If two portfolio managers have the same investment skills but one manager follows an investment strategy that relies on a higher level of breadth compared to the second manager, the first manager is more likely to outperform. The analogy can be made to the game of roulette in a casino. If the wheel spins 100 times and at each spin the player’s bet is EUR 1, the expected return is the same as when the wheel spins only once and the bet is EUR 100. But for ‘the house’, the first option is far more preferable, because the level of breadth is higher and it offers a better reward-risk ratio.

The quantitative equity strategies we offer at Robeco benefit from the implications that follow from this formula. First, the ‘skill’ lies in years of our in-house research on equity markets and investor behavior. This resulted in our Quantitative Stock Selection Models which are designed to systematically identify and exploit market inefficiencies arising as a result of predictable patterns in investor behavior. Second, the level of breadth is high since we can use our models to analyze thousands of stocks in only a short period of time.

Let’s take Robeco Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Equities as an example. The individual stock exposures are only 20 bps versus the benchmark, whereas a traditional portfolio manager can have an individual active weights of 300 bps or even more. However, since the individual active weights of Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Equities are small, the number of positions is in the hundreds and the level of breadth thus is high.

The combination of having a well-developed stock selection model with using a high level of breadth has led to a consistently strong track record for our Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Equities strategy (3 years = 1.24; and 5 years = 0.78, since inception= 1.27, as of end of March 2018).

Updated on 9 April 2018. This article was first published in January 2015.