Important legal information

The content displayed on this website is exclusively directed at qualified investors, as defined in the swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 june 2006 ("cisa") and its implementing ordinance, or at “independent asset managers” which meet additional requirements as set out below. Qualified investors are in particular regulated financial intermediaries such as banks, securities dealers, fund management companies and asset managers of collective investment schemes and central banks, regulated insurance companies, public entities and retirement benefits institutions with professional treasury or companies with professional treasury.

The contents, however, are not intended for non-qualified investors. By clicking "I agree" below, you confirm and acknowledge that you act in your capacity as qualified investor pursuant to CISA or as an “independent asset manager” who meets the additional requirements set out hereafter. In the event that you are an "independent asset manager" who meets all the requirements set out in Art. 3 para. 2 let. c) CISA in conjunction with Art. 3 CISO, by clicking "I Agree" below you confirm that you will use the content of this website only for those of your clients which are qualified investors pursuant to CISA.

Representative in Switzerland of the foreign funds registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") for distribution in or from Switzerland to non-qualified investors is Robeco Switzerland AG, Josefstrasse 218, 8005 Zürich, and the paying agent is UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich. Please consult www.finma.ch for a list of FINMA registered funds.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco/Robeco Switzerland product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, articles of association, prospectuses, key investor information documents and annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website, at the registered seat of the representative in Switzerland, as well as at the Robeco/Robeco Switzerland offices in each country where Robeco has a presence. In respect of the funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the representative in Switzerland.

This website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, the publication or availability of this website is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this website.

I Disagree
When a high yield can be too high – beware the triple-Cs

When a high yield can be too high – beware the triple-Cs

13-03-2014 | Insight

The search for yield can come at a price if investors chase bigger returns without factoring in the extra risk involved, warns Robeco’s Sander Bus.

  • Sander  Bus
    Sander
    Bus
    CFA, Managing Director, Co-head Credit team, Portfolio Manager and Head High Yield

Speed read

  • Spreads have narrowed with sovereign bonds 
  • Some investors now chasing yields in CCC 
  • Not enough reward for the extra risk taken

The returns on high yield corporate bonds have progressively come down, for two reasons. Firstly, interest rates have gradually risen, which means bond values fall. In addition to this, the spread – the difference between credit yields and those of benchmark government bonds - have shrunk. This makes them relatively less attractive to government bonds for investors who look to bank the difference contained in the spread. 

To compensate for this, many investors are now chasing the higher returns available in bonds with lower credit ratings, but they are not being sufficiently compensated for the extra risk, says Bus. 

His Global High Yield Bonds fund applies a conservative approach in its investment style, meaning that it focuses more on the better-quality names within the high yield universe and thus has an underweight exposure to the riskier names that would fall in the CCC-rated category. The fund prefers to build exposure to the BB and B-rated corporates, which are below investment grade but carry a relatively lower chance of default than the triple-C category.

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

How credit spreads between corporate and government bonds have fallen over the past year.
Source: Bloomberg

Price for taking risk is too high

“We aim to get the best possible returns for investors, but there comes a point when gaining a high yield comes at too high a price in terms of the risk taken,” says Bus. 

“Triple C’ is a category where returns are high but the risks are also higher. We believe that there is insufficient compensation in that segment for the risk you are taking. It is now wise to largely avoid over-exposure to this segment, because when the market turns, triple-C is expected to be the underperforming category.” 

“Current spreads just don’t justify investing in triple-C bonds. If you look at the default and recovery rates, you are not rewarded for the average default scenario in CCC,” says Bus. 

“They’ve returned more in the past, but at this phase in the cycle, it is unwise to put too much store in them now. It’s a mistake that some investors make when they focus on return targets and not on risk. We should perhaps just all accept that returns will be lower all round in 2014, thanks to improving economies and tapering leading to the end of easy money, and not chase the most risky bonds.” 

The supply of such bonds has increased lately as private equity sponsors take advantage of the strong high yield market by selling tempting types of bond when they take companies private. “We are seeing more issuance of bonds rated triple-C and also Pay-in-Kind (PIK) notes, where you don’t get cash interest but additional nominal (face value) in the bonds. This is increasing risk on the balance sheets of companies.”

The credit rating scale: CCC is defined as ‘currently vulnerable’. "
Source: Standard & Poor’s

Maturities and durations are key

It is possible though to be more selective within an existing fund universe without compromising returns or risks, he says. At the moment, spread curves are pretty steep, which means an investor gets relatively more return in bonds that take longer to mature, when they must be repaid by the issuer. Put simply, switching to longer-dated bonds by extending average maturities in the portfolio gives you more pick-up. 

“Usually the high yield market has pretty flat spread curves, where owning longer-dated bonds does not make much difference to yields. So extending maturities is a good means of picking up more spread against sovereigns,” he says. 

Investors though have tended lately to go in the other direction, demanding bonds with shorter durations because they fear that interest rates will rise. If this happens, the bonds become progressively less valuable, so it can make more sense to buy the securities that take less time to mature. 

"However, it’s much smarter to hedge your interest rate risk if you are afraid of a high duration than to chase lower duration bonds,” says Bus. Low-duration funds take out the rate risk but also reduce the available spread. Someone who invests in high yield bonds ultimately wants to be exposed to the spread.”

Subjects related to this article are: