Important legal information

The content displayed on this website is exclusively directed at qualified investors, as defined in the swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 june 2006 ("cisa") and its implementing ordinance, or at “independent asset managers” which meet additional requirements as set out below. Qualified investors are in particular regulated financial intermediaries such as banks, securities dealers, fund management companies and asset managers of collective investment schemes and central banks, regulated insurance companies, public entities and retirement benefits institutions with professional treasury or companies with professional treasury.

The contents, however, are not intended for non-qualified investors. By clicking "I agree" below, you confirm and acknowledge that you act in your capacity as qualified investor pursuant to CISA or as an “independent asset manager” who meets the additional requirements set out hereafter. In the event that you are an "independent asset manager" who meets all the requirements set out in Art. 3 para. 2 let. c) CISA in conjunction with Art. 3 CISO, by clicking "I Agree" below you confirm that you will use the content of this website only for those of your clients which are qualified investors pursuant to CISA.

Representative in Switzerland of the foreign funds registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") for distribution in or from Switzerland to non-qualified investors is Robeco Switzerland AG, Josefstrasse 218, 8005 Zürich, and the paying agent is UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich. Please consult www.finma.ch for a list of FINMA registered funds.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco/Robeco Switzerland product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, articles of association, prospectuses, key investor information documents and annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website, at the registered seat of the representative in Switzerland, as well as at the Robeco/Robeco Switzerland offices in each country where Robeco has a presence. In respect of the funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the representative in Switzerland.

This website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, the publication or availability of this website is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this website.

I Disagree
Brexit negotiations will go to the brink

Brexit negotiations will go to the brink

09-11-2017 | Yearly outlook
The Brexit saga continues, but the UK surely cannot want to crash out of the EU empty-handed.
  • Léon  Cornelissen
    Léon
    Cornelissen
    Chief Economist

“No deal is better than a bad deal” is the mantra that the UK government keeps repeating, probably for negotiating purposes. However, in economic terms, “no deal” would be highly detrimental.

First of all, the absence of a deal does not automatically mean the UK can trade with the EU on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms. To be able to do this, a great many deals on new administrative procedures governing certification of regulatory standards, customs processes and so forth will be required.

The agreements must be reached well before Friday 29 March 2019. In fact, it is hard to see how trade can continue if these deals are not made by the summer of 2018. The problem is that so far, the UK has done nothing, nothing at all, to prepare itself for a ‘hard’ Brexit. No arrangements have been made with regard to customs, new agencies or residency rights.

Moreover, even if it were possible to trade on WTO terms almost immediately after leaving, a recent World Bank study suggests that trade in goods with the EU would halve, and trade in services would fall 60%. It would be highly irresponsible not to make a deal and therefore unlikely. So “no deal” is nothing more than an empty threat. The recent US Bombardier tariffs are a reminder that life is cold outside the largest internal market in the world.

Investment outlook 2018
Investment outlook 2018

Would you like to read the full report 'Playing in extra time'?

Download full publication
Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream / Fathom Consulting

In the meantime, the clock is ticking. The EU is demanding sufficient progress on three issues: the size of the divorce bill, the citizens' rights for EU-27 citizens in the UK and UK citizens in the EU-27, and the future of the current, ultra-soft border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, before negotiations on future trading relations can start. As the UK government intends to leave both the customs union and the internal market, solving the Irish border problem looks a lot like an attempt to square the circle.

Furthermore, the UK government is in no hurry to settle the divorce bill, as it is one of the few trump cards in its hands. What we can expect is that businesses will start to panic more and more, the longer it takes to conclude a preliminary deal. At some point, the UK government will probably surrender to the fact that “no deal” is not a viable option. Nobody is under the illusion that the upcoming negotiations on the future trade relationship between the UK and the EU will be finished quickly.

In the meantime, the transitional relationship will be more or less the same as it is now: the UK will still be subject to new EU rules and to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, and will still contribute to the EU budget, etc. In Florence, Prime Minister Theresa May indicated the transitional period would last for two years. However, it is doubtful that will be long enough. The negotiations regarding the recent EU/Canada deal, for instance, took seven years to complete.

Initially, the Brexit saga will continue to be a substantial drag on the economy. Only if the UK ends up remaining a de facto member of the EU for the years to come, will the drag subside. An additional benefit would be that the Irish border could remain soft for the foreseeable future.

This article forms part of the Robeco 2018 outlook entitled Playing in Extra Time.

Are there risks? Of course, there always are. One might be that a new and improved Fed will prove more hawkish than it is now. No fewer than three FOMC monetary policy committee positions are currently vacant, with Chair Janet Yellen’s term ending in February 2018. The latest rumors have it that QE critic John Taylor is now the preferred candidate to replace her, but if we have learned anything from this administration, it’s that the rumors cannot be trusted. In general, monetary policy is decided by majority vote, which makes any radical change unlikely.

What’s more, the fact that inflationary developments continue to be favorable mean there is little reason as yet to implement monetary tightening in 2018, at a point no more than two steps after the modest rate hike of December 2017.

Another risk specific to the US, is that the threat of impeachment could dampen ‘animal spirits’. This risk will likely only become critical after the 2018 Congressional elections, if the Republicans lose their majority in the House of Representatives. In that sense, the main risk to the growth outlook is the rise of protectionism as illustrated by the difficult negotiations surrounding NAFTA.

All in all, in 2018, US economic growth could easily surprise on the upside.

This article forms part of the Robeco 2018 outlook entitled Playing in Extra Time.

Investment outlook 2018
Investment outlook 2018

Playing in extra time

Read all articles
Subjects related to this article are: