Disclaimer

Please read this important information before proceeding further. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information contained on this website.

The information contained in the Website is NOT FOR RETAIL CLIENTS - The information contained in the Website is solely intended for professional investors, defined as investors which (1) qualify as professional clients within the meaning of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), (2) have requested to be treated as professional clients within the meaning of the MiFID or (3) are authorized to receive such information under any other applicable laws. The value of the investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Neither Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. nor any of its affiliates guarantees the performance or the future returns of any investments. If the currency in which the past performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which you reside, then you should be aware that due to exchange rate fluctuations the performance shown may increase or decrease if converted into your local currency.

In the UK, Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (“ROBECO”) only markets its funds to institutional clients and professional investors. Private investors seeking information about ROBECO should visit our corporate website www.robeco.com or contact their financial adviser. ROBECO will not be liable for any damages or losses suffered by private investors accessing these areas.

In the UK, ROBECO Funds has marketing approval for the funds listed on this website, all of which are UCITS funds. ROBECO is authorized by the AFM and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request.

Many of the protections provided by the United Kingdom regulatory framework may not apply to investments in ROBECO Funds, including access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and the Financial Ombudsman Service. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information on this website.

If you are not an institutional client or professional investor you should therefore not proceed. By proceeding please note that we will be treating you as a professional client for regulatory purposes and you agree to be bound by our terms and conditions.

If you do not accept these terms and conditions, as well as the terms of use of the website, please do not continue to use or access any pages on this website.

I Disagree
ESG integration: how to monitor your external manager?

ESG integration: how to monitor your external manager?

28-11-2014 | Insight

While ESG integration seems high on the agenda of many asset owners, implementation remains a challenge when selecting and monitoring external managers. Cécile Churet, Sustainability Investing Client Specialist at RobecoSAM, researched the industry trends and concluded that there is still a long way to go.

Preference for ESG integration

When asked which sustainability investing approach asset owners want their external asset managers to apply, 70% indicated ‘ESG integration’, compared with 50% for screening and 25% for thematic approaches. However, this preference implies two challenges, i.e. identifying asset managers that truly integrate ESG into their investment decisions, and ensuring these aspects are incorporated in mainstream asset manager searches - and are actually implemented as intended. Churet found that while a fair amount is being done at the manager selection stage, less is done in terms of monitoring and ongoing dialogue with asset managers once they are selected.

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Formalization in mandates is lacking

A major challenge appears to be the appointment stage, as few SI-related aspects investigated at the selection stage are translated into formal contractual agreements. Only 6% of asset owners include reporting on portfolios’ SI characteristics in the contract clauses with their asset managers. Feedback from asset owners has been that part of the challenge of formalizing these requirements into legally binding agreements comes from legal advisers who are not convinced about ESG integration.

Is ESG integration truly evaluated?

Similarly, less than 40% use a sustainable investment criterion as a formal component of manager performance evaluation. Two-thirds of asset owners assess managers’ ESG incorporation strategies, but less than half actually assess the quality and coverage of the ESG research used by the asset managers, or meet with their investment staff to review their SI competences.

As asset managers become more sophisticated and consider ESG issues as part of their fundamental analysis, using different sources of data and feeding them into their valuation models and investment decisions, it will become more difficult to isolate the ESG component of the investment process.

A long way to go

In conclusion, while ESG integration seems high on the agenda of PRI signatories, implementation remains a challenge. What’s more, these findings represent the practices of the most committed and most advanced asset owners. For much of the pension fund industry, there is still a long way to go on sustainable investment. Similar findings were observed across the whole PRI signatories’ base.

Subjects related to this article are: