The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).
The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.
How innovative should governments be? Very innovative, according to Mariana Mazzucato. Robeco’s chief economist Léon Cornelissen reviews her book The Entrepreneurial State.
"The IMF should stop forecasting renewed growth and issue a warning that the global economy will remain weak and vulnerable unless world leaders act energetically to spur innovation and growth. Such an effort is long overdue," laments Ashoka Mody of the Bruegel think tank in his blog entitled ‘Another slow year for the global economy’, dated January 5.
Mariana Mazzucato, Professor in the Economics of Innovation at the UK’s University of Sussex is undoubtedly in complete agreement with him. In her engaging, sometimes amusing and controversial book The Entrepreneurial State she emphasizes the importance of government as the boldest and most valuable innovator.
Mazzucato is right to emphasize that although the pragmatic United States talks about little government interference and free markets, their large public investment programs in technology and innovation are actually why they are so successful. From internet, biotechnology, nanotechnology to shale gas, the government plays a key role in achieving innovation-driven growth.
An interesting example is the separate chapter on Apple. This is a company that understandably promotes the myth that it is primarily qualities like individual genius, eye for design, playfulness and even madness that are responsible for revolutionary products like the iPad and the iPhone. But without the large-scale government investment which made the internet and computer revolution possible, this would have only resulted in a new gadget and not in products that have drastically changed the way we work and communicate, argues Mazzucato.
One ironic detail is that Apple does not publish impressive R&D figures. But this is understandable because it does not focus its inventiveness on developing new technologies and components, but on integrating these into an innovative architecture. However, it is less ironic that the US government sees little in return for the investments that have actually made the iPhone so smart.
Mazzucato states that it is no coincidence that the weakest countries in the Eurozone are those that spend the least on R&D and promoting human capital. Yet these countries are also accused of spending too much. But to copy the American model you have to look at what they do, not at what they say. Smart, inclusive and sustainable growth doesn't just happen on its own.