RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds IEH GBP
- Uses a proprietary SDG measurement framework to select companies that contribute positively to the SDGs, excludes those that do the opposite.
- Managed with a conservative approach by an experienced team
- Disciplined and repeatable investment process
About this fund
Price development
Performance
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.date,'llll') ]}}| Fund | Index | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | ||
| 3 months | ||
| YTD | ||
| 1 year | ||
| 2 years | ||
| 3 years | ||
| 5 years | ||
| 10 years | ||
| {{'fund.detail.performance.period.sinceInception' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.sinceStart.startDate,'MM-YYYY') ]}} |
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
Performance explanation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was 0.43%. The fund outperformed its benchmark by almost 50 bps in July, thus markedly reducing the year-to-date underperformance. This underperformance stems almost exclusively from our beta underweight, as we retain a clear quality bias. Issuer selection results are now almost neutral on a year-to-date basis, after a very strong July. The main contributor to the outperformance was our conservative stance towards Chinese property developers, of which there are quite a few in the index. Evergrande, the largest, is in deep financial trouble, and bonds dropped to around 40. Evergrande is highly leveraged, and uses aggressive financing policies to acquire land and develop properties. China recently tightened regulation on funding, bringing Evergrande in acute liquidity difficulties. Other Chinese developers are in the same situation. Not owning these companies added 30 bps of outperformance in July. Other laggards on a sector basis in July were energy, communications and transportation, in which we are underweight. This added to the relative performance. Hospital operator HCA, a large holding, performed strongly on yet another ratings upgrade.
Statistics
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate( (fund.fundStatistics.date?fund.fundStatistics.date:fund.fundCharacteristics.date) ,'llll') ]}}| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tracking error ex-post (%) |
|
||
| Information ratio | |||
| Sharpe ratio | |||
| Alpha (%) | |||
| Beta |
|
||
| Standard deviation |
|
||
| Max. monthly gain (%) |
|
||
| Max. monthly loss (%) |
|
| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Months outperformance | |||
| Hit ratio (%) | |||
| Months Bull market | |||
| Months outperformance Bull | |||
| Hit ratio Bull (%) | |||
| Months Bear market | |||
| Months outperformance Bear | |||
| Hit ratio Bear (%) |
| Fund | Reference index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||
| Option Adjusted Modified Duration (years) | |||
| Maturity (years) | |||
| Yield to Worst (%) | |||
| Green Bonds (%) |
Dividend paying history
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Date | Amount |
|---|---|
Market development
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}High yield bond markets managed to generate another positive total return, for the ninth month in a row. For July, the return driver was the underlying decline in government bond yields. High yield spreads actually widened over the month, resulting in a small negative credit excess return. Since the start of 2021, spreads declined by about 50-60 bps, resulting in more than 400 bps of credit excess return over treasuries. USD HY underperformed EUR HY in July by a small margin, but has performed much better on a YTD basis.The big theme in July was the move in treasury yields. The 10-year US Treasury yield declined further, from 1.45% to 1.22%. With all-in yield levels of close to 4% in the US and approaching 3% in Europe, borrowing for high yield-rated companies has never been this cheap. Unsurprisingly, primary activity remains very busy. July was once again a record-breaking month. After only seven months, US HY issuance is already higher than in all but four full calendar years we have had so far. With such easy access to capital, defaults remain scarce. In the past month, not a single default was recorded. The default rate is approaching 1%, way below the long-term average of 3.5-4.0%.
Fund allocation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundAllocations.date,'llll') ]}}| Name | Sector | Weight |
|---|---|---|
Currency policy
All currency risks are hedged.
Derivative policy
RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds make use of derivatives for hedging purposes as well as for investment purposes. These derivatives are liquid.
Dividend policy
In principle, the fund will distribute dividend annually.
ESG Integration policy
In the RobecoSAM SDG High Yield strategy we look for investments with a positive societal impact, whilst generating healthy financial returns. We define impact as an alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We identify and evaluate the impact that specific credits have on the SDGs, and score all the issuers under coverage of the analyst team. These scores categorize credits as having either a Positive, Neutral, or Negative impact on the SDGs. The scores are then used in a screening process, to define the investable universe that exclude credits with a Negative impact on the SDGs. In addition to the universe screening, our credit analysts integrate ESG factors in their analysis of the companies fundamental credit quality.
Investment policy
RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds is an actively managed fond that invests in global corporate bonds. The selection of these bonds is based on fundamental analysis. The fund's objective is to provide long term capital growth.The fund has sustainable investment as its objective within the meaning of Article 9 of the European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. The fund advances the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by investing in companies whose business models and operational practices are aligned with targets defined by the 17 UN SDGs. The fund integrates ESG (Environmental, Social and corporate Governance) in the investment process, applies an exclusion list basis controversial behavior, products (including controversial weapons, tobacco, palm oil and fossil fuel) while avoiding investment in thermal coal, weapons, military contracting and companies that severely violate labor conditions, next to engagement. The funds invests in high yield corporate bonds with a sub-investment grade rating, with a structural bias to the higher rated part in high yield. The portfolio is built on the basis of the eligible investment universe and the relevant SDGs using an internally developed framework about which more information can be obtained via the website www.robeco.com/si. The majority of bonds selected will be components of the Benchmark, but bonds outside the Benchmark may be selected too. The fund can deviate substantially from the weightings of the Benchmark. The fund aims to outperform the Benchmark over the long run, whilst still controlling relative risk through the applications of limits (on currencies and issuers) to the extent of deviation from the Benchmark. This will consequently limit the deviation of the performance relative to the Benchmark. The Benchmark is a broad market weighted index that is not consistent with the sustainable objective of the fund.
Risk policy
Risk management is fully embedded in the investment process to ensure that positions always meet predefined guidelines.
Sustainability profile
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}
SDG Contribution
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}The SDG score shows to what extent the portfolio and the benchmark contribute to the 17 UN Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs). Scores are assigned to each underlying company using the Robeco SDG Framework, which utilizes a three-step approach to calculate a company’s contribution to the relevant SDGs. The starting point is an assessment of the products offered by a company, followed by the way in which these products are produced, and finally whether the company is exposed to any controversies. The outcome is expressed in a final score which shows the extent to which a company impacts the SDGs on a scale from highly negative (dark red) to highly positive (dark blue). The bar shows the aggregate percentage exposure of the portfolio and the benchmark (shaded) to the different SDG scores. This is then also split out per SDG. As a company can have an impact on several SDGs (or none), the values shown in the report do not sum to 100%. More information on Robeco’s SDG Framework can be found at: https://www.robeco.com/docm/docu-robeco-explanation-sdg-framework.pdf
ESG integration policy
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}In the RobecoSAM SDG High Yield strategy we look for investments with a positive societal impact, whilst generating healthy financial returns. We define impact as an alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We identify and evaluate the impact that specific credits have on the SDGs, and score all the issuers under coverage of the analyst team. These scores categorize credits as having either a Positive, Neutral, or Negative impact on the SDGs. The scores are then used in a screening process, to define the investable universe that exclude credits with a Negative impact on the SDGs. In addition to the universe screening, our credit analysts integrate ESG factors in their analysis of the companies fundamental credit quality.
Expectation of fund manager
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}The year 2021 has thus far developed into a full-swing recovery year, with confidence indicators up, GDP on a mega-swing back and year-on-year headline inflation numbers rising sharply, all of which has been helped by extremely loose fiscal and monetary policies. So far, high yield markets have embraced the recovery and ignored any potential warning signs. The risk of overheating the economy and letting inflation slip out of control is there, but markets firmly bet on the narrative of inflation spikes being a transitory year-on-year effect after the sudden stop the economy experienced in 2020. ‘All signs on green’ has become the widely shared view for credit. This is a market that no longer compensates for tail risks and which is vulnerable to negative surprises. Confirmation biases rule. At times like these, it is best to be humble about the unknowns and to just accept that, every now and then, it is difficult to see the forest for the trees.We are staying firmly on the cautious side, with a preference for quality names and clear survivors. Given the very low dispersion in markets, it does not pay to reach out for the riskier names. We are running an underweight beta as a result.
Sander Bus, Christiaan Lever
Sander Bus is Co-Head of the Credit team and Lead Portfolio Manager Global High Yield Bonds. He has been dedicated to High Yield at Robeco since 1998. Previously, Sander worked for two years as a Fixed Income Analyst at Rabobank where he started his career in the industry in 1996. He holds a Master's in Financial Economics from Erasmus University Rotterdam and is a CFA® charterholder. Christiaan Lever is Portfolio Manager High Yield in the Credit team. Before assuming this role in 2016, he was Financial Risk Manager at Robeco, focusing on market risk, counterparty risk and liquidity risk within fixed Income markets. Christiaan has been active in the industry since 2010. He holds a Master's in Quantitative Finance and in Econometrics from Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Team
RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts. The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by three dedicated quantitative researchers and four fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.
Details
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Management company | |
| Fund capital | |
| Size of share class | |
| Outstanding shares | |
| ISIN | LU2061804634 |
| Bloomberg | RHYIEHG LX |
| Valoren | 50778565 |
| WKN | |
| Availability | |
| 1st quotation date | 1571702400000 |
| Close financial year | 31-12 |
| Legal status | |
| Tracking error limit (%) | |
| Reference index |
Cost of this fund
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundCosts.managementFees.date,'llll') ]}}Ongoing charges |
|
|---|---|
| This fund deducts ongoing charges of |
| These charges comprise | ||
|---|---|---|
| Management fee | ||
| Service fee | ||
Transaction costs |
|
|---|---|
| The expected transaction costs are |
Performance fee |
|
|---|---|
| This fund may also deduct a performance fee of |
Extra fees
| max entry fee | ||
| Max exit fee | ||
| Max sub fee | ||
| Max switch fee |
Fiscal product treatment
The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.01% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.
Fiscal treatment of investor
Investors who are not subject to (exempt from) Dutch corporate-income tax (e.g. pension funds) are not taxed on the achieved result. Investors who are subject to Dutch corporate-income tax can be taxed for the result achieved on their investment in the fund. Dutch bodies that are subject to corporate-income tax are obligated to declare interest and dividend income, as well as capital gains in their tax return. Investors residing outside the Netherlands are subject to their respective national tax regime applying to foreign investment funds. We advise individual investors to consult their financial or tax adviser about the tax consequences of an investment in this fund in their specific circumstances before deciding to invest in the fund.
