The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).
The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.
The new era of ‘Trumponomics’ will see a rise in protectionism and isolationism, leading to souring trade relations that do not bode well for growth, says Chief Economist Léon Cornelissen.
Newly inaugurated President Donald Trump will usher in a new era of looking to fiscal rather than monetary policy to stimulate the United States economy – a model that ironically may strengthen monetary policy as the central bank subsequently raises rates, he says.
“In his inauguration speech, Trump dashed any hopes on a softening of his protectionist stance showed during his campaign,” Cornelissen says. “The guiding principles will be ’America First’ and ‘buy American, hire American’, raising uncomfortable echoes of the 1930s.”
“The US will pull out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, negotiated under the former Obama administration with eleven Pacific Rim economies, including Japan but excluding China. And the governments of Canada and Mexico will be notified almost immediately that the new administration intends to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and withdraw from it unless the US gets a ‘satisfactory’ deal, implying ‘a fair deal’ to American workers.”
“China has been a frequent target of the president’s rhetoric: it has been threatened with 45% tariffs on its exports. It has also been accused of manipulating its currency to the detriment of US interests. Ironically, in the recent past, China has tried to dampen the weakening of the yuan vis-à-vis the US dollar by massive currency interventions, in line with US interests.”
“Europe has not been free from pressure either. In an interview with German newspaper Bild, Trump threatened to impose a 35% tariff – he called it a ‘tax’ – on every car that BMW exports to the US. It is clear that souring trade relations do not bode well for world economic growth, and could easily damage US growth prospects as well. It will also push up inflation, an inflation of the wrong type.”
Cornelissen says a potential positive, albeit with consequences for US national debt, would be Trump’s plans to use fiscal rather than monetary policy to stimulate the economy and create jobs – a tactic which Robeco highlighted as ‘Time for Plan B’ in its recent 2017 outlook.
“Fiscal policy will expand; firstly, individual and corporate tax rates will be lowered,” Cornelissen says. “Apart from that, Trump wants to implement vast public works to repair and rebuild US infrastructure. Also, he wishes to rebuild the American military, especially strengthening the size of the Air Force and Navy to assure the US’s unquestionable military dominance.”
“On the other hand, Social Security and Medicare benefits should be preserved. It is clear that a complete implementation of this agenda will lead to huge budget deficits, which would be unpopular with the substantial group of fiscal hawks within the Republican Party.”
‘It remains to be seen how substantial the fiscal push will be’
“It remains to be seen how substantial the fiscal push will be in the end. For infrastructure, proposals are floating to implement this primarily via tax credits and public/private partnerships, in which case it is doubtful if this will amount to anything substantial in macroeconomic terms. Fiscal hawks are also calling for budgetary neutral changes in taxation.”
“In the end it all depends on Trump’s cooperation with the US Congress, especially with the Senate, in which the Republicans have a small majority of two, and are far from the 60-40 ‘filibuster-proof’ majority that would allow them to essentially force through legislation.”
Regarding monetary policy, the Federal Reserve is likely to raise rates in 2017 – Robeco predicts three quarter-point rises, taking the minimum lending rate to 1.5% for the first time since the financial crisis. And that would further strengthen an already sky-high dollar, creating new economic problems for the US.
“With the US expansion already in its eighth year, and a continuing improving labor market leading to almost full employment, any additional fiscal push will lead to higher inflation and push the US central bank to higher interest rates,” Cornelissen says.
“The US dollar will strengthen and the US current account deficit will worsen. This last factor could easily stir up calls for more protectionist measures. During his campaign, Trump was highly critical of the Fed, which in his view was conducting overly loose monetary policy. It remains to be seen if his attitude changes when monetary policy starts to bite.”
Meanwhile, Trump’s campaign promised ambitious plans to unravel President Obama’s signature Affordable Care Act, along with a raft of regulations affecting Wall Street and the energy industry.
“A high priority of the new administration is unraveling Obamacare; the Dodd-Frank Act on financial reform could also be a casualty,” he says. “The US will also abandon its commitments under the Paris agreement on climate change, and roll back Obama’s Clean Power Plan.”
“Further afield, Trump has been sowing doubts about his commitment to NATO. His questioning of the US’s ‘One China’ policy regarding Taiwan is seen by some as an opening move in a negotiating process that would end with a US withdrawal from the West Pacific.”
“This isolationistic stance could easily lead to higher geopolitical tensions, as China and Russia will see it as an invitation to flex their muscles. A scrapping of sanctions relief under the Iran nuclear deal could also strain relations with European allies and raise geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. We’re in for a bumpy ride.”
A new era dawns for the United States, but how long will it take newly inaugurated President Trump to change the course of the supertanker that is America? In a series of four articles we analyze the likely economic effects, and the effect on the US companies in which we invest.