chinazh
Sustainable Investing Glossary

Sustainable companies

Sustainable companies are those which score highly on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in their business operations. The degree to which a company is sustainable can be a crucial factor in deciding whether its stocks and bonds should be included in an investment portfolio. Robeco routinely screens all companies under consideration for inclusion in portfolios as standard practice, using different ESG thresholds depending on the type of fund or strategy.

Screening mostly takes two forms – negative and positive – backed by research and access to reliable data. Negative screening essentially means excluding those companies that do not meet pre-determined ESG standards and typically includes makers of controversial weapons, companies engaged in human rights abuses, or corporate governance failures such as corruption. Robeco also excludes all tobacco companies and those engaged in the extensive production or use of thermal coal, subject to certain thresholds. 

Positive screening means examining the ESG credentials of the companies that remain in the investment universe after the exclusions have been carried out. Different companies will get varying scores according to their business, and the E, S and G will have differing levels of importance according to the sector. For example, a mining company may score poorly on environmental management and social factors, but be superbly managed and score highly for governance. Conversely, banks may score highly for environmental and social factors, but poorly for governance due to their excessive risk-taking during the financial crisis. 

Some industries may also face contradictions in their ESG profiles. Electric car makers, for example, are seen as the solution to removing reliance on fossil-fuel powered internal combustion engines, and would naturally be considered as ‘sustainable companies’. However, some raw materials needed for car batteries such as cobalt or rare earth minerals are often produced in regions with poor labor practices and environmental records. A complete picture must therefore be established to ascertain a company’s true ESG credentials and whether it should be labeled as sustainable. 

As not all ESG factors are equally relevant, it is also important to only consider the most financially material factors – ESG issues that directly affect the company’s financial performance. This is a vital component in ESG integration in the decision-making process for investment funds, as screening needs to focus on metrics that would ultimately affect the company’s ability to create value, and therefore its future share price. Ultimately, companies and investment funds are judged on their financial performance, not the headlines they may make. Robeco has long believed that more sustainable companies create more value over time, as ESG allows for a better lens to assess business risks as well as opportunities.

See also: ESG, ESG integration, Best in class, Positive screening, Negative screening
Creating returns that benefit the world we live in
Creating returns that benefit the world we live in
Sustainable investing
Weighing the pros and cons of nuclear power as climate urgency grows
Weighing the pros and cons of nuclear power as climate urgency grows
Robeco has revised its stance on nuclear power as part of efforts to transition to a net zero economy.
12-07-2022 | 市场观点
Sustainable investing for insurers
Sustainable investing for insurers
The way in which insurers are treating sustainability and climate change has become more focused, a study by Milliman has revealed.
14-06-2022 | 市场观点
拥抱投资业的可持续发展革命
拥抱投资业的可持续发展革命
全球兴起向可持续发展深度转变的浪潮,这对资产所有者和资产管理者而言意味着什么?Victor Verberk在Top1000基金大会的开幕式上作出了解答。
09-05-2022 | 市场观点