Sustainable investing is often seen as something only pursued by millennials who are jumping on a bandwagon with their trendy friends. It is true that this age group seems to have the biggest interest in SI, but it is certainly not a hype. In fact, interest in sustainability is spread across the generations, and its roots go back centuries.
Stereotypes about people who are seeking a more sustainable world tend to focus on those born since the mid-1980s, since research does show that millennials are more interested in the issue. They are more likely for example to buy organic food, demand Fairtrade coffee and be more concerned about human rights than their parents or grandparents.1
They also grew up in the internet age and have enjoyed greater access to information exposing unsustainable activities, becoming more politicized by it. Research in the US showed that millennials were the “most progressive generation in 50 years” and were making the country more liberal.2
But when it comes to investing, demand for sustainability is fairly evenly spread across all age groups, according to a 2017 questionnaire by Robeco into the tastes of its Dutch retail investors. Some 70% of people aged over 50 stated a clear interest in sustainability compared to 66% of 34 to 50-year-olds and 67% of 18 to 34-year-olds. While not an exhaustive scientific study, it did reveal that sustainability was as popular among middle-aged and older people than it was among the millennials.
Those who went on to invest in sustainable funds were 28% of the over-50s, 29% of the 34 to 50-year-olds and 26% of the 18 to 34-year-olds – again showing that interest is evenly spread across age brackets, with the middle-aged still slightly in the lead. Meanwhile, the average part of a portfolio invested sustainably was 29% for the over-50s, 30% for 34 to 50-year-olds and 33% for 18 to 34-year-olds – so here, the millennials are slightly in the lead, though not significantly, Robeco’s in-house research showed.
Sustainability is by no means a modern ‘fad’. Its origins go back to the 18th century church, when Quakers launched the first exclusions by refusing to invest in anything involved with the slave trade. In more recent times it picked up speed with the first equal rights legislation in the 1960s and the environmental campaigns of the 1970s. One of the first major uses of exclusions was seen in the 1970s when companies refused to invest in South Africa due to its apartheid regime.
It reached the global stage in 1987 when the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission) released its report, ‘Our Common Future’, tackling uncontrolled use of natural resources, led at the time by extensive deforestation. The document is most notable for coining the term ‘sustainable development’ that particularly aimed to encourage emerging markets to avoid destroying the environment as they pursued economic growth. In defining what its new phrase meant, Commission chair Gro Harlem Brundtland wrote: “Humanity has the ability to make development sustainable to ensure that it meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” 3
Another famous phrase, known as the ‘triple bottom line’, was coined not by a millennial, but a middle-aged British businessman in 1995. John Elkington said any enterprise needed to consider the three Ps of ‘People, Planet, Profit’ (and not just the final word) as each being equally important for the long-term success of society. This concept was adapted to become environmental, social and governance factors, or ESG, which now forms the bedrock of most sustainable investing processes.4
The ‘sustainable investing’ phrase and theme entered common usage in the following decade, when it first started to be taken seriously by investors. It went through various incarnations including ‘ethical investing’, ‘responsible investing’ and latterly ‘socially responsible investing or SRI’, before ‘sustainable investing’ was widely agreed to be the most appropriate moniker to capture the different investment strategies that take into account ESG factors.
As for a ‘hype’, the true globalization of sustainability achieved perhaps its finest hour with the United Nations Climate Change Conference, known as COP21, in Paris in 2015. It produced the Paris Agreement, which challenged the world to limit global warming to below two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels. It was ratified by 174 countries on 22 April 2016 – now designated by the UN as ‘Earth Day’.
So, while sustainable investing has been a fairly niche concept in the past, we are now clearly at an inflection point, and there is no way back.
1 Produce Retailer, ‘Younger consumers buy more organics’, 2017
2 The Millennial Pendulum: A new generation of voters and the prospects for a political realignment, 2009.
3 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: ‘Our Common Future’
4 John Elkington, ‘Enter the triple bottom line’, 2004
The content displayed on this website is exclusively directed at qualified investors, as defined in the swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 june 2006 ("cisa") and its implementing ordinance, or at “independent asset managers” which meet additional requirements as set out below. Qualified investors are in particular regulated financial intermediaries such as banks, securities dealers, fund management companies and asset managers of collective investment schemes and central banks, regulated insurance companies, public entities and retirement benefits institutions with professional treasury or companies with professional treasury.
The contents, however, are not intended for non-qualified investors. By clicking "I agree" below, you confirm and acknowledge that you act in your capacity as qualified investor pursuant to CISA or as an “independent asset manager” who meets the additional requirements set out hereafter. In the event that you are an "independent asset manager" who meets all the requirements set out in Art. 3 para. 2 let. c) CISA in conjunction with Art. 3 CISO, by clicking "I Agree" below you confirm that you will use the content of this website only for those of your clients which are qualified investors pursuant to CISA.
Representative in Switzerland of the foreign funds registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") for distribution in or from Switzerland to non-qualified investors is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, and the paying agent is UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich. Please consult www.finma.ch for a list of FINMA registered funds.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco/RobecoSAM AG product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, articles of association, prospectuses, key investor information documents and annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website, at the registered seat of the representative in Switzerland, as well as at the Robeco/RobecoSAM AG offices in each country where Robeco has a presence. In respect of the funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the representative in Switzerland.
This website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, the publication or availability of this website is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this website.