Disclaimer

The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).

The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.

Please confirm that you are a professional investor and/or institutional investor and that you have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website..

I Disagree
Investors face optimistic 2017 but with Trump risks

Investors face optimistic 2017 but with Trump risks

09-01-2017 | Insight

Investors will see the ‘winds of change’ in 2017. They will have reasons for optimism while facing new risks related to Trump, says Robeco’s Lukas Daalder.

  • Lukas Daalder
    Lukas
    Daalder
    Chief Investment Officer

Speed read

  • Consensus expects rising global growth and return of reflation
  • Shift from monetary to fiscal stimulus likely to boost stocks
  • Main risk arises from what President Trump will actually do

He says the consensus of market watchers is that more positivity than negativity can be expected from rising global growth, the emergence of reflation and a shift from monetary to fiscal stimulus, along with reactions either way to whatever incoming US President Donald Trump actual does.

“As has become a bit of a New Year’s tradition, we will not take a look at what we think 2017 will bring us, but rather by looking at what the consensus thinks is in store,” says Daalder, Chief Investment Officer of Robeco Investment Solutions. “We think the importance of the consensus is in general under-appreciated, and it remains the benchmark from which developments are assessed. If you look at the monthly US payrolls report for example, financial markets will not necessarily react to the absolute level of the number of jobs reported, but rather to how much it deviates from what the market expected.”

“This is also the reason why we tend to give this much attention to the Citi surprise indices: it is the unexpected that moves the markets. Knowing what is expected is therefore a basic starting point from which to see where the biggest risks and surprises may come from.”

Discover the latest insights
Subscribe

A tail risk of more monetary tightening than expected

Economic data has surprised on the upside, showing that growth momentum has improved.
Source: Bloomberg, Robeco.

Reflation is the buzzword

So what does the consensus believe, and how may reality deviate from it? “The optimism is linked to the potential for growth acceleration in the world economy, while the risks are almost entirely linked to the unpredictable nature of the new US President,” Daalder says.

“As for the growth outlook, the central question is whether 2017 will be the year in which the authorities are able to revive the economy, to boost growth, and with it, inflation. ‘Reflation’ is the buzzword, and most agree that there will be a shift from monetary to fiscal stimulus.”

He says the main things to come out from consensus views are:

  • Trump’s plans are generally seen as being positive, with the big caveat that no-one is certain what they will exactly look like. The general assumption is that Trump will let the US deficit expand, with some forecasting that it will rise to 5% of GDP in 2017.
  • The stimulative impact of much of Trump’s plans is likely to be felt in 2018, rather than 2017. Restructuring taxes is not something that can be done overnight, while the impact of infrastructural spending is also something that will take effect later rather than sooner.
  • Outside the US, the outlook is much more uncertain. Some believe that Canada, the UK, Japan and even Europe are also looking to revive their respective economies with new infrastructural spending, but these are not expected to be game-changers.
  • Numerous reports mention the tight labor markets in the US, Japan, the UK and Germany as being a key point for 2017. Higher wages may be coming, which is positive for consumers but can be both inflationary and negative for profit margins.
  • Regarding trade tensions and the retreat from globalization, most reports are remarkably sanguine: ‘Prohibitive tariffs but no trade wars’ and ‘sensibility will prevail’ appears to be the general feeling here.

For growth expectations, Daalder says the picture is mixed. “The consensus has the highest relative expectations for Japan, with most forecasting growth in excess of the average growth realization of the past three years,” he says. “Having said that, that average is pretty low (0.8%), which makes it an easy target to break.”

“The picture for the US is pretty mixed, with the average expected growth rate (2.1%) actually slightly below the realization growth rate (2.2%). Interestingly, even those who appear to be pretty upbeat with respect to the Trump plans shy away from putting it into a higher growth estimate. As for Europe, the consensus is unanimously cautious, with no-one forecasting growth in excess of 1.5%.”

Reflation vs growth

When compared with estimates for inflation, the overall outlook is less clear, Daalder says. The consensus currently predicts 2.3% for the US and 1.3% for the Eurozone. “Although some of the reports are pretty upbeat on the prospects for reflation taking place in 2017 (especially for the US), this has so far failed to lead to a more optimistic growth outlook,” he says.

“All in all, there appears to be a bigger belief in the return of inflation than there is in the return of growth. Although this supports the developments that we have seen in the bond markets, there appears to be something of a mismatch between what stock markets have done and the consensus growth numbers.”

“Either stocks have already overshot their mark, or the top-down consensus is still pretty conservative with respect to growth expectations. A bigger risk seems to be the clear lack of attention that is being given to the potential negative impact of de-globalization: the assumption that common sense will prevail is one that we find hard, given the character of Trump.”

The fate of equities is linked to earnings

Daalder says another recurring message is that the outlook for stocks will crucially depend on corporate earnings for the year to come, after hitting records at the end of 2016.

“Numerous reports have made the observation that the mismatch between earnings growth, which have been mostly negative across the globe in recent years, and equity returns, which have been mostly positive, has meant that stocks have become more expensive in PE terms (the so-called multiple expansion).”

“Looking at the MSCI World Index for example, reported earnings per share have declined by 3% over the last six years, while the index itself has risen by 37%. Corporate earnings are therefore deemed to be of crucial importance for this market to move higher.”