Robeco High Yield Bonds IH USD
- Managed with a conservative approach
- Disciplined and repeatable investment process
- Experienced team management
About this fund
Price development
Performance
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.date,'llll') ]}}| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | ||
| 3m | ||
| YTD | ||
| 1 year | ||
| 2 years | ||
| 3 years | ||
| 5 years | ||
| 10 years | ||
| {{'fund.detail.performance.period.sinceInception' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.sinceStart.startDate,'MM-YYYY') ]}} |
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
Performance explanation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was -1.12%. The Global High Yield Index printed the weakest month of the year. The fund outperformed its index on a gross performance basis. This was driven by our underweight beta and October’s negative excess returns. Furthermore, European HY outperformed US HY for the month, although for the year US HY is still the only asset class with a positive excess return. Our quality bias contributed flattish as BBs, Bs and CCCs all performed in line on a risk-adjusted basis. There was not much dispersion on a sector performance level for the month. All sectors were in negative territory with cyclical sectors giving up just a bit more. On an issuer level, we gained by not owning names like Weatherford, Sanchez Energy and Hexion. All these names are exposed to cyclical commodity markets and were hammered on third quarter figures that missed expectations. We benefited from our overweight Tesco that got upgraded by one of the rating agencies. We lost some ground with our overweight in auto and housing. Names like Adient, Axalta and Lennar underperformed.
Statistics
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate( (fund.fundStatistics.date?fund.fundStatistics.date:fund.fundCharacteristics.date) ,'llll') ]}}| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation |
|
||
| Max. monthly gain (%) |
|
||
| Tracking error ex-post (%) |
|
||
| Alpha | |||
| Beta |
|
||
| Sharpe ratio | |||
| Information ratio | |||
| Max. monthly loss (%) |
|
| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit ratio (%) | |||
| Hit ratio Bear (%) | |||
| Hit ratio Bull (%) | |||
| Months Bear market | |||
| Months Bull market | |||
| Months outperformance | |||
| Months outperformance Bear | |||
| Months outperformance Bull |
| Fund | Reference index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Option Adjusted Modified Duration (years) | |||
| Maturity (years) | |||
| Rating | |||
| Yield to Worst (%) |
Market development
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Global high yield bond spreads came under some pressure in October. Moderation in global growth expectations was visible in the equity markets. The S&P500 saw its sharpest decline since September 2011. This was fueled by the underwhelming start of third quarter earnings season, especially in technology. The IMF lowered its growth forecast for the first time in more than two years due to rising trade tensions and emerging market turmoil. Sentiment in Europe was also impaired by the announcement of a larger-than-anticipated Italian budget-deficit proposal, which was rejected by the European Commission. The budget announcement was followed by a sovereign rating downgrade of Italy by Moody’s. WTI oil prices closed roughly USD 10 below the intra-month high amid supply and trade-related demand concerns. Energy, housing and retail were the biggest losers for the month. Year-to-date telecom and healthcare are the best performing sectors. Although spreads widened, the high yield asset class held up ‘relatively’ well compared to other asset classes. Global high yield bond spreads and yields widened around 50 bps and are now at 383 bps with an average yield of 6.34%.
Fund allocation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundAllocations.date,'llll') ]}}| Name | Sector | Weight |
|---|---|---|
Fund Classification
| Yes | No | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting | ||||
| Engagement | ||||
| ESG integration | ||||
| Exclusion |
| Yes | No | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening | ||||
| Integration | ||||
| Sustainability Themed Fund |
Currency policy
All currency risks are hedged.
Derivative policy
Robeco High Yield Bonds make use of derivatives for hedging purposes as well as for investment purposes. These derivatives are very liquid.
Dividend policy
The fund does not distribute dividend. The income earned by the fund is reflected in its share price. The fund's entire result is thus reflected in its share price development.
ESG Integration policy
The prime goal of integrating ESG factors in our analysis is to strengthen our ability to assess the downside risk of our credit investments. Our analysts include RobecoSAM sustainability data and use external sources to make an ESG assessment as a part of the fundamental analysis.
Investment policy
Robeco High Yield Bonds invests in corporate bonds with a sub-investment grade rating, issued primarily by US and European issuers. The portfolio is broadly diversified across circa 250 issuers, with a structural bias to the higher rated part in high yield (BB/B). Performance drivers are the top-down beta positioning as well as bottom-up issuer selection. The fund aims to outperform its index Barclays US Corporate High Yield & Pan European High Yield ex Financials 2.5% Issuer Cap. The index excludes high yield financials based on relatively high systematic risk, and applies an issuer cap to avoid concentration risk. The investment philosophy is based on managing a solid diversified portfolio with a long term view. Top-down beta positioning is based on the outcome of our credit quarterly outlook meeting, in which the team is discussing the fundamental market outlook, valuation of bond markets and market technicals. Bottom-up issuer research is executed by our credit analysts, who execute the fundamental analysis. The analysts research reports are being discussed in approx. 500 credit committees per year. In addition, a proprietary quant issuer selection model is used as an independent performance driver. The portfolio managers are responsible for the portfolio construction. A proprietary developed risk management approach avoids high risk concentration in the portfolio. Holdings in equities can only appear in the portfolio as a result of corporate actions and/or debt restructuring. It is not the intention of the portfolio manager to use options or swaptions. As the investment process is well-structured and proven over time, it contributes to repeatable performance delivery. The Robeco High Yield fund is managed by our credit team which consists of eight portfolio managers and thirteen credit analysts. Within the team, Sander Bus and Roeland Moraal are responsible for high yield. Sander has been involved in the fund since inception in 1998, Roeland joined in 2003. The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team's fundamental research. Duration of the portfolio is managed in line with the index and currency exposure is hedged.
Risk policy
Risk management is fully embedded in the investment process to ensure that positions always meet predefined guidelines.
Expectation of fund manager
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}The US economy is growing above its potential. Job openings are now exceeding the number of unemployed workers. In this environment it is no surprise that the Fed is continuing to hike. Tighter dollar liquidity is putting pressure on non-US issuers that rely on dollar funding. At the same time, the ECB is still reluctant to tighten monetary policy more aggressively. Divergence between global bond markets has increased in the last three months, with US spreads tightening further, while Europe and especially emerging markets underperformed. October showed us that the negative correlation between the US and international credit markets cannot continue indefinitely, as US spreads widened alongside other markets . The fact that the Fed is on a hiking path and the ECB’s quantitative easing is drawing to an end, are not helping fixed income as an asset class. It makes you wonder who will be the marginal buyer of credit and fixed income in general in such an environment. US insurance companies and pension funds could be potential candidates as they may have an incentive to increase fixed income allocations now that coverage ratios have improved. We keep our beta below one.
Sander Bus, Roeland Moraal
Mr. Bus is Head of the Credit team and manages our high yield portfolios. Prior to joining Robeco in 1998, Mr. Bus worked for Rabobank as a fixed income analyst for two years. Mr. Bus holds a Master's degree in Financial Economics from Erasmus University, Rotterdam. He became a CFA charter holder in 2003 and is registered with the Dutch Securities Institute. Mr. Bus has been active in the industry since 1996. Mr. Roeland Moraal, Vice President, CEFA, Portfolio Manager. Roeland is a Senior Portfolio Manager High Yield within Robeco's Credit team since January 2004. Before assuming this role, he was portfolio manager in our Rates team for two years and worked as an analyst with the Institute for Research and Investment Services for three years. Roeland started his career in the investment industry in 1997 at Robeco. He holds a Master's degree in applied mathematics from the University of Twente and a Master's degree in Law from Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Roeland became a CEFA charter holder in 2000 and he is registered with the Dutch Securities Institute.
Team
The Robeco High Yield fund is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts. The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by three dedicated quantitative researchers and four fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.
Details
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Management company | |
| Fund capital | |
| Size of share class | |
| Outstanding shares | |
| ISIN | LU0398248921 |
| Bloomberg | RGHYBID LX |
| Valoren | 3251005 |
| WKN | A0YFGL |
| Availability | |
| 1st quotation date | 1231804800000 |
| Close financial year | 31-12 |
| Legal status | |
| Tracking error limit (%) | |
| Morningstar |
|
| Reference index |
Cost of this fund
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundCosts.managementFees.date,'llll') ]}}Ongoing charges |
|
|---|---|
| This fund deducts ongoing charges of |
| These charges comprise | ||
|---|---|---|
| Management fee | ||
| Service fee | ||
Transaction costs |
|
|---|---|
| The expected transaction costs are |
Performance fee |
|
|---|---|
| This fund may also deduct a performance fee of |
Extra fees
| max entry fee | ||
| Max exit fee | ||
| Max sub fee | ||
| Max switch fee |
Fiscal product treatment
The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.01% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.
Fiscal treatment of investor
Investors who are not subject to (exempt from) Dutch corporate-income tax (e.g. pension funds) are not taxed on the achieved result. Investors who are subject to Dutch corporate-income tax can be taxed for the result achieved on their investment in the fund. Dutch bodies that are subject to corporate-income tax are obligated to declare interest and dividend income, as well as capital gains in their tax return. Investors residing outside the Netherlands are subject to their respective national tax regime applying to foreign investment funds. We advise individual investors to consult their financial or tax adviser about the tax consequences of an investment in this fund in their specific circumstances before deciding to invest in the fund.
