belgiumfr
 High yield indices don’t make good benchmarks

High yield indices don’t make good benchmarks

26-01-2021 | Vision
Certain features that are typical of high yield corporate bonds impose costs on high yield portfolios. These costs are not reflected in high yield indices, which means that portfolio managers are put at a disadvantage and that returns of passive high yield funds are structurally lower than the index.
  • Patrick  Houweling
    Patrick
    Houweling
    Co-Head of Quant Fixed Income
  • Sander  Bus
    Sander
    Bus
    Co-head Credit team
  • Robbert-Jan 't Hoen
    Robbert-Jan
    't Hoen
    Researcher

Speed read

  • High yield portfolio managers face costs not reflected in the index return
  • A high yield index therefore does not make a good benchmark
  • Instead, high yield funds should be compared with one another
How is it possible that so few active high yield managers outperform their index, and that passive managers lag theirs by more than their management fee? Our research shows that a high yield index is not a useful benchmark for evaluating portfolio returns, and that an alternative approach is needed.
Découvrez les dernières perspectives
Découvrez les dernières perspectives
Inscrivez-vous

High yields come at a cost

High yield corporate bonds offer several attractive investment features, such as coupon rates and returns that are higher than that of investment grade assets. This comes at a cost, of course. This sector of the credit market also presents challenges for investors, such as limited liquidity, defaults, rating migrations and bonds that are callable before maturity. These characteristics imply a variety of costs that are not reflected in the index returns. The underperformance of passively managed ETFs, for instance, illustrates the difficulties of generating index-like returns in the high yield market.

As long as indices do not contain all the costs that accrue in practice, high yield indices are not a fair reflection of the potential returns from a high yield credit portfolio. This means that they are not suitable as benchmarks for evaluating fund manager performance.

What would be a better performance yardstick?

A different take on relative performance

Our recommendation for investors in high yield funds is to compare portfolio performances with one another, rather than with an index.

For managers who use the same index, a solution would be to compare performance amongst the managers. Where different indices are used, a solution could be to determine the relative performance of each manager – relative to the specific index used – and then to compare the outperformance amongst managers.

Our recommendation for investors in high yield funds is to compare portfolio performances with one another, rather than with an index

It is quite possible in this context that outperformance will be mainly negative for both active and passive managers. As our research shows, this does not automatically mean that all managers have performed badly, but it does make a clear statement about the use of indices as benchmarks.

Logo

Décharge légale Agree

Les informations présentes sur ce site Web sont destinées exclusivement aux professionnels. Un investisseur professionnel est : un investisseur qui, à titre professionnel, dispose d'assez de connaissances et d'une expertise et d'une expérience suffisantes pour pouvoir évaluer de manière adéquate les risques financiers liés aux décisions d'investissement prises par lui-même.

Les visiteurs de ce site Web doivent être conscients du fait qu’ils sont eux-mêmes tenus de respecter toutes les lois et règlements en vigueur dans leur pays.

En cliquant sur J'accepte, vous confirmez que vous êtes un investisseur professionnel. Si vous cliquez sur Je n'accepte pas, vous êtes orienté vers la partie réservée aux particuliers.

Je n’accepte pas