Robeco High Yield Bonds Feeder Fund - zero duration DH EUR
- Managed with a conservative approach
- Disciplined and repeatable investment process
- Experienced team management
About this fund
Price development
Price development
Performance
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.date,'llll') ]}}| Fund | Index | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | ||
| 3 months | ||
| YTD | ||
| 1 year | ||
| 2 years | ||
| 3 years | ||
| 5 years | ||
| 10 years | ||
| {{'fund.detail.performance.period.sinceInception' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.sinceStart.startDate,'MM-YYYY') ]}} |
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
Performance explanation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was 0.40%. The fund underperformed its benchmark by 4 bps in August, thus setting the year-to-date underperformance to roughly -0.45%. The year-to-date underperformance stems from our beta underweight, as we retain a clear quality bias. In August, the beta underweight delivered a small minus. Issuer selection results are positive on a year-to-date basis, and also for the month. USD BB outperformed B and CCC on a risk-adjusted basis. With the uncertainty around global growth comes volatility – this was immediately translated into the oil price, which came down a lot to USD 62 to bounce back towards the USD 70. Energy was therefore one of the stronger sectors in the end. On an issuer level, we lost a bit with our positioning in the Apache Energy structure. We benefit from the recovery in Rayonier (OW, +3 bps) – bonds recovered back to par after trading in the nineties for the year. We also outperformed by not owning SoftBank – the structure underperformed on the back of some negative headlines regarding its equity stakes in Chinese tech companies. We underperformed by being overweight in Lumen Tech (-2 bps), whose bonds moved down a few points due to uncertainty around a potential LBO deal.
Statistics
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate( (fund.fundStatistics.date?fund.fundStatistics.date:fund.fundCharacteristics.date) ,'llll') ]}}| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tracking error ex-post (%) |
|
||
| Information ratio | |||
| Sharpe ratio | |||
| Alpha (%) | |||
| Beta |
|
||
| Standard deviation |
|
||
| Max. monthly gain (%) |
|
||
| Max. monthly loss (%) |
|
| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Months outperformance | |||
| Hit ratio (%) | |||
| Months Bull market | |||
| Months outperformance Bull | |||
| Hit ratio Bull (%) | |||
| Months Bear market | |||
| Months outperformance Bear | |||
| Hit ratio Bear (%) |
| Fund | Reference index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||
| Option Adjusted Modified Duration (years) | |||
| Maturity (years) | |||
| Yield to Worst (%) | |||
| Green Bonds (%) |
Market development
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}In the end, high yield bond markets printed another positive total return month. August was a tale of two halves; during the first two weeks we saw a heavy primary market, as companies tried to print before the summer recess. Growth fears as the Delta variant was causing economies to apply new restrictions, in combination with hawkish comments from Fed officials fueled speculations on tapering announcements and higher yields. However, during the Jackson Hole speech Powell repeated the Fed's earlier policy message – fears about tapering to start sooner evaporated and yields and spreads bounced off their intra-month highs. Spreads keep trading in narrow ranges, despite headlines over rising Covid cases, a withdrawal from Afghanistan and the hurricane season hitting the US with devastating storms. The HY Bond Index provided a 0.42% gain in August, with CCC bonds (+0.50%) performing in line with BB bonds (+0.56%) and single B bonds (+0.42%). HY primary market activity produced its second lightest volume for the year, although August usually is not the strongest month due to the holiday season. For the year, numbers are still strong. Issuance is 20% higher compared to the same period last year.
Fund allocation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundAllocations.date,'llll') ]}}| Name | Sector | Weight |
|---|---|---|
Currency policy
All currency risks are hedged.
Derivative policy
The Feeder Fund uses derivatives to hedge the duration of the Master. The duration hedge will lead to intended performance differences between the Feeder Fund and the Master. Interest rate movements will have a different effect on the Master and the Feeder Fund. .
Dividend policy
The fund does not distribute dividend.
ESG Integration policy
Our analysis of issuers goes beyond the traditional financial factors and includes the issuers’ performance on ESG factors. We deem it essential for a well-informed investment decision to take into account those ESG factors that have the potential to materially impact the financial performance of the issuer. This perfectly matches the basic need to avoid the losers in credit management, as many credit events in the past can be attributed to issues such as poorly designed governance frameworks, environmental issues, or weak health & safety standards. The aim of ESG integration is to improve the risk/return profile of the investments and does not have an impact goal. ESG analysis is fully integrated in the bottom-up security analysis. We have defined key ESG factors per industry, and for every company we analyze how the firm is positioned versus these key ESG factors, and how this impacts the fundamental credit quality.
Investment policy
This actively managed fund is a Feeder Fund and invests at least 85% of its assets in class Z2H shares (hedged to USD) of Robeco Capital Growth Funds SICAV - Robeco High Yield Bonds (“the Master”). The Master invests in corporate bonds with a sub-investment grade rating, issued primarily by US and European issuers.The fund's objective is to provide long term capital growth. Through its investment in the Master, the fund aims for a better sustainability profile compared to the Benchmark by promoting certain ESG (i.e. Environmental, Social and corporate Governance) characteristics within the meaning of Article 8 of the European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation and integrating ESG and sustainability risks in the investment process. In addition, the fund applies an exclusion list on the basis of controversial behavior, products (including controversial weapons, tobacco, palm oil and fossil fuel) and countries, next to engagement. The Feeder Fund uses interest rate derivatives to hedge the interest rate risk of the Master to nearly zero. The duration hedge will lead to intended performance differences as a result of interest rate movements between the Feeder Fund and the Master.The majority of bonds selected will be components of the Benchmark, but bonds outside the Benchmark index may be selected too. The Master Fund can deviate substantially from the weightings of the Benchmark. The Master aims to outperform the Benchmark by taking positions that deviate from the Benchmark. The Master Fund aims to outperform the Benchmark over the long run, whilst still controlling relative risk through the applications of limits (on currencies and issuers) to the extent of deviation from the Benchmark. This will consequently limit the deviation of the performance relative to the Benchmark. The Benchmark is a broad market weighted index that is not consistent with the ESG characteristics promoted by the Master Fund.
Risk policy
Risk management is fully embedded in the investment process to ensure that positions always meet predefined guidelines.
Sustainability profile
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}
ESG integration policy
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}Our analysis of issuers goes beyond the traditional financial factors and includes the issuers’ performance on ESG factors. We deem it essential for a well-informed investment decision to take into account those ESG factors that have the potential to materially impact the financial performance of the issuer. This perfectly matches the basic need to avoid the losers in credit management, as many credit events in the past can be attributed to issues such as poorly designed governance frameworks, environmental issues, or weak health & safety standards. The aim of ESG integration is to improve the risk/return profile of the investments and does not have an impact goal. ESG analysis is fully integrated in the bottom-up security analysis. We have defined key ESG factors per industry, and for every company we analyze how the firm is positioned versus these key ESG factors, and how this impacts the fundamental credit quality.
Expectation of fund manager
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}The year 2021 has thus far developed into a full-swing recovery year, with confidence indicators up, GDP on a mega-swing back and year-on-year headline inflation numbers rising sharply, all of which has been helped by extremely loose fiscal and monetary policies. So far, high yield markets have embraced the recovery and ignored any potential warning signs. The risk of overheating the economy and letting inflation slip out of control is there, but markets firmly bet on the narrative of inflation spikes being a transitory year-on-year effect after the sudden stop the economy experienced in 2020. ‘All signs on green’ has become the widely shared view for credit. This is a market that no longer compensates for tail risks and which is vulnerable to negative surprises. Confirmation biases rule. At times like these, it is best to be humble about the unknowns and to just accept that, every now and then, it is difficult to see the forest for the trees. We are staying firmly on the cautious side, with a preference for quality names and clear survivors. Given the very low dispersion in markets, it does not pay to reach out for the riskier names. We are running an underweight beta as a result.
Sander Bus, Roeland Moraal
Sander Bus is Co-Head of the Credit team and Lead Portfolio Manager Global High Yield Bonds. He has been dedicated to High Yield at Robeco since 1998. Previously, Sander worked for two years as a Fixed Income Analyst at Rabobank where he started his career in the industry in 1996. He holds a Master's in Financial Economics from Erasmus University Rotterdam and is a CFA® charterholder. Mr. Roeland Moraal, Vice President, CEFA, Portfolio Manager. Roeland is a Senior Portfolio Manager High Yield within Robeco's Credit team since January 2004. Before assuming this role, he was portfolio manager in our Rates team for two years and worked as an analyst with the Institute for Research and Investment Services for three years. Roeland Moraal is Lead Portfolio Manager European High Yield in the Credit team. Before assuming this role, he was Portfolio Manager in the Robeco Duration team and worked as an Analyst with the Institute for Research and Investment Services. Roeland started his career in the industry in 1997. He holds a Master's in Applied Mathematics from the University of Twente and a Master’s in Law from Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Team
The Robeco High Yield fund is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts. The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by three dedicated quantitative researchers and four fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.
Details
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Management company | |
| Fund capital | |
| Size of share class | |
| Outstanding shares | |
| ISIN | LU1840770512 |
| Bloomberg | ROHYDHE LX |
| Valoren | 42285682 |
| WKN | A2PP2E |
| Availability | |
| 1st quotation date | 1530144000000 |
| Close financial year | 31-12 |
| Legal status | |
| Tracking error limit (%) | |
| Morningstar |
|
| Reference index |
Cost of this fund
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundCosts.managementFees.date,'llll') ]}}Ongoing charges |
|
|---|---|
| This fund deducts ongoing charges of |
| These charges comprise | ||
|---|---|---|
| Management fee | ||
| Service fee | ||
Transaction costs |
|
|---|---|
| The expected transaction costs are |
Performance fee |
|
|---|---|
| This fund may also deduct a performance fee of |
Extra fees
| max entry fee | ||
| Max exit fee | ||
| Max sub fee | ||
| Max switch fee |
Fiscal product treatment
The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.05% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.
Fiscal treatment of investor
The fiscal consequences of investing in this fund depend on the investor's personal situation. For private investors in the Netherlands real interest and dividend income or capital gains received on their investments are not relevant for tax purposes. Each year investors pay income tax on the value of their net assets as at 1 January if and inasmuch as such net assets exceed the investor’s tax-free allowance. Any amount invested in the fund forms part of the investor's net assets. Private investors who are resident outside the Netherlands will not be taxed in the Netherlands on their investments in the fund. However, such investors may be taxed in their country of residence on any income from an investment in this fund based on the applicable national fiscal laws. Other fiscal rules apply to legal entities or professional investors. We advise investors to consult their financial or tax adviser about the tax consequences of an investment in this fund in their specific circumstances before deciding to invest in the fund.
