australieen
Tweaking a popular low volatility index

Tweaking a popular low volatility index

14-02-2018 | From the field

Investment solutions based on popular smart beta indices have enjoyed tremendous success. These generic products, however, raise serious issues regarding their ability to efficiently harvest factor premiums.

  • David Blitz
    David
    Blitz
    Head of Quant Research

This study1 by MSCI examined how their popular Minimum Volatility (MV) index could be modified in order to address various concerns. The authors show that concentration, sustainability, and valuation concerns can be mitigated by using appropriate but simple optimization constraints.

These results are consistent with our own experience with low volatility strategies. However, we wonder how many passive investors will be able to benefit from these insights, as long as these are not incorporated into the standard MSCI MV index, which is likely to remain the preferred choice for most investors.

The study also found that adding a ‘maximum diversification’ (MD) constraint to the MV index leads to a clear deterioration in performance, which is interesting given the popularity of MD strategies. The study showed that MD tilts the portfolio towards stocks with high stock-specific risks, and that this hurts performance, given the poor long-term performance characteristics of such stocks.

1 Alighanbari, Doole & Melas, ‘Managing Risks Beyond Volatility’, Journal of Index Investing, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2017, pp. 68-76.

Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe
From the field
From the field

Our researchers publish many whitepapers based on their own empirical studies; they also follow quantitative research done by others.

Read all articles
Subjects related to this article are:

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree