The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).
The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.
On June 23, 2016, the British will vote whether or not they want to remain a member of the European Union. In this article, three investors – Lukas Daalder, Mark Glazener and Kommer van Trigt - give their take on the consequences of a potential Brexit for, respectively, the main asset classes, global equities, and global bonds.
The latest polls (50/50) and bookmaker quotes (75/25 in favor of staying in the EU) clearly show that a Brexit outcome is far from certain. This means that markets certainly have not discounted the full impact yet. A Brexit outcome will therefore be seen as a negative surprise, which should trigger a flight to safety. This is generally considered as bad for stocks and positive for bonds. If Brexit were to materialize – which we do not deem likely - we expect the FTSE 100 index to plummet with, to a lesser extent, the Euro Stoxx 50 in its wake. On other equity markets trading will be volatile, but there we expect losses to remain limited.
As the Global Equity team finds an above average amount of attractive stocks in the UK market, the global equity portfolio is overweight the UK. Holdings include British American Tobacco, Compass, Experian, Reckitt Benckiser, Rio Tinto and Vodafone. Besides that, the global equity strategy is invested in Hong Kong-listed HBSC and Royal Dutch Shell, which has a Dutch and UK listing.
The common denominator of these stocks is that the largest part of their revenues comes from overseas. In the event of a Brexit, which should have a dampening effect on British GBP, these companies will benefit, as they won’t be harmed by sterling weakness and have little exposure to the UK economy.
Despite the overweight resulting from stock selection, we have hedged the country exposure to the UK back to benchmark weight with FTSE 100 futures, in view of the Brexit risk. The position in pound sterling is also neutral versus the benchmark.
Furthermore, we are staying clear of real estate companies and banks, which have a large exposure to the UK economy and would suffer from weak sterling. Financial companies are also most likely to be impacted because they are major exporters of services. While the WTO sets international trade standards for goods, there are no such rules for services. This means that the UK will have to rearrange its trading relationships with the whole world anew.
In the Global Fixed Income team, we also think that a win for the leave vote would be the surprise outcome and would therefore have the biggest market impact. Although sterling would be hit hard, we do not believe the Bank of England will tighten monetary policy to support the currency and dampen imported inflation. The Bank of England has shown before that it is willing to look through these temporary and transitory effects. Furthermore a weakening of the British pound – as long as it takes place orderly - might even be welcome to offset some of the negative economic consequences. A dovish stance is more likely, but probably the central bank will want to take some time to assess the situation before setting a new course.
In the case of a Brexit vote win, we do not expect severe funding problems for UK banks. However, would they arise, other central banks such as the Fed and the European Central Bank would immediately help out with swap arrangements to provide the necessary US dollars and euros. The potential impact on UK Gilts is more uncertain. With a budget deficit already more than 4% and a current account deficit running at 7%, long dated Gilts could face selling pressure from international investors.
Our base case scenario as of today is a win for the Bremain camp. Our holdings in UK government bonds are small. Within our corporate bond holdings a sizeable part consists of financial institutions. Amongst them are UK banks such as Barclays and Lloyds. At the start of the year these bonds underperformed other segments of the credit market in anticipation of a possible Brexit outcome. In relative terms, the fundamentals of UK banks are positive. Until now they recovered fastest in cleaning up their balance sheets. We expect these bonds to do well in case the stay vote would win. If the opposite occurs, some spread widening is to be expected, but current spreads have to some degree already factored in a negative outcome.
European politicians of the mainstream parties are terrified that a win for the Brexit camp will fuel Euroscepticism and support anti-EU parties throughout the continent. Which country will be next? Most likely the Euro system will be tested by investors and peripheral markets will come under pressure. As the ECB is already active in the market, we do not expect a replay of the 2011/2012 sovereign crisis, but we do sense that peripheral markets are too complacent. Political risk throughout the region is on the rise, debt dynamics remain worrisome to say the least and appetite for economic reforms is absent. In our fixed income portfolios we have scaled down exposure to these markets significantly.