switzerlanden
SI Opener: Covid-19 puts spotlight on labor issues in the apparel industry

SI Opener: Covid-19 puts spotlight on labor issues in the apparel industry

26-11-2020 | SI Opener
The fashion industry has been severely affected by the Covid-19 pandemic due to its discretionary nature, impacting not only garment brands but also their supply chains. The average market capitalization of the sector dropped almost 40% in the first quarter of this year, a much steeper decline than that of the overall stock market. This epidemic has shifted investor focus on how companies treat their employees, customers and suppliers. 1
  • Masja Zandbergen - Albers
    Masja
    Zandbergen - Albers
    Head of sustainability integration
  • Laura Bosch Ferreté
    Laura
    Bosch Ferreté
    Engagement specialist

Speed read

  • Several manufacturers weren’t paid for orders in production or finalized
  • Engagement seeks to highlight labor standards in supply chain management
  • Challenges include data availability and building long-term supplier relationships

Impact of Covid-19 from an investment perspective

In our investment research, we focus on addressing the most material issues for each industry. For apparel, we find that labor practices and supply chain management are two of the six most material issues.

The magnitude of impact versus its likelihood in the garment industry. Source: Robeco SI Research

Companies in the apparel and textiles sector may operate and control their manufacturing plants themselves, though they often partly outsource this responsibility to their supplier network. Those operating their own plants have a direct responsibility to provide a safe place to work and commit to respecting labor and human rights.

When manufacturing is outsourced, companies will typically find suppliers in countries with the lowest direct cost, which also have limited regulation and enforced worker protection. Suppliers are often dependent on the contracting apparel company and have to adapt to price pressure – both are factors that increase the risk of a deterioration in labor conditions. Wages paid to supply chain workers are often well below living wage estimates and far too often put them on the poverty line.

In order to create resilient and competitive supply chains, manufacturers of apparel, accessories, luxury goods, footwear and textiles need to balance commercial imperatives such as quality, costs and delivery time with broader issues (like the environmental impact, social considerations and business practices). Companies that implement policies effectively can significantly reduce their reputational and operational risks and potential regulatory scrutiny.

Companies with transparent supply chains will strengthen their social license to operate and boost their brand image. Carrying out effective due diligence across the supply chain is crucial to identifying high risk areas where labor-related issues might arise. This assessment should be followed by concrete actions to prevent and mitigate these issues, including a consistent measurement of the effectiveness of these actions.

Stay informed on Sustainable Investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Sustainable Investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Impact of Covid-19 from a social perspective

Several apparel brands and retailers cancelled or postponed orders as the pandemic forced store closures globally and revenue streams shrunk drastically. Factories in producing countries face major challenges to keep their businesses running whilst experiencing a decline in the volume of orders. In Bangladesh, the second-largest exporter of garments in the world, manufacturers lost more than EUR 2.7 billion in payments for orders that had already been produced or sourced.

Workers in low-cost manufacturing countries have been hit the hardest, given the lack of robust social protection systems in these markets. They are more exposed to sudden job termination, lack of severance pay, and inadequate social security and health insurance.

Addressing these challenges through engagement

Our engagement work in the garment industry is conducted in collaboration with other financial institutions through the Platform Living Wage Financials (PLWF).2 The platform is an alliance of 15 mostly Dutch financial institutions with EUR 2.6 trillion in assets under management that aims to improve conditions in the clothing manufacturing sector, which is heavily reliant on low-paid workers. This platform has been in existence for a few years now, and has proved its worth in the pandemic.

For example, in the first half of the year, we sent a letter to our investee companies requesting that they manage the Covid-19 crisis responsibly across their supply chains. Our key asks focused on seeking financial prudence, securing appropriate health and safety for all employees, and protecting workers’ rights across the supply chain. We encouraged our investee companies to get involved in industry-wide multi-stakeholder initiatives to find solutions to these challenges.

Furthermore, the International Labor Organization has put forward a ‘Call to Action in the Garment Sector’.3 Global brands, manufacturers, labor unions and other stakeholders can publicly endorse this statement, which aims to catalyse action to enable manufacturers to survive the economic disruption caused by the pandemic, and to protect garment workers’ income, health and employment. The PLWF has publicly endorsed this initiative, together with more than 100 stakeholders.

Key takeaways from our annual living wage assessment

One of the key components of our engagement work through the PLWF consists in the annual assessment of how our investee companies accelerate the payment of living wages across their supply chains. The members of the Garment and Footwear working group, which is chaired by Robeco, have concluded the assessment of 29 companies and publicly reported the results on this webpage.

Our results show that there is overall progress in embedding the relevance of living wages within the industry. The principal challenge is how to close the gap between commitments that are being put forward by brands, and the actual actions taking place on the ground. Despite widespread acceptance of the need to raise living wages, none of the companies assessed had sufficient processes in place to guarantee the full payment of living wages across its own operations and supply chain.

The research and the information gleaned from engagement on labor and supply chain issues are integrated into our in investment decision-making process for the apparel and retail sectors, as these are considered material issues.

One example is the case of a large DIY retailer. Our discussion about labor practices across the company’s operations was important for the portfolio manager of the RobecoSAM gender equality fund. Covid-19 had a positive impact on the company’s sales, which increased significantly due to people spending more time doing improvement work on their houses. However, the company has a very large base of employees working in its stores, including many migrant workers and female employees, with high turnover rates. We discussed with the company how it manages its workforce so as to ensure equal opportunities for employees across different job levels – an important component of the RobecoSAM gender equality score.

Another example is our engagement with two apparel companies which are important holdings for our consumer trends funds. Both companies embody best practices in their business segments (sportswear/luxury), so this led to positive comments in the ESG integration component of the investment case, positively adding to the rationale for holding these companies in the portfolio.

Companies need to move from commitment to actual improvements

Although we are seeing an increasing commitment from the sector to solve these issues, there is still work to be done in implementation. Several challenges need to be addressed when it comes to apparel supply chains and paying a living wage. First of all, there is a need to improve data availability so that companies are better able to understand what are the wage levels being paid by suppliers, and how that compares to living wage benchmarks.

Furthermore, it is important that brands commit to more sustainable practices by building long-term supplier relationships, which will enable them to better account for the labor cost in their procurement work. There should also be a social dialogue to ensure freedom of association and collective bargaining agreements as tools to really drive wage improvements. This goes back to the importance of industry-wide collaborations with not only brands, manufacturers and workers, but also with governments and other stakeholders who can collectively contribute to accelerate the systemic change that is needed in the industry.

Lastly, there is a need to bring the rest of the garments industry on board. Legislative changes on mandatory human rights due diligence can really contribute to building a more resilient supply chain at the end of the day. We see some promising signs with lawmakers in the Netherlands who are preparing to bring such a proposal before the Dutch parliament, and hope that other countries will follow suit.

1 McKinsey: The state of fashion 2020: Coronavirus update
2 For more about the Platform Living Wage Financials, go to https://www.livingwage.nl/
3https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/coronavirus/sectoral/WCMS_742343/lang--en/index.htm

SI Opener
SI Opener
Seeing is believing.
Read all articles
Logo

Disclaimer Robeco Switzerland Ltd.

The information contained on these pages is for marketing purposes and solely intended for Qualified Investors in accordance with the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006 (“CISA”) domiciled in Switzerland, Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients. 

The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent. The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website www.robeco.ch. Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 26 June 2006 (“CISA”) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). 

Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the RobecoSwitzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile. 

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports. 

By clicking “I agree” you confirm that you/the company you represent falls under one of the above-mentioned categories of addressees and that you have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

I Disagree