japanja
Diverging fortunes for low-risk stocks as EM and DM decouple

Diverging fortunes for low-risk stocks as EM and DM decouple

23-10-2018 | インサイト

So far, 2018 has been marked by a clear decoupling of emerging and developed equity markets. This has led to a divergence in the performance of our low volatility strategies across the world.

  • Jan Sytze  Mosselaar
    Jan Sytze
    Mosselaar
    CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager

Speed read

  • US stocks keep pushing developed markets up
  • Sentiment has deteriorated in emerging markets
  • Low-risk stocks outperform in EM, but lag in DM

Developed and emerging markets appear to have taken different routes in 2018. While developed markets (DM) have experienced a continuation of the uptrend seen in previous years, mainly driven by the strong performance of US stocks, emerging markets (EM) have been through a rough patch. Sentiment has especially deteriorated in countries like Brazil, South Africa, Turkey and China. Unsurprisingly, low-risk and high-dividend investment styles have worked relatively well in these markets.

The different trajectories of EM and DM stocks are reflected in the performance of different factors in both regions, as shown is Figure 1. Low volatility, the main factor in the bottom-up selection process of Robeco’s Conservative Equities strategies, illustrates this very clearly. Since the low volatility factor helps reduce losses, its contribution to performance has been negative in DM and positive in EM. The significant outperformance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index relative to its DM counterpart also shows how low-risk stocks have done much better in EM than in DM, relative to the market index.

Figure 1 | Market and absolute factor performance 2018 YTD

Source: Bloomberg, Robeco, MSCI. Returns of the MSCI Index, MSCI Minimum Volatility (‘low volatility’), MSCI Value-weighted, MSCI Momentum and MSCI High Dividend, for MSCI World and MSCI EM, net returns in USD.

This is fully in line with our expectations, given the higher volatility in emerging markets this year. It should also be noted that while it did not support performance in the US, the low volatility factor had a positive impact in more troubled developed markets such as Europe and Japan.

A similar observation can be made for the value and momentum factors. This is important as value and momentum characteristics are also taken into account in the stock selection process of our Conservative Equities strategies, although low volatility remains the main driver.

Momentum falters in EM

Momentum stocks are the most telling example. The momentum factor, which has delivered a stellar performance in both developed and emerging markets over the last few years, has continued to do well in developed markets, but not in emerging markets. This is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 | Momentum’s YTD relative performance

Source: Bloomberg, Robeco, MSCI. Chart shows the relative performance of the MSCI Momentum Index versus the MSCI World and MSCI in EM, based on total net returns, all in USD.

This performance gap is also in line with our expectations, as several trends in emerging markets have reversed in 2018. The most notable have been the changing fortunes of Chinese stocks, as the rise of index heavyweights Alibaba and Tencent (which together currently account for 25% of the MSCI China) has faltered this year.

The divergence in performance across factors and regions has been clearly visible in the relative returns of our Conservative Equities strategies this year. As low volatility and high dividend stocks have performed well in emerging markets, Robeco’s EM Conservative Equities strategy has shown clear added value compared to the volatile MSCI EM Index. Meanwhile, as the value factor and in particular the high dividend style clearly haven’t paid off in DM, Robeco’s DM Conservative Equities strategy has lagged the market index.

Although defensive and high dividend strategies have lagged the market in the US this year, it is reasonable to expect that these investment styles will do relatively well when volatility rises again. The recent volatility seen in emerging markets and the subsequent relative factor performance might be a sign of more turbulent times ahead. And the relatively high valuation multiples seen in the US equity market should also be considered a warning sign. In a previous paper1, we showed that high valuation levels are historically associated with higher risk levels going forward.

1 P. van Vliet, 2018, ‘Risky CAPE Repair the roof when the sun is shining’, Robeco article.

EM/DM decoupling results in factor performance divergence in 2018
Read the related note

重要事項

当資料は情報提供を目的として、Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V.が作成した英文資料、もしくはその英文資料をロベコ・ジャパン株式会社が翻訳したものです。資料中の個別の金融商品の売買の勧誘や推奨等を目的とするものではありません。記載された情報は十分信頼できるものであると考えておりますが、その正確性、完全性を保証するものではありません。意見や見通しはあくまで作成日における弊社の判断に基づくものであり、今後予告なしに変更されることがあります。運用状況、市場動向、意見等は、過去の一時点あるいは過去の一定期間についてのものであり、過去の実績は将来の運用成果を保証または示唆するものではありません。また、記載された投資方針・戦略等は全ての投資家の皆様に適合するとは限りません。当資料は法律、税務、会計面での助言の提供を意図するものではありません。

ご契約に際しては、必要に応じ専門家にご相談の上、最終的なご判断はお客様ご自身でなさるようお願い致します。

運用を行う資産の評価額は、組入有価証券等の価格、金融市場の相場や金利等の変動、及び組入有価証券の発行体の財務状況による信用力等の影響を受けて変動します。また、外貨建資産に投資する場合は為替変動の影響も受けます。運用によって生じた損益は、全て投資家の皆様に帰属します。したがって投資元本や一定の運用成果が保証されているものではなく、投資元本を上回る損失を被ることがあります。弊社が行う金融商品取引業に係る手数料または報酬は、締結される契約の種類や契約資産額により異なるため、当資料において記載せず別途ご提示させて頂く場合があります。具体的な手数料または報酬の金額・計算方法につきましては弊社担当者へお問合せください。

当資料及び記載されている情報、商品に関する権利は弊社に帰属します。したがって、弊社の書面による同意なくしてその全部もしくは一部を複製またはその他の方法で配布することはご遠慮ください。

商号等: ロベコ・ジャパン株式会社  金融商品取引業者 関東財務局長(金商)第2780号

加入協会: 一般社団法人 日本投資顧問業協会