

Who owns (un)sustainable companies?
Robeco has a long track record of investing sustainably. In many strategies, we prioritize investments in sustainable companies and avoid investing in unsustainable ones. This begs the question: Who does invest in unsustainable companies, and why?
Summary
- SI initiatives surprisingly have little influence on unsustainable ownership
- External pressure can induce lower ownership of poor scoring companies
- Country of origin and support levels for the SDGs are major determinants
The question is examined in a new research paper entitled ‘Who Owns (Un)Sustainable Companies? Examining Institutional Determinants of Sustainable Investing’ published in the Journal of Cleaner Production.
The paper shows that investors widely vary in their ownership of unsustainable and sustainable companies. Some investors have large allocations to sustainable ones, while others own much more of the unsustainable firms. The paper then investigates whether various SI drivers lead to higher equity ownership of sustainable companies, and lower ownership of unsustainable ones.
The findings reveal firstly that SI initiatives, like the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) and Net Zero alliances, have little influence on their signatories’ ownership of (un)sustainable companies. Surprisingly, investors that are committed to such initiatives invest more in unsustainable companies. This raises questions about the effectiveness of SI initiatives in redirecting financing away from unsustainable firms.
Secondly, the findings suggest that external pressure can induce investors to reduce their ownership of unsustainable companies. Investors that face high normative pressure, like sovereign wealth funds that must follow their governments’ leads, or pension funds that are questioned by their beneficiaries over sustainability performance, invest less in unsustainable companies than investors with few constraints, such as hedge funds.
Role of the SDGs
Thirdly, SI behavior correlates with the respective country of origin. Investors from civil law systems invest less in unsustainable companies than those from common law backgrounds. Additionally, investors from countries that are more committed to the SDGs have lower ownership of unsustainable companies. In turn, investors from nations that are less committed to the SDGs have higher ownership of sustainable companies.
Investors from countries closer to achieving the SDGs also invest more in sustainable firms, while those far from reaching these goals invest more in unsustainable companies. Furthermore, green central banking policies in a country do not impact ownership of sustainable or unsustainable companies.
Keep up with the latest sustainable insights
Join our newsletter to explore the trends shaping SI.
Multiple dimensions for samples
This information was gleaned by creating samples of sustainable, unsustainable and neutral companies. These samples were built using multiple dimensions, including the Robeco SDG score, an assessment of asset owners’ exclusion lists, holdings in sustainable thematic funds, performance on the EU Taxonomy, and companies’ annual greenhouse gas emissions.
Data on these companies and their main equity owners was collected and regression models were developed to understand why investors invest more or less in (un)sustainable companies relative to neutral firms.
Understanding allocations
“The results encourage sustainable investing initiatives to develop accountability mechanisms that induce their signatories to invest more sustainably. They also suggest that increased normative pressure can help shift capital away from unsustainable activities,” says Jan Anton van Zanten, SDG specialist at Robeco and lead researcher for the paper.
“And they indicate that home-country contexts moderate the extent to which investors allocate to (un)sustainable companies. Overall, the findings encourage a critical examination of institutional efficacy in promoting sustainable investing.”
Important information
THIS WEBSITE IS SOLELY INTENDED FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS, WHICH HAS THE MEANING ASCRIBED TO IT IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) AND ITS SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION. Investment involves risks. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The information contained in this website is provided for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell in any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Investors should not base their investment decisions solely on the information provided on this website and are advised to seek independent advice (including advice on tax implications) before making any investment decisions. Investors should ensure they fully understand the risks associated with the investment products and should also consider their own investment objectives and risk tolerance level. The investment decision is yours. You should not invest unless the intermediary who sells you the investment products has advised you that it is suitable for you and has explained how it is consistent with your investment objectives. Please refer to the relevant offering documents or other legal documents for further details including the risk factors. This website is published by Robeco Hong Kong Limited which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) (CE No. APU851). This website has not been reviewed by the SFC. No assurance can be given that the investment objective of any investment products will be achieved. No representation or promise as to the performance of any investment products or the return on an investment is made. The value of investments may fluctuate. Past performance, projections, or forecasts included in this website should not be regarded as guarantees or indications of future performance, and no express or implied warranty is provided. The contents of this website are based on sources believed to be reliable, but due to the nature of information delivery technology and the necessity of using multiple data sources, including third party content, their accuracy is not guaranteed. The opinions expressed are as of the date shown above and may change as market conditions evolve, and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Robeco investment professionals. Robeco accepts no liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential loss arising from the use of this material or any comments, opinions, or estimates contained herein. Robeco has no duty to update this website or any website content. Materials on this website may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without prior written permission from Robeco. Unless otherwise specified, Source: Robeco.


























