RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds FH USD

Sander Bus is CIO and Lead Portfolio Manager Global High Yield Bonds. He has been dedicated to High Yield at Robeco since 1998. Previously, Sander worked for two years as a Fixed Income Analyst at Rabobank where he started his career in the industry in 1996. He holds a Master's in Financial Economics from Erasmus University Rotterdam and he is a CFA® charterholder. Christiaan Lever is Portfolio Manager High Yield and Emerging Credits in the Credit team. Before assuming this role in 2016, he was Financial Risk Manager at Robeco, focusing on market risk, counterparty risk and liquidity risk within fixed Income markets. Christiaan has been active in the industry since 2010. He holds a Master's in Quantitative Finance and in Econometrics from Erasmus University Rotterdam. RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts. The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by three dedicated quantitative researchers and four fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.

The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.05% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.

The fiscal consequences of investing in this fund depend on the investor's personal situation. For private investors in the Netherlands real interest and dividend income or capital gains received on their investments are not relevant for tax purposes. Each year investors pay income tax on the value of their net assets as at 1 January if and inasmuch as such net assets exceed the investor’s tax-free allowance. Any amount invested in the fund forms part of the investor's net assets. Private investors who are resident outside the Netherlands will not be taxed in the Netherlands on their investments in the fund. However, such investors may be taxed in their country of residence on any income from an investment in this fund based on the applicable national fiscal laws. Other fiscal rules apply to legal entities or professional investors. We advise investors to consult their financial or tax adviser about the tax consequences of an investment in this fund in their specific circumstances before deciding to invest in the fund.

Sustainability is incorporated in the investment process by the means of a target universe, exclusions, ESG integration, and a minimum allocation to ESG-labeled bonds. The fund solely invests in credits issued by companies with a positive or neutral impact on the SDGs. The impact of issuers on the SDGs is determined by applying Robeco's internally developed three-step SDG Framework. The outcome is a quantified contribution expressed as an SDG score, considering both the contribution to the SDGs (positive, neutral or negative) and the extent of this contribution (high, medium or low). In addition, the fund does not invest in credit issuers that are in breach of international norms or where activities have been deemed detrimental to society following Robeco's exclusion policy. ESG factors are integrated in the bottom-up security analysis to assess the impact of financially material ESG risk on the issuer's fundamental credit quality. Furthermore, the fund invests at least 2% in green, social, sustainable, and/or sustainability-linked bonds. Lastly, where a credit issuer is flagged for breaching international standards in the ongoing monitoring, the issuer will become subject to exclusion.

After a very strong start to the year for financial markets, we saw that somewhat reverse in February. Although high yield spreads tightened somewhat during the month, the rise in underlying sovereign yields pushed total returns into negative territory. At the beginning of the month, we got a strong US jobs report and unemployment declined to record lows in the US. Although these figures contain good macro news, the data did raise concerns that inflation would prove to be more sticky than previously thought. These concerns were accelerated by an upward revision to the (soft) inflation prints at the end of last year. This led to markets reassessing how fast central banks would react to these inflation figures. Meaning that economic growth would remain strong and the current hiking path would not be sufficient to get inflation figures down. High yield company earnings and guidance continue to lean to the positive in the fourth quarter, which is consistent with the macro narrative. This hawkish sentiment pushed treasuries and Bunds wider. Capital market activity faded a bit, with yields surging. Spreads tightened 11 bps, where yields widened 44 bps respectively and are now 413 bps and 8.30%

Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was -1.06%. The high yield bond index had a negative total return in February at -1.29% on the back of tighter spreads in combination with wider underlying rates. The latter was driven by increased concerns around a hawkish future Fed rate hike policy. The fund outperformed its benchmark this month by a few basis points. Our issuer selection made a small positive contribution to performance (+4 bps) for the month. Our quality bias made a negative contribution for the month, as US BBs repriced more viciously on the back of ETF outflow. Our regional overweight Europe versus US was a small contributor, as US spreads underperformed EUR spreads. On an issuer level, we gained by not owning issuers like Rakuten (2 bps), Lumen (3 bps) and Country Garden (2 bps). The largest detractor was having an overweight in Level 3 (-6 bps). This structure underperformed, as top-line figures disappointed market expectations. The largest contributor was our overweight in Catalent (4 bps). Rumors that Danaher (an investment grade-rated competitor) would be interested in buying Catalent, caused bonds to move up a few points. The overweights in Sirius and Charter are examples of BBs in the USD market that have underperformed.

Our base case is that the US as well as Europe will experience a recession in 2023. Although we expect the recessions to play out to be mutually reinforcing, the root cause will be different. The US is likely to experience a classic boom-bust cycle, whereas the European recession will be driven largely by an energy supply shock. As the probability of a recession rises and becomes part of the consensus view, market dispersion will increase. The lower-quality end of the credit spectrum is likely to see an increased default rate, while the higher end could benefit from lower rates and a flight to quality. Once a recession is fully priced in and spreads reach their own peak, that would be the time to go outright long, even in high yield. Typically, that point is reached well before default rates have peaked. The Fed and the ECB are determined to keep monetary policy tight until they see confirmation that inflation will reach their target. The good news is that inflation has started to moderate, which means the end of the hiking cycle is in sight. But that does not mean the Fed is anywhere close to cutting rates. Beta has decreased a bit as valuations have moved to long-term averages.