly speaking the most difficult to predict. Its main characteristic is that it always picks up when you are not expecting it to. In the current scenario, there are a number of reasons why the high volatility of 2015 is likely to continue. Firstly, the divergence in the monetary policy of the major central banks (the Federal Reserve is tightening; the ECB and Bank of Japan are easing). There is also a lot of uncertainty about oil: is the low oil price purely a supply issue or are there also demand-related reasons? And then there’s the falling ISM Index in the US which has now dropped to below 50. That’s also a cause for concern. Of course, volatility doesn’t necessarily have to be negative. In volatile markets prices still generally move higher, and that is our base scenario for 2016.
‘Historically nine out of ten geopolitical conflicts are non-events from an investor’s perspective’
“This really is a serious conflict. But investors often overreact to geopolitical tensions. A year ago we had a conflict between Russia and Ukraine; it didn’t lead to a new world war. The tensions between Russia and Turkey haven’t escalated either. Historically the best strategy for investors is to ignore geopolitical conflicts because they always seem to be non-events from the markets’ perspective.”
“The slowdown in the Chinese economy has been underway for some time now and has lasted longer than anyone thought it would. The government is providing stimulus but economic growth is still declining. The official growth figure is around 7%, but unofficial estimates are nearer the 3-4% level. It is clear that the Chinese government is not just going to stand back and watch everything collapse. Of course there are limits to the extent to which an economy can be controlled; but if anyone can do it, it’s the Chinese.”
“You really can’t imagine it happening – but that’s what we thought six months ago and Donald Trump is still doing well in the opinion polls. He might even become the Republican candidate. But he won’t have much chance against Hillary Clinton. That said, US elections don’t have much impact on the markets, unless you believe in the presidential cycle, that is. In that case you shouldn’t hold equities in 2016, but 2017 and 2018 will be great years for stocks.”
‘There is more chance of a Brexit than of Trump becoming US president’
“There is little chance of a Brexit, but it is still more likely than Trump becoming US president. As a result of the refugee problem, anti-EU sentiment is increasing in the United Kingdom. Many British people see the EU as an expensive, paper tiger. However one would expect good sense to prevail in the referendum. Recent polls show that the number of EU proponents is falling, but that they still form a clear majority.”
“Our base scenario is still for the US dollar to rise on the back of Fed rates hikes. There’s a risk that everyone expects this and is already positioned for it to happen. If US growth stagnates and the Fed decides not to raise interest rates further, it could lead to a short squeeze. At the moment we prefer European stocks to their US counterparts and that won’t change if the euro appreciates by a couple of percent.”
“This seems likely and is our base scenario for 2016. Fed Chair Janet Yellen carefully prepared the ground for the first rate hike, which went off without a hitch as far as the markets were concerned. It remains to be seen whether the same will happen this year in the event of further rate hikes.”
“At the end of 2015, it became clear that ECB president Mario Draghi had overplayed his hand and he was publicly called to order by his fellow board members. Sentiment within the ECB seems to be less unanimously positive than we thought, which is worth bearing in mind. Overall things are not looking too bad in Europe and further easing is less likely than in Japan. The challenge lies in the fact that the effects of the policy will gradually weaken over time.”
“Imagination is running rife when it comes to technology stocks, certainly in the case of a few names. Expectations for Big Data, the Internet of Things and the Sharing Economy have all become exceedingly optimistic. You can’t project ahead using existing trends indefinitely. Of course we will witness major new developments, but there is a risk that to a large extent these are already priced in.”
“This would be nice and is quite feasible, but the question is within what timeframe. The conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran could push up oil prices, but that’s not something we want to happen. Production levels are still high while demand has not picked up significantly. A very strong recovery in the commodities market is not really on the cards.”
“You can see it happening. Sweden has ‘closed’ the border with Denmark, which has ‘closed’ the border with Germany. There seems to be no large-scale, clear strategy. The question is whether this will impact the markets. Perhaps it could, if all the dissatisfaction culminates in a Brexit.”
“There is no doubt we’ll see more defaults. But as long as the US economy continues to grow, I don’t expect it to be a tidal wave. However, if economic growth ebbs away, we could see defaults occurring, which in turn make it more difficult for companies to borrow, creating a vicious circle. Looking at current corporate refinancing requirements, I don’t think this is a major threat for 2016 or 2017.”
“An unexpected return of high levels of inflation would be the best example of a black swan. Only it’s difficult to see where this could happen. Perhaps as a result of a tight US labor market and rising wages in China, but these are both still a long way off. If inflation does re-emerge, it will be totally unexpected and the impact on the financial markets – particularly the bond market – will be huge.”