japanja
talk-22-240x95.png
Talk ‘22: ‘Staying the course is crucial’

Talk ‘22: ‘Staying the course is crucial’

17-12-2021 | インタビュー

Covid-19 has shown us that it is important to stick to our approach, says Wilma de Groot, Co-head of Quant Equity Portfolio Management. In our 2022 outlook interview series, Robeco’s experts answer five key questions about their investing arenas.

What is the big thing to watch in 2022?

“Well, it won't surprise you that I'm very bullish on quant investing. We have endured a harsh quant winter from 2018 to 2020.1 This was characterized by strong performance from large-cap growth stocks, that our quant strategies typically don’t favor due to their value tilt. And of course, these large-cap names can continue to do well for a while. But this reminds me of the early 2000s, a period synonymous with the tech bubble. Similar to now, tech-related growth stocks embarked on a steep rally in the late 1990s, causing quant equity strategies to underperform, before they reversed their gains in the early 2000s. This was followed by a more ‘normal’ stage of quant equity performance.”

“A recent Robeco research paper highlights the cyclical variation in equity factor returns.2 Equity factors typically deliver returns above their long-term average premiums during the normal stage of the cycle. But once in a while, which is roughly once every decade, this phase is interrupted by either a growth rally or a value crash, during which equity factors typically underperform. These periods are then followed by reversals, before we re-enter the calm, normal stage of equity factor returns. Historically, we have seen a few of these episodes. Blue-chip stocks surged during the Nifty Fifty era of the early 1970s, energy and materials sectors rallied at the end of the 1970s on rising commodity prices, and of course we had the tech bubble of the late 1990s. What these episodes have in common is that they were followed by reversals, and then a more normal stage of equity factor performance.”

“So, we have the impression that the prevalent large-cap stock rally driven by ‘big tech’ could be due for a reversal in the future. In our view, this is also confirmed by the valuations of factors which appear to be very cheap, while sentiment has also improved, especially for the value factor.3 We are already seeing a turnaround in the emerging markets (EM) space. Indeed, our EM-focused quant equity strategies have generally enjoyed a pick-up in performance this year. This is interesting because there is still a lingering feeling that quant equity strategies are still navigating a difficult period. But the picture has already changed within EMs. I also get the sense that investors are warming up to quant strategies again, as we are seeing increasing interest in our solutions. So quant investing is definitely the big thing to watch in 2022.”

サステナビリティに関する最新の「インサイト」を読む
サステナビリティに関する最新の「インサイト」を読む
配信登録

What is the biggest change you have seen since Covid-19 kicked in, that has a lasting impact, also into 2022?

“From a quant investing perspective, we do not foresee a permanent market impact due to Covid-19. We have of course witnessed increased volatility and trading volumes, as well as somewhat higher turnover during the March 2020 crash. But we have already observed situations like this in the past, like the examples I outlined earlier. The good news is that these periods have historically always been followed by a normal stage of quant equity performance. Using the tech bubble example again, there is often a belief that things are different and a new economy has arrived when we encounter periods like these. This has previously led to incorrect proclamations, including that value investing is dead. With hindsight, we know that value did recover from the tech bubble, and was one of the best-performing factors in the subsequent period, also within the IT sector.”

“So the main lesson for us as quant investors is that it is important to stick to our approach. This also allows us to capitalize on the recoveries in factor performance. For example, if we would have changed our strategy by lowering our exposure to the value factor given its publicized struggles, then we would have not benefited as much from the bounce in its performance in late 2020 and early 2021. So, this serves as confirmation that we have seen similar situations before and that staying the course is crucial.”

Where are you most out of consensus with your approach or vision?

“Part of our research effort is focused on diversifying our approach through the use of alternative data and machine learning. The strict process we follow when testing new variables or methods is where we differ from most quant investors. While we acknowledge that some new data items might not have long histories, the coverage should at least be sufficient and span across multiple markets worldwide. The quality of the data should also be high enough, while variables have to pass our stringent tests. For example, they must exhibit strong standalone performance and survive numerous sensitivity analyses, including slight changes in variable definitions. Moreover, any new variable must add value on top of our existing enhanced factors. We often find that most variables fail at this stage of testing.”

“As an example, we have done quite a bit of work on intangible data such as goodwill and R&D in the past. We are now diving deeper and looking more at unstructured data, such as patent information including the number of patents registered by a company, or their quality based on citations. Some of the standalone results are promising. For instance, we observed that data on the number of patents are a good steer for sector allocation, however, they do not add significant value for stock selection purposes. On the other hand, the data on the quality of patents produced good stock selection results, but we found this was already captured in R&D data. Thus, this variable does not add more value on top of our existing ones. Our approach in using alternative data and machine learning is also somewhat different in that we use it for both return and risk predictions. In terms of the latter, we are looking at techniques that can help us to reduce our portfolios’ exposure to distress risk.”

What is the biggest ‘external’ challenge or game changer in 2022 (think of government policies, regulations, central bank policies, inflation, etc.)?

“A topical issue for investors is sustainability. While we don’t view it as a challenge, it definitely is a game changer. There is a lot of momentum in terms of policies and regulations in this space, such as legislation on climate change, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to mention a few. Investors are increasingly focusing on how to position their portfolios in respect to these developments. This can be related to just one sustainability dimension, such as carbon footprint reduction. Or they could look at an integrated multidimensional approach, that targets carbon footprint reduction with SDG integration and exposure to higher scoring ESG companies, for example. Investors could also investigate how they could best combine sustainability preferences with financial objectives.”

“Alongside this, we are seeing significant demand for strategies in which the tracking error budget is used only to cater to sustainability preferences. This speaks to our relatively new ‘Sustainable Core’ strategies. We believe flexibility in design and customized solutions are key, given that clients have varying financial and sustainability goals. The rules-based and systematic nature of our quant investing platform makes it suitable for the development of customized client portfolios. This is supplemented by our institutional knowledge in the fields of quant and sustainability investing. We believe this can allow us to offer the best possible solutions for our clients.”

“Investors are also thinking more about how to make an impact. We believe voting and engagement play an important role. Through these tools, shareholders can change or reshape corporate agendas. In one of our research papers, however, we illustrated that asset managers – particularly large and passive players – generally vote against most environmental and social proposals.4 So, there are still big steps for the industry to take in terms of voting. We expect increased attention on this front. In our view, the role of active and passive management is also crucial. This is because when engagements are unsuccessful, passive managers cannot divest from the affected companies as long as they form part of the index that they track.”

What is your personal ambition/inspiration that will help you navigate through the coming year?

“Covid-19 has brought to light numerous concerns around personal limitations, many of which I’m sure most people can agree were inconvenient. For example, work-life imbalances spring to mind. Personally, I found the period of school lockdowns quite difficult to manage as a parent. This also coincided with the challenges we faced at work as a result of the market drawdown. On the flipside, however, the lockdowns also resulted in less business travel. All in all, I am grateful that I got to spend more time with my husband and three young boys. They have certainly given me a lot of energy and motivation throughout this time, and it goes without saying that I would like to keep enjoying the benefits of having more family time in 2022. Of course, we could definitely do without further school closures.”

“Broadly sticking to reduced levels of business travel would be welcomed in the coming year, along with the associated carbon reduction. On top of this, and on a more personal level, I would like to further reduce my meat consumption. While I have progressively done so over the past few years, my aim is to really bring down my intake to a bare minimum in 2022. Luckily, my kids are swaying me towards vegetarian alternatives.”

1 Blitz, D., May 2021, “The quant crisis of 2018-2020: Cornered by ‘big growth”, Journal of Portfolio Management.
2 Blitz, D., September 2021, “The quant cycle”, working paper.
3 Baltussen, G., Hanauer, M. X., Schneider, S., and Swinkels, L., September 2021, “What valuations and interest rates tell us about equity factors ”, Robeco article.
4 Groot, de, W., Koning, de, J., and Winkel, van, S., June 2021, “Sustainable voting behavior of asset managers: do they walk the walk?”, Journal of Impact and ESG Investing.

2022 Outlook interview series
2022 Outlook interview series
Read them all

重要事項

当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。

ご契約に際しては、必要に応じ専門家にご相談の上、最終的なご判断はお客様ご自身でなさるようお願い致します。

運用を行う資産の評価額は、組入有価証券等の価格、金融市場の相場や金利等の変動、及び組入有価証券の発行体の財務状況による信用力等の影響を受けて変動します。また、外貨建資産に投資する場合は為替変動の影響も受けます。運用によって生じた損益は、全て投資家の皆様に帰属します。したがって投資元本や一定の運用成果が保証されているものではなく、投資元本を上回る損失を被ることがあります。弊社が行う金融商品取引業に係る手数料または報酬は、締結される契約の種類や契約資産額により異なるため、当資料において記載せず別途ご提示させて頂く場合があります。具体的な手数料または報酬の金額・計算方法につきましては弊社担当者へお問合せください。

当資料及び記載されている情報、商品に関する権利は弊社に帰属します。したがって、弊社の書面による同意なくしてその全部もしくは一部を複製またはその他の方法で配布することはご遠慮ください。

商号等: ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社  金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長(金商)第2780号

加入協会: 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会