Disclaimer

The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).

The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.

By clicking Proceed I confirm that I am a professional investor and/or institutional investor and that I have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

Decline
Low Volatility in historical perspective: Fund investing since 1774

Low Volatility in historical perspective: Fund investing since 1774

21-09-2016 | Research

As portfolio managers of Robeco Conservative Equities, we want to place our role into a historical perspective and learn from the history of financial markets, and mutual funds in particular. History teaches us that good ideas do not necessarily guarantee successful funds. Timing is everything. Still, capital protection, high income and low turnover are timeless factors that are still relevant today.

  • Jan Sytze  Mosselaar
    Jan Sytze
    Mosselaar
    Sr Portfolio Manager Quantitative Equities
  • Pim  van Vliet
    Pim
    van Vliet
    Managing Director Conservative Equities - Pim van Vliet

Speed read

  • A brilliant investment idea is not enough: timing is very important as well
  • The modern era’s focus on relative performance is a root cause of the low-risk anomaly
  • Centuries-old, prudent investment virtues are very significant today

Studying history, we identify three periods that characterize our industry: pre-modern, modern, and post-modern.

The first, pre-modern era is a rather long period which started in 1774 and ended around the late 1950s. As with many innovations, it is debatable exactly when the first mutual fund in history was introduced. In the 1770s, investment vehicles with all the characteristics of a mutual fund were created in what was the global financial center of the 18th century, Amsterdam.

Discover the latest insights
Subscribe

The first mutual fund: surprisingly modern objectives

We will take a closer look at a financial innovator and probably the first value manager in the world. Abraham van Ketwich owned one of the many brokerage offices in the city. Many of his clients invested in the English East India Company and lost a great amount of money. The prospects of this company were greatly exaggerated, leading to a stock market crash and credit crunch in Amsterdam and London in 1772/1773.

Van Ketwich came up with the idea of offering a diversified fund of bonds that would mitigate the investment risk for small investors. He named his fund Eendragt Maakt Magt (unity makes strength). The prospectus of the fund, called a Negotiatie, clearly outlined the investment strategy:

  • The fund would consist of several share classes and would invest in ten different categories of securities, 50 in total, which were all listed in the prospectus. The categories included government bonds from Russia, Sweden and Denmark, as well as bonds securitizing Danish and Spanish toll revenues, but the fund focused mainly on Caribbean plantation loans, the predecessors of mortgage-backed securities.
  • Dutch government bonds were not included, as their perceived low risk was felt not to require diversification. Equity investments were deemed to be too risky and were excluded from the investment universe.
  • The fund wasn’t supposed to trade much – something which was safeguarded by a strict separation between the investment manager and the broker, Van Ketwich, who handled the trades.
  • The starting point was to equally weight the investments to ensure the benefits of diversification.
  • The fund would pay an annual dividend of 4%.
  • The fund would be terminated after 25 years.

Later on, Ketwich introduced two other funds. Neither of the three funds were a big success though. Ketwich was too early and his investment funds suffered serious headwinds. A few years after the launch of these funds, the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War broke out in 1780. Investors’ sentiment deteriorated and the Caribbean plantation loans suffered as colonial goods could not be shipped back to Holland. In 1795, the situation worsened as the Dutch Republic went to war with France and as a result the Dutch Caribbean colonies were confiscated by the British. The Dutch economic hegemony, already in decline, was now over; London took over from Amsterdam as the financial center of the world.

Eendragt maakt Magt was eventually liquidated in 1824. The other two funds did not fare much better. Van Ketwich’s idea of a diversified investment vehicle for the small investor was brilliant, but his timing was unfortunate given the unforeseen macroeconomic events in the years after his funds were launched. As investors know: timing is everything. You need to be patient in life and when investing, but history shows that in the case of Abraham van Ketwich, even a century is sometimes not long enough…

The objectives of the first funds look surprisingly relevant for investors today. Then too, the focus was on classical investment objectives that benefit clients such as stable returns, high income and low turnover.

The modern period: focus on outperformance

The second investment era, the modern period, starts in the swinging sixties, when the first modern mutual funds as we know them today started to appear. Not only did the industry grow rapidly, the investment focus also shifted from conservatism to outperformance and we saw the rise of ‘star managers’. We consider this to focus on relative performance to be a root cause of the low-risk anomaly.

At the same time, influential capital-market models were developed by academics, leading to the rise of market-weighted indices which became common benchmarks. These developments were all supported by the increase in computational power. Early attempts to build a low-beta fund in the 1970s were unsuccessful.

Respect age-old investment virtues

As portfolio managers of Conservative Equities we look at Abraham van Ketwich with a combination of admiration and envy – the former for his financial innovations, the latter because he had no peer group pressure or benchmark to beat. Above all, his story also keeps us humble. His fund, brilliant as it was, eventually did not succeed. We appreciate his focus on the original virtues of mutual fund investing: capital protection, income and low turnover. In an industry obsessed with short-term relative performance and high turnover, we want to preserve, promote and live these age-old investment virtues.

Leave your details and download the report

This report is not available for users from countries where the offering of foreign financial services is not permitted, such as US citizens and residents.