Fund | Reference index | |
---|---|---|
1 month | ||
3 months | ||
YTD | ||
1 year | ||
2 years | ||
3 years | ||
5 years | ||
10 years | ||
{{'fund.detail.performance.period.sinceInception' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.sinceStart.startDate,'MM-YYYY') ]}} |
Fund | Reference index | |
---|---|---|
Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was 1.39%. The index return for European subordinated financial debt was 0.9% in August. Credit spreads tightened by 27 basis points to 196 basis points, which means that the spread return of subordinated financial debt amounted to 1.4%. A small rise in underlying government bond yields contributed negatively to the market return. The portfolio return was better than that of the index. The portfolio benefited from the beta overweight position, as spreads tightened. The contribution of issuer selection was close to zero during the month. On a risk-adjusted basis, bank CoCos lagged the market in August. Our overweight exposure contributed negatively to the performance. Looking at individual issuers, the best performers on a risk-adjusted basis were Leaseplan, BNP Cardiff and Axa. Laggards were Rabobank, RBIA and BBVA.
3 years | 5 years | ||
---|---|---|---|
Tracking error ex-post (%) |
|
||
Information ratio | |||
Sharpe ratio | |||
Alpha (%) | |||
Beta |
|
||
Standard deviation |
|
||
Max. monthly gain (%) |
|
||
Max. monthly loss (%) |
|
3 years | 5 years | ||
---|---|---|---|
Months outperformance | |||
Hit ratio (%) | |||
Months Bull market | |||
Months outperformance Bull | |||
Hit ratio Bull (%) | |||
Months Bear market | |||
Months outperformance Bear | |||
Hit ratio Bear (%) |
Fund | Reference index | ||
---|---|---|---|
Rating | |||
Option Adjusted Modified Duration (years) | |||
Maturity (years) | |||
Yield to Worst (%) | |||
Green Bonds (%) |
Credit spreads continued to tighten in August, though the magnitude of the tightening was biggest in the first two weeks of the month. The new issue market opened up again in the last weeks of August and quite a large number of new deals was announced. Danske Bank and Erste Bank both issued bank Tier 2 bonds, while Sampo issued a 32NC12 insurance bond. Also in the CoCo market some new deals were announced. Barclays, Intesa and Bank of Ireland are some examples of issuers that tapped the market. The fund participated in many of the new deals, as issue spreads were still at elevated levels. Several banks have a desire to issue Tier 2 and Additional Tier 1 debt, as the supervisor now allows them to fill part of the pillar 2 capital buffer with subordinated debt. All banks have now reported second quarter earnings and it is interesting to see that in most cases capital ratios have actually improved a bit, even though credit losses have gone up. Company guidance for future credit losses by individual banks is typically within the range that we have used in our bank stress tests.
Name | Sector | Weight |
---|---|---|
All currency risks are hedged.
Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds fund make use of derivatives for hedging purposes as well as for investment purposes. These derivatives are very liquid.
This share class of the fund does not distribute dividend.
Our analysis of issuers goes beyond the traditional financial factors and includes the issuers’ performance on ESG factors. We deem it essential for a well-informed investment decision to take into account those ESG factors that have the potential to materially impact the financial performance of the issuer. This perfectly matches the basic need to avoid the losers in credit management, as many credit events in the past can be attributed to issues such as poorly designed governance frameworks, environmental issues, or weak health & safety standards. The aim of ESG integration is to improve the risk/return profile of the investments and does not have an impact goal. ESG analysis is fully integrated in the bottom-up security analysis. We have defined key ESG factors per industry, and for every company we analyze how the firm is positioned versus these key ESG factors, and how this impacts the fundamental credit quality.
Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds mainly invests in subordinated euro-denominated bonds issued by financial institutions. The fund offers a diversified exposure across 50-60 issuers, including the new style hybrid bonds that are being issued on the back of Basel III regulation. Focus of the fund are higher rated bonds (investment grade) with a tilt to Tier 2 bonds. The fund aims to outperform its index Barclays Euro-Aggregate: Corporates Financials Subordinated 2% Issuer Cap. The index applies an issuer cap to avoid concentration risk. The investment philosophy is based on managing a solid diversified portfolio with a long term view. Top-down beta positioning is based on the outcome of our credit quarterly outlook meeting, in which the team is discussing the fundamental market outlook, valuation of bond markets and market technicals. Bottom-up issuer research is executed by our credit analysts, who execute the fundamental analysis. The portfolio managers are responsible for the portfolio construction. A proprietary developed risk management approach avoids high risk concentration in the portfolio. As the investment process is well-structured and proven over time, it contributes to repeatable performance delivery. Duration of the portfolio is managed in line with the index and currency exposure is hedged.
Risk management is fully embedded in the investment process to ensure that positions always meet predefined guidelines.
A lot has changed since we increased the overweight position of the fund in March. Spreads have tightened significantly, but the current index spread is still higher than the long-term average. The economic environment is tough and credit losses for banks will rise, even though we know that short-term economic indicators show the situation is improving. Why are we willing to run an overweight position then? First of all, because if we look forward we expect that the economic situation will improve further. And we are aware that credit losses will be high, but our stress tests have demonstrated that banks are able to deal with that. In addition, both central banks and governments have continuously overdelivered when they announced measures to support economies. We think that the banking sector will benefit from all this support, as governments are aware that banks are part of the solution this time, not part of the problem. Market liquidity has improved and money is flowing into the credits asset class again. It seems clear that we will remain in a low yield environment for a while, which means that investors will look for parts of the market that still offer an interesting yield.
Mr. de Moor is a Senior Portfolio Manager and a member of the Credit team. Prior to joining Robeco in 2005, Mr. de Moor was employed by SBA Artsenpensioenfondsen as Senior Portfolio Manager Equities for six years. Before that, he worked at SNS Asset Management holding positions of Portfolio Manager Equities (three years) and Research Analyst (two years). Jan Willem de Moor started his career in the Investment Industry in 1994. He holds a Master's degree in Economics from Tilburg University.
The Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds fund is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts (of which four financials analysts). The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by dedicated quantitative researchers and fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.
Management company | |
Fund capital | |
Size of share class | |
Outstanding shares | |
ISIN | LU0622664224 |
Bloomberg | ROBFIIH LX |
Valoren | 12950163 |
WKN | A114R9 |
Availability | |
1st quotation date | 1305504000000 |
Close financial year | 31-12 |
Legal status | |
Tracking error limit (%) | |
Morningstar |
|
Reference index |
Ongoing charges |
|
---|---|
This fund deducts ongoing charges of |
These charges comprise | ||
---|---|---|
Management fee | ||
Service fee |
Transaction costs |
|
---|---|
The expected transaction costs are |
Performance fee |
|
---|---|
This fund may also deduct a performance fee of |
max entry fee | ||
Max exit fee | ||
Max sub fee | ||
Max switch fee |
The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.01% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.
Investors who are not subject to (exempt from) Dutch corporate-income tax (e.g. pension funds) are not taxed on the achieved result. Investors who are subject to Dutch corporate-income tax can be taxed for the result achieved on their investment in the fund. Dutch bodies that are subject to corporate-income tax are obligated to declare interest and dividend income, as well as capital gains in their tax return. Investors residing outside the Netherlands are subject to their respective national tax regime applying to foreign investment funds. We advise individual investors to consult their financial or tax adviser about the tax consequences of an investment in this fund in their specific circumstances before deciding to invest in the fund.
The Robeco Capital Growth Funds have not been registered under the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, nor the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. None of the shares may be offered or sold, directly or indirectly in the United States or to any US Person. A US Person is defined as (a) any individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States for federal income tax purposes; (b) a corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized under the laws of or existing in the United States; (c) an estate or trust the income of which is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of whether such income is effectively connected with a United States trade or business.