June marks the 10th anniversary of the signing of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, a global framework for business that places a strong emphasis on due diligence to detect human rights abuses. Investors including Robeco follow these principles as a blueprint for best practice in this area.
Some high-profile, persistent human rights abuses include child labor in the mining of minerals for car batteries, modern slavery on fishing boats, and poor working conditions in textiles that has sometimes proved fatal.
Robeco routinely engages with companies on their human rights due diligence, enabling companies to spot abuses both in their own operations and in their supply chains, particularly when ingredients or materials are sourced from high-risk areas with poor legal or regulatory protections.
“Human rights due diligence is a powerful tool to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how a company addresses the most severe risks to people in connection to its business,” says Essink, who wrote a blog for the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre to commemorate the anniversary.
Proactively thinking
“Human rights is such a broad topic that we need companies to proactively think about where their greatest impacts on human rights are, and what the most salient issues are that they should be caring about in their industry.”
“One of the biggest problems are conflict-affected areas and high-risk industries such as textiles and fishing. Then there is the issue of data collection and privacy in the big tech companies. All have human rights implications.”
“The UN Guiding Principles is a framework that Robeco uses very actively. We regularly engage with companies on how they ensure they are safeguarding human rights and how they're implementing these principles.”
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark
How well this is done within an industry is monitored by the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB), which scores companies on a set of indicators, including due diligence. In March 2020, Robeco was one of 174 international investors taking part in an initiative coordinated by the Investor Alliance for Human Rights (IAHR) that wrote to the 95 companies that failed to score any points on the due diligence indicators in the 2019 CHRB ranking.
“While some companies improved, 79 continued to score zero points on human rights due diligence in the 2020 ranking, and are therefore included in the 2021 engagement target list that will address this,” says Essink, Robeco’s advisory committee member for the IAHR.
“Nearly half of the 230 largest publicly traded companies in high-risk sectors measured against five human rights due diligence indicators scored zero points on human rights due diligence. This makes for very grim reading.”
Supply chain abuses
Many otherwise respectable companies often don’t know of the abuses that go on in their long and often complex supply chains, Essink says.
“The issue with Thai fishing boats concerned modern slavery and forced working for months at a time. The supermarkets that we engaged with several years ago who sourced their prawns from these boats had no idea that this was going on in their supply chains.”
“By doing better supply chain due diligence, they can check where they are sourcing from, and what standards are being upheld in the supply chain.”
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。