Professor of philanthropy and sustainable finance at Maastricht University
“When I talk about social preferences and sustainability, I always refer to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. These cover different aspects ranging from climate action, decent work conditions and economic growth to clean water and gender equality. So, for me that’s how I look at sustainability in general.”
“And what my co-author and I found1 is that the expectance of better fund performance or lower risk is not the main motivation for individual investors to buy sustainable funds. Really, it’s because they want to make a difference. They want to have positive impact on the environment, they want to have a positive impact in terms of human rights.”
“And these considerations seem to be by far the most important in the decision-making process. Meanwhile, in the industry, financial professionals tend to focus first on risk and return. Of course, risk and return are important, but what our study shows is that they are not the main driver for people to buy a sustainable fund.”
Risk and return are important, but our study shows they are not the main driver
“Think about it. A solar panel on your roof or a hybrid car: these things bring reputational benefits. Other people can see the panel on your roof or that you’re driving a hybrid car. The same applies to investment funds. We analyzed how much people talk about their investments and found that those who talk the most are more likely to buy sustainable funds, because they get reputational benefits from it.”
“Oh, absolutely. People always like to see themselves and to be seen by others as good individuals. Just look at all the names of important donors on university buildings in the US. And our research shows that this is also true concerning the holdings of individual investors. Individuals do not want to be seen as somebody who invests in weapons or tobacco.”
“We found that when people expect lower returns, they are slightly less likely to buy sustainable funds. Yet we also found that the ‘pro-social’ nature of people – something we assessed in a small experiment that tested how much money individuals tend to share – turns out to be a much stronger predictor of the likelihood that people will invest in a sustainable fund than financial expectations. So, both aspects matter, but the social aspect is simply stronger than the financial one.”
“Let me give a clear example. Today, many investors avoid cigarette makers and, as a result, the price of tobacco stocks has gone down. This explains why these stocks now perform better, because while stock prices are lower, the dividends have remained the same. I think this will happen more and more as the number of sustainable investors increases further.”
“In the case of tobacco, many institutional investors actually have similar exclusion policies. And we saw something similar with Saudi Aramco’s IPO. The Saudi government did not get the high issue price they wanted because many investors eventually thought, ‘Wait a minute. I don’t want to own a company that has a very poor record in terms of human rights and climate change.’”
“In the short run, the more sustainable stocks could outperform as asset managers put more emphasis on sustainability and investors buy more sustainable stocks. This would drive up the price of the stocks and result in a higher return. So, there might be a temporary mispricing of sustainable stocks. Those that come to the party early could benefit from this, but those that arrive late might be at risk.”
“In the long run, however, if there is more demand for sustainable stocks, we could see lower returns. Investors would then have to buy sustainable stocks at a higher price. But these might also come with lower risk, as some empirical evidence shows that taking sustainability into account helps reduce risk. Remember Bank of England Governor Mark Carney’s famous warning about risks related to climate change for institutions?2 ”
“Having said that, we have to bear in mind that there’s not enough consensus on what sustainability means and how it should be measured. This makes it hard to draw robust conclusions about its impact on asset prices. Take sustainability ratings, for example: some providers focus only on products, while others also consider production processes.”
“True, the number of investors who hold sustainable funds is relatively large in the Netherlands. Yet, there is nothing special about the preferences of Dutch individuals compared to those of, say, Germans or Spaniards. The Dutch rank average. So, the differences you mention have more to do with supply issues. It’s not that in some countries clients don't care about contributing to a better world.”
The main reason why people don’t invest sustainably is simply because they have never thought about it
“Actually, the main reason why people don’t invest sustainably is simply because they have never thought about it. That is why the European Commission will soon make it mandatory for financial institutions to ask their clients about sustainability, just like they ask about risk tolerance. So, there’s a lot of potential for developing sustainable investments.”
1 Riedl, A. and Smeets, P., 2017, ‘Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?’, Journal of Finance.
2 Carney, M., 2015, ‘Breaking the tragedy of the horizon – climate change and financial stability’ Speech at Lloyd’s of London, London.
The information contained on these pages is for marketing purposes and solely intended for Qualified Investors in accordance with the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006 (“CISA”) domiciled in Switzerland, Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients.
The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent. The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website www.robeco.ch. Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 26 June 2006 (“CISA”) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).
Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the RobecoSwitzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports.